Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sievert 81/drafts"
From Conservapedia
m |
Sievert 81 (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::(ec)For example, any alleged "right-winger" could see a "Unite the Right" rally was [[community organizer|community organized]] leftwing bait, and would stay miles away. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:35, 5 December 2020 (EST) | ::(ec)For example, any alleged "right-winger" could see a "Unite the Right" rally was [[community organizer|community organized]] leftwing bait, and would stay miles away. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:35, 5 December 2020 (EST) | ||
| + | :::How about 'Most blackpillers are far-left. There are 2 main types: Neo-Nazis and socialists. [[User:Sievert 81|Sievert 81]] ([[User talk:Sievert 81|talk]]) 15:36, 5 December 2020 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:36, December 5, 2020
Blackpillers are leftwing. Some blackpillers claim to be rightwing, however the ones that do are almost exclusively neo-Nazis and thus leftwing instead. Better?
- What is the purpose of making any reference to "right-wing"? Alleged "right-wingers" tend to be individualists, and not part of any organized collective. RobSFree Kyle! 15:32, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- Because a lot of them like to claim they are and fool a lot of people. I want to discredit them. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- (ec)For example, any alleged "right-winger" could see a "Unite the Right" rally was community organized leftwing bait, and would stay miles away. RobSFree Kyle! 15:35, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- How about 'Most blackpillers are far-left. There are 2 main types: Neo-Nazis and socialists. Sievert 81 (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2020 (EST)
- (ec)For example, any alleged "right-winger" could see a "Unite the Right" rally was community organized leftwing bait, and would stay miles away. RobSFree Kyle! 15:35, 5 December 2020 (EST)
