Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
6 bytes removed ,  07:52, January 15, 2013
wording
Line 43: Line 43:  
Also according to creation science theories, after the Flood, emus bred from the Ark passengers then [[migrate]]d to Australia.
 
Also according to creation science theories, after the Flood, emus bred from the Ark passengers then [[migrate]]d to Australia.
 
There is debate whether this migration happened over land<ref name="ag1">[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/migration.asp "How did animals get from the Ark to places such as Australia"], Answers In Genesis</ref> as it is thought that Australia was still for a time after the Flood connected to the Middle East before the supercontinent of [[Pangea]] broke apart<ref>[http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2808 "Pangea and the Flood"], Apologetics Press</ref> or if they [[rafting (ecology) | rafted]] on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood waters.<ref name="ag1"/>
 
There is debate whether this migration happened over land<ref name="ag1">[http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/migration.asp "How did animals get from the Ark to places such as Australia"], Answers In Genesis</ref> as it is thought that Australia was still for a time after the Flood connected to the Middle East before the supercontinent of [[Pangea]] broke apart<ref>[http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2808 "Pangea and the Flood"], Apologetics Press</ref> or if they [[rafting (ecology) | rafted]] on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood waters.<ref name="ag1"/>
−
The [[theory]] that [[God]] simply generated emus into existence there is considered by most creation researchers to be contra-[[Bible|Biblical]].
+
The [[theory]] that [[God]] simply generated emus into existence is considered by most creation researchers to be contra-[[Bible|Biblical]].
    
==References==
 
==References==
2,315

edits

Navigation menu