DavidB4
Reverted edits by BruceAlmighty (talk) to last revision by DavidB4
m+292
BruceAlmighty
Yeah.
-292
DavidB4
→Should this article be split?: I'm okay with it too
+292
1990'sguy
→Should this article be split?
+216
Northwest
→Should this article be split?: reply
+443
DavidB4
→Duplication and organization: tweak - to be fair, most lists are better
+124
DavidB4
→Duplication and organization: new section
+1,485
PatriotMongoose
no edit summary
+275
PatriotMongoose
no edit summary
+45
PatriotMongoose
no edit summary
+313
Conservative
Conservative moved page Talk:Corporate liberal tyranny to Talk:Liberal corporate tyranny
mConservative
Conservative moved page Talk:Corporate tyranny to Talk:Corporate liberal tyranny
mPatriotMongoose
→Inclusion of groups in here: new section
+1,130
1990'sguy
Don't see any reason for removing these talk page comments.
+2,294
Karajou
Reverted edits by PatriotMongoose (talk) to last revision by DavidB4
m-2,294
PatriotMongoose
no edit summary
+1,808
PatriotMongoose
no edit summary
+486
DavidB4
→Should this article be split?: bot only reduced it 1,957
+299
DavidB4
→Should this article be split?: re
+488
1990'sguy
→Should this article be split?
+364
DavidB4
→Should this article be split?: how does POC look?
+330
1990'sguy
→Should this article be split?
+167
DavidB4
→Should this article be split?: suggestion: tabulate data to use whitespace
+368
DavidB4
if conflict, overwrite mine
+372
DavidB4
→Should this article be split?: re
+732
1990'sguy
→Should this article be split?
+170
Northwest
→Should this article be split?: reply
+179
DavidB4
→Should this article be split?: streamline, don't split
+625
1990'sguy
→Should this article be split?
+228