Difference between revisions of "Talk:World History Study Guide to 1648"
From Conservapedia
(→Subscript: new section) |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:The statesman would be more important, so let's refer to him.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:17, 30 August 2011 (EDT) | :The statesman would be more important, so let's refer to him.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:17, 30 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Subscript == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Can we remove the subscript from this page? Some of us are old and have difficulty reading the small font. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 10:05, 8 September 2011 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:05, September 8, 2011
Marvelous work! But may I draw you attention to User talk:Aschlafly#Have you made a determination yet? --RonLar 18:30, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
Suggestions
Justinius I/the Justinian Code
Holy Roman Empire/Charlemagne
Origen (Perhaps an Honors term)
Sun Tzu
Niccolo Machiavelli
The Catholic Monarchs
--Benp 09:45, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
Brahman/Brahmin
Why combine these two terms? Although they are very similar in spelling/pronunciation, they have two very distinctive meanings. --SharonW 13:51, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
- They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together. One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--Andy Schlafly 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
- Actually, why not eliminate brahmin altogether? It is already defined somewhat under "caste", and the other three caste categories are not included in the term list - there's no reason to single out brahmin. --SharonW 23:15, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
- But the concept of "brahmin" appears more often, and thus is more important, than the other caste levels. It's even a common term in English, as in referring to wealthy (and typically liberal) families in Boston.--Andy Schlafly 12:18, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
Demosthenes
Andy, which Demosthenes do you want described - the general or the statesman? --SharonW 12:12, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
- The statesman would be more important, so let's refer to him.--Andy Schlafly 12:17, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
Subscript
Can we remove the subscript from this page? Some of us are old and have difficulty reading the small font. --SharonW 10:05, 8 September 2011 (EDT)