SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,181:
Line 1,181: + + Line 1,245:
Line 1,247: − − ==References== − {{reflist}} + + + + + + + + + + +
various replies to Cons
Put that in your evolutionism pipe and smoke it! :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:45, 9 January 2016 (EST)
Put that in your evolutionism pipe and smoke it! :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:45, 9 January 2016 (EST)
:I don't smoke. Though I really do like the "put that in your pipe and smoke it" line. My father used it frequently. But seriously, the correctness of evolution has nothing to do with what Richard Dawkins once said in an elevator, or about the traffic of his web site. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:37, 8 February 2016 (EST)
== Re: a userbox on your user page ==
== Re: a userbox on your user page ==
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:28, 23 January 2016 (EST)
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:28, 23 January 2016 (EST)
== Another atheism article that does not begin with "Atheism and" ==
== Another atheism article that does not begin with "Atheism and" ==
Another atheism related article that does not begin with "Atheism and": [[Sexual harassment at atheist conferences]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:38, 4 February 2016 (EST)
Another atheism related article that does not begin with "Atheism and": [[Sexual harassment at atheist conferences]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:38, 4 February 2016 (EST)
:While I have kidded you about the enormous number of "Atheism and ..." articles, I never claimed that they were the only atheism-related articles that you write.
:From your comment above, and the comment that you placed on EJamesW's talk page, I get the idea that you are pining for a "sparring partner". I've been away for a while, largely because of some distressing things that have been going on here. But I want you to know that I have other interests outside of Conservapedia, and I have other friends. While I enjoy our conversations, they aren't my life.
:And while I have your attention, something about your writing skill. I'm serious about this.<ref>Why do I say "I'm serious" so often? Because we do so much kidding around!</ref>. I have lately been utterly appalled at the misspellings, bad punctuation, and atrocious sentence construction of a lot of our newer editors. I occasionally remark on this. I want you to know that ''my remarks are not aimed at you.'' Your grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure are ''above average'' among the Conservapedia authors that I read. Though you need to watch for commas and non-restrictive subordinate clauses. (Why don't the newer authors mess up their subordinate clauses? Because they rarely use them, or their sentences are so messed up that I can't tell whether they are using a subordinate clause or not.) Now you just need to write paragraphs with meaningful content.
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:37, 8 February 2016 (EST)
==References==
{{reflist}}