New page: New Scientist used to be a very good magazine, but in recent years I see it turning a lot more towards sensationalism to increase its readership. - BornAgainBrit
mIm not an expert, but I can recognise the section on use as a fuel is inaccurate... ive taken it out. Someone who knows what they are talking about can replace it.
m-715
Overboard!
m+368
no edit summary
m-279
Hard to research right now... my employer proxy blocks all sites relating to abortion.
m+31
Stub. Needs sources.
Its not entirely an evolutionist thing.
m+93
no edit summary
m+88
no edit summary
m+426
Confidence. We know some things as facts, so why prefix with disclaimers?
m-83
Expand.
+287
Overboard!
m+198
Trim. Took out all the parthenogenesis stuff as some of it looks questionable. Rewrote cancer section in more scientific terms. Took out whole 'for/against' thing, as this is already covered elsewhere
-2,872
no edit summary
+262
Hell without the biblical view?
+1,444
‎Synthetic cheeses: (Are icky)
m+334
Sorry, cant do it.
m+803
Nope... sorry, im as bad as anyone, I cant work out how to describe human mammary glands without seeming suggestive. Cut a dubious statement out though.
m-274
Prudes.
m+207
New page: Small list... why, when monotreme will hold much the same? - bornagainbrit
mno edit summary
m+656
Redirect to Thomas Jefferson
-241
Jefferson Bible.
+657
Jefferson Bible
+975
New paragraph.
m+220
Preemptive countering of anticipated anti-christian arguement. Really badly written, sorry, but im sure a few edits by others will clear it up.
+1,920
no edit summary
m+50
Just inserted a link to another page. Also... 'smell'.. could this be a corruption of 'miasma'?
m+20
very minor edit. chatter.
mNew page: I have to wonder... what is conservapedia's goal? Because I can see that its going to turn into a pop-culture reference like wikipedia without some standards for what ''cant'' be included ...
mLegal detail. The decision did not 'uphold the constitutionality.' Rather, it concluded that there was insufficient grounds to challenge the constitutionality. Actual constituionality not addressed.
m+297
no edit summary
m+191
no edit summary
m+239
no edit summary
m+31
no edit summary
m+270
wrong tense.
m+7
Two new comments added.
+1,614
no edit summary
m-16
Examples added.
m+997
Its quite different for us euros, so I just clarified this article only describes US standards.
m+21