Talk:Intolerance

Necesary?

I'm somewhat worried that the part about homosexuality will be misconstrued by certain people as an arbitrary opinion added post facto to force some sort of "agenda," and thus it will invite trolling and vandalization. As it really does not add or detract from the concept of "Intolerance" one way or the other, I propose removing it, so as to not dangle such a morsel in front of the frothy mouths of slathering trolls... Jros83 16:17, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Yes i think that the idea of a intolerance article is rather ironic considering this website is intolerant, please dont try to argue this one, because you can't, you are intolerant. So i agree with the above text, that we should delete it, so that stupid liberals won't voice their opinions and so that we don't all become evil gay people, because then we wouldn't have overpopulation and stuff, so....

This page should just be deleted. It is an agenda, not an artical. If it is not deleated, someone should go in there and rewrite it. --Rocky

Yesterday i attempted to clean up the article and remove the pointedly anti-homosexual bias (and roundabout reasoning), but as usual, my edits were quickly reversed. Seriously, people...why use a wiki system when others' contributions are unilaterally discarded?JBrandonLoberg 17:55, 22 November 2008 (EST)

• This is billed as a "Christian/Conservative - Friendly" encyclopedia. Since it is God's Commandment there cannot be a "pro" argument for Homosexuality, can there? While Christians will pray for all those so misguided, neither will we be seen as condoning or excusing such behavior. --₮K^/Talk 18:25, 22 November 2008 (EST)