Difference between revisions of "Talk:World History Study Guide to 1648"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 907670 by UndoSclaf (talk))
(Subscript: new section)
Line 31: Line 31:
  
 
:The statesman would be more important, so let's refer to him.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:17, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:The statesman would be more important, so let's refer to him.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:17, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Subscript ==
 +
 +
Can we remove the subscript from this page? Some of us are old and have difficulty reading the small font. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 10:05, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:05, September 8, 2011

Marvelous work! But may I draw you attention to User talk:Aschlafly#Have you made a determination yet? --RonLar 18:30, 14 August 2011 (EDT)

Suggestions

Justinius I/the Justinian Code

Holy Roman Empire/Charlemagne

Origen (Perhaps an Honors term)

Sun Tzu

Niccolo Machiavelli

The Catholic Monarchs

--Benp 09:45, 18 August 2011 (EDT)

Brahman/Brahmin

Why combine these two terms? Although they are very similar in spelling/pronunciation, they have two very distinctive meanings. --SharonW 13:51, 24 August 2011 (EDT)

They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together. One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--Andy Schlafly 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
Actually, why not eliminate brahmin altogether? It is already defined somewhat under "caste", and the other three caste categories are not included in the term list - there's no reason to single out brahmin. --SharonW 23:15, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
But the concept of "brahmin" appears more often, and thus is more important, than the other caste levels. It's even a common term in English, as in referring to wealthy (and typically liberal) families in Boston.--Andy Schlafly 12:18, 30 August 2011 (EDT)

Demosthenes

Andy, which Demosthenes do you want described - the general or the statesman? --SharonW 12:12, 30 August 2011 (EDT)

The statesman would be more important, so let's refer to him.--Andy Schlafly 12:17, 30 August 2011 (EDT)

Subscript

Can we remove the subscript from this page? Some of us are old and have difficulty reading the small font. --SharonW 10:05, 8 September 2011 (EDT)