Suharto

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JakeRMurrin (Talk | contribs) at 03:28, October 12, 2010. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search
Suharto
Personal life
Date and place of birth 8 June 1921 , near Yogyakarta, Dutch East Indies
Parents Kertosudiro and Sukirah
Claimed religion Islam
Education {{{education}}}
Spouse Siti Hartinah (d. 1996)
Children Siti Hardiyanti Hastuti, Sigit Harjojudanto, Bambang Trihatmodjo, Siti Hediyati Hariyadi, Hutomo Mandala Putra, Siti Hutami Endang Adiningsih
Date & Place of Death 27 January 2008 (aged 86)
Manner of Death Sepsis, anaemia, heart failure
Place of burial Buried in Solo with military honors
Dictatorial career
Country Indonesia
Military service Led military purge of Communists; KOSTRAD Commander from 1961-65; Chief of Staff from 1965-67
Highest rank attained Chief of Staff and later Commander
Political beliefs Militarist
Political party Golkar
Date of dictatorship 12 March 1967 (Official Date); de facto leader with total control of military from 1965 alleged coup attempt on
Wars started Invasion of East Timor
Number of deaths attributed Post-Coup Purges: 750,000 (Private admission of comprehensive Indonesian government report); 450,000 (conclusion of secret 1976 Indonesian investigation); 250,000 (most widely accepted Western studies) East Timor: 18,600 killed and 75-183,000 "excess" deaths (Truth Commission)

Suharto (June 8, 1921 - January 27, 2008) was an anti-communist Indonesian military and political leader. He started as a military officer in the Indonesian National Revolution. He came to power following a bloodless coup in 1967, and served as the second President of Indonesia from 1967-1998 during which time he was involved in a number of massacres aimed at eliminating communists in Indonesia[1]. He was forced to resign his presidency in 1998 after mass demonstrations due to his authoritarian and corrupt administration. He passed away on January 27th, 2008.

Suharto was a close ally of the United States during the Cold War. As a result, he became a bête noire of the far left, who compared his crimes to those of Cambodia's Pol Pot--though relative to population size and percent killed, Pol Pot's were at least 50 times worse.[2] In the wake of US defeat in the Vietnam War, President Ford saw Indonesia as a vital American ally in Asia needed to preserve America's waning influence in that part of the world.

Genocide in East Timor

In 1975, Ford and Secretary of State Kissinger met with Suharto in Jakarta--as fate would have it, on the very day Indonesia decided to invade the tiny island of East Timor. East Timor was in the midst of a low-level civil war that led to thousands of deaths and to a military takeover by a de facto Socialist dictatorship headed by the left-wing FRETILIN Party. FRETILIN had waged a violent insurgency in East Timor to seize power and to force out Portuguese and later Indonesian "colonialists." Widely perceived as Communist by the outside world, FRETILIN was feared in Washington and financed by Moscow. Before FRETILIN could set up a stable government, Indonesia began preparing for non-violent solutions to the perceived problem of Timorese independence. Indonesian leaders feared that allowing Timorese independence would inspire secessionist movements that could bring about the collapse of Indonesia.

Although FRETILIN was given one last chance to avoid war, it rejected it for the sake of martyrdom. In an attempt to negotiate a settlement to the dispute over East Timor's future, the Portuguese Decolonization Commission convened a conference in June 1975 in Macau. Indonesia believed it could work with the Association for the Integration of Timor into Indonesia, a Timorese political party, to negotiate with FRETILIN. FRETILIN refused to attend the meeting on the grounds that it would never talk with them. José Manuel Ramos-Horta, the current President of East Timor and a FRETILIN leader, expressed regret for the failure to attend the meeting in his 1987 memoirs.

Many claim in retrospect that FRETILIN only sought independence for East Timor, and that the civil war was provoked by a failed coup by right-wing militarists, and not by FRETILIN. Had FRETILIN been able to set up a stable government, some say, East Timor might have made a transition to democracy. FRETILIN supporters would likely have been horrified had they negotiated with a party explicitly committed to the integration of East Timor into Indonesia under any circumstances, much less with a gun up against their head. Others note that FRETILIN gained power by force and used the military to enforce its edicts, and that 40,000 Timorese fled their homes to escape them.[3] Further, during the bloody Indonesian occupation, as many as 49% of all East Timorese civilians killed at various stages in the conflict were murdered by FRETILIN, and not by Indonesia.[4] FRETILIN overwhelmingly won free elections held after the Indonesian withdrawal.

But Ford and Kissinger believed that the Communists could not be allowed to make any further advances in the post-Vietnam War era, as they had in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Angola, and the Middle East. The Congress had sold out UNITA, Lon Nol, Brazil, Saigon, Phnom Penh, and Vientiane, Kissinger reasoned; the US needed all the friends it could get. If Indonesia was a blood-soaked friend, well, one should not look a gift horse in the mouth.

Kissinger and Ford gave Suharto a green-light to invade East Timor.[5] Ford was unambiguous: “We will understand and will not press you on the issue. We understand the problem and the intentions you have.” A Truth Commission revealed that the subsequent 24 year occupation would cause at least 18,600 violent killings and 75-183,000 deaths from hunger and illness,[6] counting deaths at the hands of both the FRETILIN Communists and the armed forces of Indonesia. A low estimate of the East Timorese population in 1975 was 700,000. Although censuses, especially in underdeveloped countries, are always undercounts; many leftists used this (faulty) statistic to exaggerate the scope of the crime. In reality, if East Timor's population had only been 700,000; then it's population would have been far, far higher after the atrocities took place than it was before.[7] The overall population is thus believed to have been over one million when the killings began, with at least 10% of the population being killed.[8]

References

  1. Suhato: A Political Biography, be R.E. Elson
  2. http://www.fair.org/extra/9809/suharto.html
  3. http://www.paulbogdanor.com/chomsky/labedz.pdf
  4. http://greatersurbiton.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/is-it-really-true-that-east-timor-was-worse-than-bosnia-or-kosovo/
  5. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB62/#doc4
  6. http://www.ictj.org/en/news/features/846.html
  7. http://www.paulbogdanor.com/chomsky/labedz.pdf
  8. http://www.paulbogdanor.com/chomsky/labedz.pdf