Difference between revisions of "Talk:World History Study Guide to 1648"
From Conservapedia
Fontecedro (Talk | contribs) (Holy shit! I can't believe it's a magic toad!) |
(→Two terms should be combined: great suggestion) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Marvelous work! But may I draw you attention to [[User talk:Aschlafly#Have you made a determination yet?]] --[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 18:30, 14 August 2011 (EDT) | |
| + | |||
| + | == Suggestions == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Justinius I/the Justinian Code | ||
| + | |||
| + | Holy Roman Empire/Charlemagne | ||
| + | |||
| + | Origen (Perhaps an Honors term) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sun Tzu | ||
| + | |||
| + | Niccolo Machiavelli | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Catholic Monarchs | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 09:45, 18 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Brahman/Brahmin == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why combine these two terms? Although they are very similar in spelling/pronunciation, they have two very distinctive meanings. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 13:51, 24 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together. One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Actually, why not eliminate brahmin altogether? It is already defined somewhat under "caste", and the other three caste categories are not included in the term list - there's no reason to single out brahmin. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:15, 25 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::But the concept of "brahmin" appears more often, and thus is more important, than the other caste levels. It's even a common term in English, as in referring to wealthy (and typically liberal) families in Boston.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:18, 30 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Demosthenes == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Andy, which Demosthenes do you want described - the general or the statesman? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:12, 30 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The statesman would be more important, so let's refer to him.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:17, 30 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Subscript == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Can we remove the subscript from this page? Some of us are old and have difficulty reading the small font. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 10:05, 8 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I made it "small" as a compromise. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 13:30, 9 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Nile River == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Andy, the Nile River has been added to both sections - which one do you want it in? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 13:26, 9 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Two terms should be combined == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Two basic terms, taijitu and yin and yang, are the same thing. Shouldn't they be combined? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 18:25, 8 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Great suggestion. I just combined them.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:25, 8 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:25, October 9, 2011
Marvelous work! But may I draw you attention to User talk:Aschlafly#Have you made a determination yet? --RonLar 18:30, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
Contents
Suggestions
Justinius I/the Justinian Code
Holy Roman Empire/Charlemagne
Origen (Perhaps an Honors term)
Sun Tzu
Niccolo Machiavelli
The Catholic Monarchs
--Benp 09:45, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
Brahman/Brahmin
Why combine these two terms? Although they are very similar in spelling/pronunciation, they have two very distinctive meanings. --SharonW 13:51, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
- They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together. One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--Andy Schlafly 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
- Actually, why not eliminate brahmin altogether? It is already defined somewhat under "caste", and the other three caste categories are not included in the term list - there's no reason to single out brahmin. --SharonW 23:15, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
- But the concept of "brahmin" appears more often, and thus is more important, than the other caste levels. It's even a common term in English, as in referring to wealthy (and typically liberal) families in Boston.--Andy Schlafly 12:18, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
Demosthenes
Andy, which Demosthenes do you want described - the general or the statesman? --SharonW 12:12, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
- The statesman would be more important, so let's refer to him.--Andy Schlafly 12:17, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
Subscript
Can we remove the subscript from this page? Some of us are old and have difficulty reading the small font. --SharonW 10:05, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
- I made it "small" as a compromise. --SharonW 13:30, 9 September 2011 (EDT)
Nile River
Andy, the Nile River has been added to both sections - which one do you want it in? --SharonW 13:26, 9 September 2011 (EDT)
Two terms should be combined
Two basic terms, taijitu and yin and yang, are the same thing. Shouldn't they be combined? --SharonW 18:25, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
- Great suggestion. I just combined them.--Andy Schlafly 20:25, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
