Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Delete"

Latest revision as of 00:32, June 23, 2021

How would we feel about changing this template to

That way, it would be more clear to the reader that the article may be so flawed as to merit deletion. The current template is unobtrusive, and so readers might not notice this important information. JacobB 03:52, 23 December 2009 (EST)

Nominating this for deletion/merging

Conservapedia got rid of its AFD process years ago (a very short time after users introduced it) since all deletions decisions are made solely by the administrators to avoid evil liberals from taking over the site (this was pretty much the verbatim reasoning back then).

So let's just change over the current "candidates" to {{speedy}} unless they're salvageable and erase this template. --Sid 3050 21:22, 6 August 2011 (EDT)

This piece of code was accidentally removed

<includeonly>[[Category:Deletion candidates]]</includeonly>

This category shows up on any page that has been marked for deletion, but has been accidentally removed from the template. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 20:29, June 22, 2021 (EDT)

yah, I see what I did. Duh. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 20:30, June 22, 2021 (EDT)

Huh, duplicate deletion categories. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 20:32, June 22, 2021 (EDT)