Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,494
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,269:
Line 1,269: − + + + + + +
→Message from QuantumDude
:Are you saying that email sent to sam4557@gmail.com fails? I received mail at that account about 3 hours ago.
:Are you saying that email sent to sam4557@gmail.com fails? I received mail at that account about 3 hours ago.
:Remember that "they" in your previous paragraph (presumably Andy and Cons) aren't the people you are addressing when you write about science and other things. It's the [[Conservapedia:Community_Portal#Two_millionth_page_view_for_the_.22Counterexamples_to_Relativity.22_page|two million people]] who read the stuff.
:Remember that "they" in your previous paragraph (presumably Andy and Cons) aren't the people you are addressing when you write about science and other things. It's the [[Conservapedia:Community_Portal#Two_millionth_page_view_for_the_.22Counterexamples_to_Relativity.22_page|two million people]] who read the stuff.
::First, something being unquestioned (the consensus argument is not scientific as true science is based on sound evidence/experiments and not merely voting) does not make something true.
::Second, from an astrophysicists' website from a 2015 article: "So the broad consensus is that black holes definitely exist. There are some astronomers who prefer to withhold judgment until we resolve the region around an event horizon." [https://briankoberlein.com/about/ HERE] is a bio of the astrophysicist.
::So much for your "unquestioned" claim! :) I empirically showed your claim to be false. Put that in your frontiers of science pipe and smoke it! :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (EST)
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}