Difference between revisions of "Social media"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(See also: update)
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:Godsbook.jpg|right|200px]]
 
[[File:Godsbook.jpg|right|200px]]
'''Social media''' -- a euphemism for [[gossip]] sites—is a term for websites and applications that allow users to share information and communicate with other users in a "social" setting.  Some school districts—most notably [[New York City]]'s -- have limited contact by [[public school]] teachers with students on [[Facebook]] and [[Twitter]], except on pages set up for classroom use.<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/02/nyregion/social-media-rules-for-nyc-school-staff-limits-contact-with-students.html?_r=1&hp</ref>
+
'''Social media''' -- a euphemism for [[gossip]] sites—is a term for websites and applications that allow users to share information and communicate with other users in a "social" setting.  Some school districts—most notably [[New York City]]'s -- have limited contact by [[public school]] teachers with students on [[Facebook]] and [[Twitter]], except on pages set up for classroom use.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/02/nyregion/social-media-rules-for-nyc-school-staff-limits-contact-with-students.html?_r=1&hp</ref>
  
 
==Characteristics of Users==
 
==Characteristics of Users==
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
==Criticism of Social Media==
 
==Criticism of Social Media==
 +
 +
{{see also|Social media censorship}}
  
 
Despite several social media websites boasting large numbers of users, active user percentages have slowed or declined in recent times.  For example, Facebook reported only a 1.7% month to month increase in active users.<ref>[http://www.buzzom.com/2011/06/facebooks-growth-rate-is-dropping-says-report/ Facebook’s Growth Rate is Dropping, says Report] Buzzom.com, June 13, 2011</ref>  Social media critics have noted that these sites often promote "hive-mind" behavior, where many users band together behind one ideology, usually liberalism.  In June 2011, users of the website [[Reddit]] crashed White House phone lines during a campaign calling for the legalisation of drugs.<ref>[http://caivn.org/article/2011/06/18/internet-activists-crash-white-house-phone-lines-calling-end-war-drugs INTERNET ACTIVISTS CRASH WHITE HOUSE PHONE LINES CALLING FOR AN END TO THE WAR ON DRUGS] CA Independent Voter Network, June 18, 2011</ref>
 
Despite several social media websites boasting large numbers of users, active user percentages have slowed or declined in recent times.  For example, Facebook reported only a 1.7% month to month increase in active users.<ref>[http://www.buzzom.com/2011/06/facebooks-growth-rate-is-dropping-says-report/ Facebook’s Growth Rate is Dropping, says Report] Buzzom.com, June 13, 2011</ref>  Social media critics have noted that these sites often promote "hive-mind" behavior, where many users band together behind one ideology, usually liberalism.  In June 2011, users of the website [[Reddit]] crashed White House phone lines during a campaign calling for the legalisation of drugs.<ref>[http://caivn.org/article/2011/06/18/internet-activists-crash-white-house-phone-lines-calling-end-war-drugs INTERNET ACTIVISTS CRASH WHITE HOUSE PHONE LINES CALLING FOR AN END TO THE WAR ON DRUGS] CA Independent Voter Network, June 18, 2011</ref>
Line 20: Line 22:
 
==Benefits of Social Media==
 
==Benefits of Social Media==
  
Republicans and conservatives [[Twitter#Prominence|have been able to utilize the social media site Twitter more than their Democratic counterparts]].  Success of [[Tea Party]] rallies are a result of organizers utilizing social media, such as Facebook and [[Twitter]], to engage volunteers and spread the word.<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/11/organizers-recipes-effective-tea-parties/ Organizers Give Recipes for Effective Tea Parties] Fox News, April 11, 2009</ref>  
+
Republicans and conservatives [[Twitter#Prominence|have been able to utilize the social media site Twitter more than their Democratic counterparts]].  Success of [[Tea Party]] rallies are a result of organizers utilizing social media, such as Facebook and [[Twitter]], to engage volunteers and spread the word.<ref>[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/11/organizers-recipes-effective-tea-parties/ Organizers Give Recipes for Effective Tea Parties] Fox News, April 11, 2009</ref>  
  
 
Employers have also used social media sites to vet potential employees, particularly to see if potential hires have engaged in sexist or racist commentary or displayed photos of illegal activities.<ref>[http://www.itworld.com/it-managementstrategy/176227/have-you-cleaned-your-facebook-profile-your-next-job-may-depend-it Cleaned up your Facebook profile yet? Your next job may depend on it.] IT World, June 21, 2011</ref>
 
Employers have also used social media sites to vet potential employees, particularly to see if potential hires have engaged in sexist or racist commentary or displayed photos of illegal activities.<ref>[http://www.itworld.com/it-managementstrategy/176227/have-you-cleaned-your-facebook-profile-your-next-job-may-depend-it Cleaned up your Facebook profile yet? Your next job may depend on it.] IT World, June 21, 2011</ref>
Line 27: Line 29:
  
 
== Various Social Media Sites==
 
== Various Social Media Sites==
* [[Wepluribus]] (conservative alternative to Facebook)
 
 
* [[Facebook]]
 
* [[Facebook]]
* [[Wikipedia]]
 
 
* [[Twitter]]
 
* [[Twitter]]
* [[LinkedIn]]
+
* LinkedIn
* [[Google Plus]]
+
* Discord
 
* [[MySpace]]
 
* [[MySpace]]
 
* [[YouTube]]
 
* [[YouTube]]
 
* [[Instagram]]
 
* [[Instagram]]
* [[Pinterest]]
+
* Pinterest
 
* [[Reddit]]
 
* [[Reddit]]
* [[WordPress]]
 
 
* Blogger
 
* Blogger
 
* [[World eSquare]]<ref>[http://www.900010000.com World eSquare]</ref>
 
* [[World eSquare]]<ref>[http://www.900010000.com World eSquare]</ref>
 +
* [[Google Plus]] (defunct)
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Line 47: Line 47:
 
* [[Yahoo]] and [[My Yahoo]]
 
* [[Yahoo]] and [[My Yahoo]]
 
* [[Bing]]
 
* [[Bing]]
* [[Edward J. Snowden]] - [[whistle blower]] of [[unconstitutional]] [[warrent]]less mass [[domestic surveillance]] by [[big government]] [[Police state]]
+
* [[Edward J. Snowden]]
 
* [[Unalienable rights]] of the [[Bill of Rights]]: [[First Amendment]], [[Fourth Amendment]], [[Fifth Amendment]]
 
* [[Unalienable rights]] of the [[Bill of Rights]]: [[First Amendment]], [[Fourth Amendment]], [[Fifth Amendment]]
 
* [[Right to Privacy]] and [[Common law privacy rights]]
 
* [[Right to Privacy]] and [[Common law privacy rights]]
Line 54: Line 54:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
+
{{reflist}}
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
* [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2257715/Study-shows-college-students-think-theyre-special--read-write-barely-study.html Social Media partly responsible in the rise of narcissism among college freshman.]
+
* [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2257715/Study-shows-college-students-think-theyre-special--read-write-barely-study.html Social Media partly responsible in the rise of narcissism among college freshman.]
 
* [http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700139450/Priest-cautions-flock-against-allowing-children-on-Facebook.html Priest cautions flock against allowing children on Facebook]
 
* [http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700139450/Priest-cautions-flock-against-allowing-children-on-Facebook.html Priest cautions flock against allowing children on Facebook]
* [http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/13/ask-matt-labash-the-social-media-scourge-embracing-the-new-dumbness-and-keeping-america-mediocre/ Ask Matt Labash: The social media scourge, embracing the new dumbness, and keeping America mediocre]
+
* [https://dailycaller.com/2011/07/13/ask-matt-labash-the-social-media-scourge-embracing-the-new-dumbness-and-keeping-america-mediocre/ Ask Matt Labash: The social media scourge, embracing the new dumbness, and keeping America mediocre]
 +
 
 +
{{Liberalism}}
  
[[Category:First Amendment]]
 
[[Category:Fourth Amendment]]
 
[[Category:Communication]]
 
 
[[Category:Online Social Networking]]
 
[[Category:Online Social Networking]]
 +
[[Category:Liberalism]]

Revision as of 22:02, October 22, 2020

Godsbook.jpg

Social media -- a euphemism for gossip sites—is a term for websites and applications that allow users to share information and communicate with other users in a "social" setting. Some school districts—most notably New York City's -- have limited contact by public school teachers with students on Facebook and Twitter, except on pages set up for classroom use.[1]

Characteristics of Users

Unfortunately, many users become addicted to such sites. 2010 statistics for Facebook show users spend more than 928 million hours per month playing online games.[2] This addictive behavior results in:

  • depression[3]
  • lower academic and job-related achievement by those who spend time there[Citation Needed]
  • interference with the development of good, lasting relationships
  • displacement of healthy social gatherings[4]
  • increased likelihood of divorce[5]
  • higher exposure to cyberbullying and other online threats.[6]

Social media experts and psychologists have noted that many users find the need to constantly update their status, check on the status of others or play games suffer from what is known as "Facebook Addiction Disorder." The "disorder" was shown to be prevalent in young people, as a study showed that college students who were asked to abstain from using Facebook for 24 hours experienced helplessness, loneliness, and anxiety.[7]

Criticism of Social Media

See also: Social media censorship

Despite several social media websites boasting large numbers of users, active user percentages have slowed or declined in recent times. For example, Facebook reported only a 1.7% month to month increase in active users.[8] Social media critics have noted that these sites often promote "hive-mind" behavior, where many users band together behind one ideology, usually liberalism. In June 2011, users of the website Reddit crashed White House phone lines during a campaign calling for the legalisation of drugs.[9]

Benefits of Social Media

Republicans and conservatives have been able to utilize the social media site Twitter more than their Democratic counterparts. Success of Tea Party rallies are a result of organizers utilizing social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, to engage volunteers and spread the word.[10]

Employers have also used social media sites to vet potential employees, particularly to see if potential hires have engaged in sexist or racist commentary or displayed photos of illegal activities.[11]

Politicians who embrace Facebook seem to enjoy a short-term boost in popularity followed by a long-term decline in credibility.[12]

Various Social Media Sites

See also

References

External links