Difference between revisions of "Postmodernism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Link)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Wexner Center.JPG|thumbnail|200px|right|The Wexner Center for the Arts at Ohio State University was the first postmodern architecture building.<ref>[https://blogs.thegospelcoalition.org/justintaylor/2014/01/13/ravi-zacharias-on-postmodern-architecture-at-ohio-state/ Ravi Zacharias on Postmodern Architecture at Ohio State]</ref> The architect of the first postmodern building said that he designed it with no design in mind.<ref>[https://blogs.thegospelcoalition.org/justintaylor/2014/01/13/ravi-zacharias-on-postmodern-architecture-at-ohio-state/ Ravi Zacharias on Postmodern Architecture at Ohio State]</ref> See: [[Atheism and architecture]] ]]
+
'''Postmodernism''' is the period of [[bourgeois society]] from the late 60s/early 70s up to the present, and in particular the cultural aspects of this period, characterised by the marginalisation of traditional (religious, kinship, custom, etc.) practice and belief and a disappearance of the prospect of achieving social harmony.
'''Postmodernism''' is an [[antichristian]],<ref>[http://books.google.ca/books?id=TLHM6mM1KkYC John F. MacArthur, "Think Biblically!"]</ref> far-left, 20th century [[worldview]] and [[academic]] movement characterized by denial of objective truth, and which [[stolen concept|asserts]] that assertions of [[objectivity|objective]] knowledge are essentially impossible.
+
  
The [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[Norman Geisler]] wrote about postmodernism: "In short, the root of Post-modernism is [[atheism]] and the fruit of it is [[relativism]] — relativism in every area of life and thought."<ref>[http://normangeisler.com/a-response-to-philosophical-postmodernism-2/ A Response to Philosophical Postmodernism] by [[Norman Geisler|Norman L. Geisler]]</ref> Atheists played a significant role in terms of postmodernist leadership and its following (see: [[Atheism and critical thinking#Atheism, postmodernism and a lack of critical thinking|Postmodernism and atheists]]). Furthermore, Jeff Myers and David A. Noebel note in their book ''Understanding the Times: A Survey of Competing Worldviews'' that "The [[British Broadcasting Corporation]] actually lists postmodernism as a subset of atheism."<ref>Understanding the Times: A Survey of Competing Worldviews By Jeff Myers and David A. Noebel, page 192 (endnote section)</ref> See also: [[Atheism and postmodernism]]
+
Once [[capitalism]], in the words of the ''[[The Communist Manifesto|Communist Manifesto]]'' “has left no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous ‘cash payment’ [and] drowned out the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation [and] resolved personal worth into exchange value”<ref>Karl Marx, ''Communist Manifesto'', Chapter 1</ref>, then the basis for postmodern society has been laid. Postmodern society is characterised by [[scepticism]] in relation to science, all forms of authority and the possibility of an ethical life, by [[relativism]] and disbelief in any concept of value beyond 'what pays', while the very ideas of originality, progress and truth seem themselves to be derivative, out-dated and untrue.
  
Arthur W. Lindsley, Ph.D., Senior Fellow, [[C.S. Lewis]] Institute, wrote:
+
== Historical context ==
{{cquote|Many postmodern contentions are self-refuting. An ancient example of this was the Greek philosopher Gorgius, who maintained that “All statements are false.” The problem is that if the statement that “All statements are false” is true, then it is false. Similarly, postmodernism maintains that it is (objectively) true to say that there are no objective truths. It uses reason to deny the validity of reason. If the statement, “all perspectives on reality are culturally determined” is true, then is this statement itself also culturally determined? If all metanarratives are suspect because they lead to oppression, then can it not be equally maintained that postmodernism is itself a metanarrative and equally suspect? If all knowledge claims are a grab for power, then are not postmodernism’s contentions equally motivated by a will-to-power?<ref>[ C.S. Lewis on Postmodernism?] by Arthur W. Lindsley, Ph.D.
+
Senior Fellow, C.S. Lewis Institute</ref>}}
+
  
A strong part of postmodernist thought is an intentional departure from traditional approaches that had previously been dominant. Postmodernity has influenced many disparate fields of study, such as architecture, history, literary criticism, art, and others.
+
The period of postmodernism began when the period of expansion of capitalism following the Second World War drew to a close. Belief in progress was bolstered after the devastation and barbarism of the Second World War, by the [[Marshall Plan]] and the [[Bretton Woods]] arrangements which allowed the dollar to be printed in unlimited amounts to finance the expansion of capitalism. This protracted [[Post-War Boom]] caused many former radicals to draw conclusions about the impossibility of rebellion and about capitalism having resolved its historic crisis. See for example [[Herbert Marcuse]]'s ''[[One-Dimensional Man]]''. [https://www.marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/64onedim/odmcontents.html]
  
The term "postmodernism" comes from the causal relationship the movement has to [[modernism]], rather than a temporal relationship. Both movements coexist today.
+
At roughly the same time that the Bretton Woods arrangements collapsed in 1968, the failure of the student uprisings and the betrayal of the French General Strike, caused a number of formerly radical French intellectuals to begin elaborating sceptical and subjective views, which incorporated elements of Marxist theory, and which laid the foundations for postmodern social theory. (See biographies of [[Roland Barthes]], [[Michel Foucault]], [[Jacques Lacan]] and [[Jacques Derrida]]). The [[Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia]], and other phenomena world-wide around this time demonstrated a rupture in the alliance between the workers' movement and the intelligentsia, an alliance which dated back to the [[Russian Revolution]] and before.
  
Some postmodernist ideas are:
+
Beginning already in the 1950s, but accelerating following the collapse of the Bretton Woods arrangements and the boom in commodity prices which followed, the dominant capitalist powers turned decisively from being net exporters of capital towards importing capital, and relocating their manufacturing industries to countries offering cheap labour, relying on military supremacy, financial power and knowledge and image industries to maintain their dominance. This led to a situation where the division of labour between mental and manual labour which had been around as long a civilisation and which forms the basis for the separation of theory and practice, was now articulated on an international scale, with whole countries securing their domination over other nations on the basis of military and financial power and the “symbolic industries”. Any wonder then, in those countries, that [[idealist]], sceptical and [[subjectivist]] outlooks became rampant, with writers theorising that “there is nothing outside of the text”. The same phenomena has been exhibited in the periods of decline of earlier civilisations. Especially as the limits on growth which were the root of the [[Environmental Movement]] became manifest, natural science lost the mystique it had held since the days of [[the Enlightenment]]. Social theory and [[Feminism|feminist]] and [[Marxism|Marxist]] ideas in particular were turned to demonstrate the limits of scientific knowledge. (See [[Jacques Monod]]'s ''[[Ethic of Knowledge]]'' [https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/monod.htm] and [[Jürgen Habermas]]'s ''[[Knowledge and Human Interest]]'' [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/habermas/1968/theory-knowledge.htm]).
  
* Truth is a "[[social construct]]," rather than objectively provable, and by extension is merely relative.
+
== See also ==
** As an extension of this, [[History]] is considered "fiction" or "storytelling"
+
* Human agency is the only thing allowing for ideals like peace, power, and control to actually have power since they themselves lack any despite being passed down for ages due to just being ideals.
+
* A society's choice of language reflects their general perceptions of the rules by which the world operates (see [[political correctness]]).
+
* There is no one superior culture; [[Western culture]] is no better than any other (see [[cultural relativism]]).  This often takes the form of ridicule of anything deemed to be part of [[traditional values]] or mainstream [[American]] culture.
+
* Insanity is simply a cultural creation.
+
* Traditional authority has a strong tendency to be false and corrupt.
+
* Morality is personal with tradition playing little to no role in it, and as such, "right" and "wrong" is solely a matter of perspective (see [[moral relativism]]).
+
* The frequent use of irony and humorous [[wordplay]] to shift the meanings of words is encouraged as this causes people to rethink their assumptions about culture and language.
+
* [[Gender role]]s, [[sexuality]] and [[race]] are socially constructed, not [[inborn traits]].
+
* The only way towards peace is by embracing [[Globalism|international unity]], as [[nationalism]] causes wars.
+
  
Critics of postmodernism include those who believe in an objective truth that can be explored by human means, among others.
+
* [[Post-truth]]
 +
* [[Post-structuralism]]
 +
* [[Cultural Marxism]]
  
==History==
+
== Further reading ==
Postmodernism is the work of three primary French writers: [[Jean-François Lyotard]], who coined the term "postmodern"; [[Jacques Derrida]], and especially [[Michel Foucault]].  Foucault started off as a young Marxist<ref>[https://read.dukeupress.edu/positions/article-abstract/27/1/115/137351/The-Hidden-Area-between-Marx-and-Foucault?redirectedFrom=fulltext The Hidden Area between Marx and Foucault]</ref> under the tutelage of Louis Althusser, joining the French Communist Party in the 1950s.  He moved on from this, however, and became an author and formulator of his own ideas.
+
  
Through his work, Foucault re-purposes Marxism into a philosophy that can be used in any category, not just economics. Foucault sees life through interactions, and every interaction has a [[Power|power]] dynamic.  Because of this, there is no truth, and instead there are only power-knowledge interactions.<ref>[https://muse.jhu.edu/article/731488 Foucault with Marx]</ref>  Each interaction has a winner and loser, thus everything can be interchanged. In his book ''Discipline and Punish'', Foucault wrote:
+
*[[Frederic Jameson]]'s ''[[Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]]'' [https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/jameson.htm]
 +
*[[Jean-Francois Lyotard]]'s '' [[The Postmodern Condition]]'' [https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/lyotard.htm]
 +
*[[Michel Foucault]]'s ''[[Archaeology of Knowledge]]'' [https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/foucault.htm]
 +
*[[Teresa Ebert]]'s ''[[Untimely Critiques for a Red Feminism]]'' [https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/ebert.htm]
  
<blockquote>Perhaps we should abandon a whole tradition that allows us to imagine that knowledge can exist only where the power relations are suspended and that knowledge can develop only outside its injunctions, its demands, and its interests. Perhaps we should abandon the belief that power makes people mad and that, by the same token, the renunciation of power is one of the conditions of knowledge. We should admit, rather, that power produces knowledge (and not simply by encouraging it because it serves power or by applying it because it is useful); that power and knowledge directly imply one another; that there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.</blockquote>
+
== References ==
 
+
{{MIAE}}
Within the framework of postmodernist "power relations", the denial of independent knowledge is linked at the same time with the denial of independent individuality.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=kAwvotBDTp8C&pg=PA129 Postmodernism and Its Critics]</ref>  Once we arrive at a place where there is no independent knowledge nor independent individuals, truth only exists at the will of some power that can be overcome.  Thus, there is no independent truth, every truth is merely someone else's "truth".
+
 
+
==Postmodernism, anti-Americanism, and reverse racism==
+
Postmodernism is routinely used by academics to attack American interventionist foreign policy, claiming that democratic society is only an aspect of western society, which should not be "forced" upon other peoples, whose cultures may be despotic or theocratic.  In this regard, postmodernism is simply a [[euphemism]] for [[moral relativism]] (itself a euphemism for [[sin denial]]).
+
 
+
It is likewise used to attack and condemn the work and culture of white males, by claiming that any such cultural output, be it art, music, literature, etc., is patriarchal and imperialistic. 
+
 
+
== Antichristian ==
+
Postmodernists seek to denigrate [[Christianity]] and its accomplishments by claiming that it is only an aspect of western culture, and not inherently true.  Likewise they denigrate the strong Christian [[scientific]] tradition, and attempt to marginalize Christian historical figures such as [[Isaac Newton]].
+
 
+
Postmodernists rely on the antichristian and [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] psychological theories of [[Atheism|atheist]] [[Sigmund Freud]] to draw whatever meanings they want out of texts, in a method called "psychoanalytical criticism."
+
 
+
==Postmodernism and immorality==
+
As postmodernism teaches that there is no truth, it likewise teaches that there is no absolute [[morality]].  Within this worldview, any action is moral or justifiable, and postmodernism's spread among academia may go some way to explaining [[professor values]].
+
 
+
==Discredited==
+
Alan Sokal famously exposed postmodernism as deeply flawed in 1996 by successfully publishing nonsense in a postmodern journal.<ref>http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/index.html</ref> Since then, postmodernism has largely been considered a laughingstock among all but the most liberal academics.
+
 
+
==See also==
+
* [[Deconstruction]]
+
* [[Atheism and critical thinking]]
+
* [[Atheism and postmodernism]]
+
* [[Nihilism]]
+
* [[Dada]] - an early pre-cursor to postmodernist expression
+
 
+
==References==
+
{{reflist|1}}
+
 
+
== External links ==
+
*[https://areomagazine.com/2017/03/27/how-french-intellectuals-ruined-the-west-postmodernism-and-its-impact-explained/ How French “Intellectuals” Ruined the West: Postmodernism and Its Impact, Explained]
+
*[http://thirdmill.org/files/reformedperspectives/hall_of_frame/HOF.Hale.Derrida%20and%20VanTil.6.30.04.html Derrida, Van Til and the Metaphysics of Postmodernism] An appraisal of Postmodernism, specifically Deconstruction, in light of Van Til by Jacob Gabriel Hale.
+
 
+
[[Category:Artistic Movements]]
+
[[Category:Culture]]
+
[[Category:Philosophical Systems‏‎]]
+
[[Category:Worldviews]]
+

Revision as of 16:00, January 5, 2021

Postmodernism is the period of bourgeois society from the late 60s/early 70s up to the present, and in particular the cultural aspects of this period, characterised by the marginalisation of traditional (religious, kinship, custom, etc.) practice and belief and a disappearance of the prospect of achieving social harmony.

Once capitalism, in the words of the Communist Manifesto “has left no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous ‘cash payment’ [and] drowned out the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation [and] resolved personal worth into exchange value”[1], then the basis for postmodern society has been laid. Postmodern society is characterised by scepticism in relation to science, all forms of authority and the possibility of an ethical life, by relativism and disbelief in any concept of value beyond 'what pays', while the very ideas of originality, progress and truth seem themselves to be derivative, out-dated and untrue.

Historical context

The period of postmodernism began when the period of expansion of capitalism following the Second World War drew to a close. Belief in progress was bolstered after the devastation and barbarism of the Second World War, by the Marshall Plan and the Bretton Woods arrangements which allowed the dollar to be printed in unlimited amounts to finance the expansion of capitalism. This protracted Post-War Boom caused many former radicals to draw conclusions about the impossibility of rebellion and about capitalism having resolved its historic crisis. See for example Herbert Marcuse's One-Dimensional Man. [1]

At roughly the same time that the Bretton Woods arrangements collapsed in 1968, the failure of the student uprisings and the betrayal of the French General Strike, caused a number of formerly radical French intellectuals to begin elaborating sceptical and subjective views, which incorporated elements of Marxist theory, and which laid the foundations for postmodern social theory. (See biographies of Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan and Jacques Derrida). The Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, and other phenomena world-wide around this time demonstrated a rupture in the alliance between the workers' movement and the intelligentsia, an alliance which dated back to the Russian Revolution and before.

Beginning already in the 1950s, but accelerating following the collapse of the Bretton Woods arrangements and the boom in commodity prices which followed, the dominant capitalist powers turned decisively from being net exporters of capital towards importing capital, and relocating their manufacturing industries to countries offering cheap labour, relying on military supremacy, financial power and knowledge and image industries to maintain their dominance. This led to a situation where the division of labour between mental and manual labour which had been around as long a civilisation and which forms the basis for the separation of theory and practice, was now articulated on an international scale, with whole countries securing their domination over other nations on the basis of military and financial power and the “symbolic industries”. Any wonder then, in those countries, that idealist, sceptical and subjectivist outlooks became rampant, with writers theorising that “there is nothing outside of the text”. The same phenomena has been exhibited in the periods of decline of earlier civilisations. Especially as the limits on growth which were the root of the Environmental Movement became manifest, natural science lost the mystique it had held since the days of the Enlightenment. Social theory and feminist and Marxist ideas in particular were turned to demonstrate the limits of scientific knowledge. (See Jacques Monod's Ethic of Knowledge [2] and Jürgen Habermas's Knowledge and Human Interest [3]).

See also

Further reading

References

Template:MIAE
  1. Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto, Chapter 1