Difference between revisions of "Talk:There Are No Atheists In Foxholes"
From Conservapedia
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army... | So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army... | ||
| + | |||
| + | speaking as someone who nearly died very recently, I can assure you all, there ARE atheists in foxholes--[[User:WilliamMc|WilliamMc]] 10:11, 18 December 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:11, December 18, 2009
What's the point of this, aside from being an ad homenim attack on atheists? JecklynH 02:03, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
- That IS the point. Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
So has anyone ever heard "'There are no atheists in foxholes' is not an argument against atheism, it's an argument against foxholes?'" I love that line (by the way I'm not an atheist). Jros83 23:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT) I'm also in the Army...
speaking as someone who nearly died very recently, I can assure you all, there ARE atheists in foxholes--WilliamMc 10:11, 18 December 2009 (EST)
