DavidB4-bot
→top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://www.nytimes.com → https://www.nytimes.com
m+1
Karajou
Reverted edits by Stromwallace (talk) to last revision by Karajou
m+8,100
Stromwallace
Replaced content with "Liberals have been known to make great friends, as they share personal belongings and are inclined to help their friends out."
m-8,100
Karajou
Reverted edits by HMatthews (talk) to last revision by Jm920
m-121
HMatthews
no edit summary
+121
Iduan
you reverted multiple administrators with your edits. if you revert me again you'll be temporarily blocked. enough with your edit warring
+230
HarabecW
Undo revision 867554 by Iduan (talk)
-230
Iduan
revert
+230
HarabecW
no edit summary
-249
HarabecW
no edit summary
-4
HarabecW
no edit summary
+23
Aschlafly
Reverted edits by Gregory123 (Talk) to last version by MarkGall
m+7,972
Gregory123
Replaced content with 'what a bunch of crap'
-7,972
Ed Poor
Reverted edits by NTemple (Talk) to last version by EdBot
m-12
NTemple
This page has no business in an encyclopedia. If we want to be taken seriously, let's move this to the "Essays" section.
+12
Jareddr
Undo revision by Jpatt...Still gotta show that Jon Lovitz (who played the devil on SNL) is a conservative before I move onto the rest of its ridiculousness
-128
Jpatt
reference for: they may wish you die
+128
JJacob
see, easy fix
-28
JJacob
Undo revision 489726 by Jareddr (Talk)I'll reqrite so dont delete it all
+772
Jareddr
Rewrite it if you want, but don't make inflammatory statements that liberals want "you and your family" to die
-772
TerryH
Reverted edits by Celestial (Talk); changed back to last version by CSGuy
m+6,834
Celestial
Replacing page with 'Darrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'
-6,834
CSGuy
Undo revision 446194 by Special:Contributions/Bobthebrick (User talk:Bobthebrick) Apparently that's not grounds for deletion
+6,786
Bobthebrick
Replacing page with 'This article deleted due to extraordinary bias and lack of factual content.'
-6,786
Karajou
Reverted edits by StephenC (Talk); changed back to last version by TerryH
m-154
StephenC
no edit summary
+154
TerryH
Reverted edits by Foxkite (Talk); changed back to last version by TK
m+6,838
Foxkite
no edit summary
+23
Foxkite
Removing all content from page
-6,861
TK
rmv silly paroditic stmnt
-143
DLerner
Undo revision 427162 by Special:Contributions/DrSandstone (User talk:DrSandstone) Your claim is about Kennedy and O'neill, not whether liberals always fake it
+17
DrSandstone
Undo revision 427157 by Special:Contributions/DLerner (User talk:DLerner) I absolutely did, and it's right there on the talk page for all to see. Learn to read.
-17
DLerner
Undo revision 427151 by Special:Contributions/DrSandstone (User talk:DrSandstone) see talk page, virtually never is a logical fallacy (proving a negative) besides you didn't give a reason
m+17
DrSandstone
Undo revision 427145 by Special:Contributions/Humblpi (User talk:Humblpi) Yes, see talk. Seems adequately challenged there. Don't take my word for it.
-17
Humblpi
I thought this version neatly dealt with the problem of the outrageous "virtually never". Please take to talk if you disagree,
+17