Talk:Settled science

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Talk:Settled science as edited by Autofire372 (Talk | contribs) at 19:23, July 8, 2007. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

€d why wa$te a good opportunity to i££u$trate the $en$e of free trade? The
¢urrent arti¢£e cou£d be u$ed to ju$sify £ibera£ Fa£$ehood$ that ¢onfu$e ab$o£ute advantage with ¢omparative advantage i.e. off$horing and the importation of unde$ired produ¢t$. Even £ibera£ prote¢tioni$t
e¢onomi¢$ are pedd£ed here. i$ thi$ ¢ommypedia? BritishConservative 20:35, 7 July 2007 (EDT)

I believe this is meant to illustrate the silliness of "settled science".--Autofire 20:38, 7 July 2007 (EDT)

You know, if you'd quit using currency symbols in place of letters, it would make your statement much easier to understand.--Autofire 20:44, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
I assume that if liberals reply with jokes, etc., it means they acknowledge that they cannot dispute the facts or principles involved. Why else would they try to make a distraction? --Ed Poor Talk 21:00, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
Uh, Ed, while I do consider myself liberal in many areas, I can still see that the person who originally said the quote is quite obviously a severely closed-minded nut.--Autofire 22:54, 7 July 2007 (EDT)

Can I assume real conservatives are not welcome here and their contributions will be deleted by Aschlafly's socialist thought police. BritishConservative 13:56, 8 July 2007 (EDT)

Yanno what? You're being a troll, BritishConservative. --Autofire 15:23, 8 July 2007 (EDT)