Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bisexual"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (pic of crowley)
(Occultist)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Is the picture of Crowley really neccesary? The quote underneath has nothing to do with his sexuality either.
 
Is the picture of Crowley really neccesary? The quote underneath has nothing to do with his sexuality either.
 
If you have to have a picture why not have someone more commonly known as being bi, such as David Bowie or William Burroughs. Dan M
 
If you have to have a picture why not have someone more commonly known as being bi, such as David Bowie or William Burroughs. Dan M
 +
 +
=Typo=
 +
"by the support o disinterested friendship"
 +
I think this should read "support of disinterested".

Revision as of 02:57, 31 December 2010

This article should be improved, not reduced. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 15:14, 11 February 2008 (EST)

I agree, but the Catholic quote is about homosexuality, not bisexuality; and the Yiddish quote is completely irrelevant. Improvement would involve deleting the irrelevant and adding relevant info. Dadsnagem2 15:26, 11 February 2008 (EST)

Occultist

I don't know if the thing about the occultist really belongs here. That said, I'll leave it for at least a couple hours to give people the chance to disagree w/ me here. I don't see why is should stay in the page, but if you post a decent reason her i'll leave it.


Is the picture of Crowley really neccesary? The quote underneath has nothing to do with his sexuality either. If you have to have a picture why not have someone more commonly known as being bi, such as David Bowie or William Burroughs. Dan M

Typo

"by the support o disinterested friendship" I think this should read "support of disinterested".