Difference between revisions of "Richard Dawkins' commentary on Adolf Hitler"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
The interviewer wrote, regarding the Hitler comment, "I was stupefied. He had readily conceded that his own [[philosophy|philosophical]] position did not offer a rational basis for moral judgments. His intellectual honesty was refreshing, if somewhat disturbing on this point."<ref name=Hitler />
 
The interviewer wrote, regarding the Hitler comment, "I was stupefied. He had readily conceded that his own [[philosophy|philosophical]] position did not offer a rational basis for moral judgments. His intellectual honesty was refreshing, if somewhat disturbing on this point."<ref name=Hitler />
 +
== See also ==
 +
*[[Richard Dawkins and pseudoscience]]
 +
*[[Richard Dawkins, atheist atrocities, and historical revisionism]]
 +
*[[Richard Dawkins on child molestation and so called "gentle pedophiles"]]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist|3}}
 
{{reflist|3}}
 
[[Category: Richard Dawkins]]
 
[[Category: Richard Dawkins]]

Revision as of 08:50, May 21, 2010

Evolutionist and atheist Richard Dawkins said in an interview: “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question."[1]

When asked in an interview, "If we do not acknowledge some sort of external [standard], what is to prevent us from saying that the Muslim [extremists] aren’t right?", Richard Dawkins replied, "What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question. But whatever [defines morality], it’s not the Bible. If it was, we’d be stoning people for breaking the Sabbath."[1]

The interviewer wrote, regarding the Hitler comment, "I was stupefied. He had readily conceded that his own philosophical position did not offer a rational basis for moral judgments. His intellectual honesty was refreshing, if somewhat disturbing on this point."[1]

See also

References