TaKess
i keep forgetting to sign
+49
TaKess
no edit summary
+196
RobertWDP
→Is it falsifiable or not?
+366
TaKess
no edit summary
+283
TaKess
no edit summary
+49
TaKess
no edit summary
+152
Aschlafly
black holes
+122
TaKess
no edit summary
m+121
TaKess
black holes
+461
Aschlafly
→Is it falsifiable or not?: reply
+294
TaKess
no edit summary
m+65
TaKess
no edit summary
+767
Aschlafly
→Is it falsifiable or not?: reply
+225
TaKess
minor change to article
+512
SStaples
→Is it falsifiable or not?
+198
Aschlafly
→Is it falsifiable or not?: more semantics
+235
TaKess
no edit summary
+680
Aschlafly
→Is it falsifiable or not?: valid semantic point
+139
DeanS
Reverted edits by Stupefied (Talk) to last version by SStaples
m-146
Stupefied
→Is it falsifiable or not?
+146
SStaples
→Is it falsifiable or not?
+732
Aschlafly
→Is it falsifiable or not?: reply
+281
TaKess
falsifiability?
+548
Philip J. Rayment
→Atheism & scientists: The scientists, and agree that God is not a deceiver.
+478
LyraBelaqua
Atheism & scientists
+551
Sid 3050
→swap article and discussion pages for superior treatment, more fun
+854
MylesP
→swap article and discussion pages for superior treatment, more fun
-154
Sid 3050
→Young Earth Creation Hypothesis
+624
CatWatcher
→Young Earth Creation Hypothesis
m+230
CatWatcher
Young Earth Creation Hypothesis
+2,241
Sid 3050
→swap article and discussion pages for superior treatment, more fun
+399
MylesP
→swap article and discussion pages for superior treatment, more fun
+1
MylesP
swap article and discussion pages for superior treatment, more fun
+1,949
Sid 3050
AustinM!!!
+723
Sid 3050
→Suggested move
m+138
Sid 3050
Talk:Moon Theories moved to Talk:Origin of the Moon: Makes more sense this way.
mLand Dweller
→Suggested move
+195
British cons
→New Scientist Article
+115
Sid 3050
Suggested move
+173
Sid 3050
→New Scientist Article
+71
AmesG
→New Scientist Article
+93
Sid 3050
→New Scientist Article
+327
AmesG
→New Scientist Article
+96
Sid 3050
→New Scientist Article
+300
British cons
→New Scientist Article
+131
Sid 3050
→New Scientist Article
+186
British cons
no edit summary
+286
Palmd001
→Clinging to unsupported theories
+234