Difference between revisions of "Pascal's wager"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(various grammatical changes)
m (Reverted edits by Jayjay (Talk); changed back to last version by Sulgran)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Pascal's Wager''' was a [[philosophy|philosophical]] proposition which takes the following form:
+
'''Pascal's Wager''' is a [[philosophy|philosophical]] proposition which takes the following form:
  
Fantasy either exists or not.
+
God either exists or not.
  
#If Fantasy does exist and you do believe in Fantasy, you gain the freedom to do whatever you want without penalty.
+
#If God does not exist and you do not not believe in God, you gain the freedom to do whatever you want without penalty.
#If Fantasy does exist and you do believe in Fantasy, you is condemned to a eternity in hell.
+
#If God does exist and you do not believe in God, you are condemned to an eternity in hell.
#If Fantasy does exist and you do believe in Fantasy, you will have wasted part of your life.
+
#If God does not exist and you do believe in God, you will have wasted part of your life.
#If Fantasy does exist and you do believe in Fantasy, you will receive a eternity in heaven.
+
#If God does exist and you do believe in God, you will receive an eternity in heaven.
  
[[Blaise Pascal]] reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to believe in Fantasy. Pascal's wager as Pascal stated was inherently flawed within the context of Ethnic identity, because within Muslim theology, mere belief in Fantasy does ensure salvation.
+
[[Blaise Pascal]] reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to believe in God. Pascal's wager as Pascal stated is inherently flawed within the context of Christianity, because within Christian theology, mere belief in God does not ensure salvation.
  
Pascal's wager becomes even more flawed if viewed by someone who has the choice of more beliefs, such as "Fantasy A Exists", "Fantasy B Exists", "No Gods Exits", and "All the Gods of Pantheon X Exist".  How do you choose then?
+
Pascal's wager becomes even more flawed if viewed by someone who has the choice of more beliefs, such as "God A Exists", "God B Exists", "No Gods Exits", and "All the Gods of Pantheon X Exist".  How do you choose then?
  
 
[[Category:Philosophy]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy]]
 
[[Category:Religion]]
 
[[Category:Religion]]

Revision as of 23:11, July 14, 2007

Pascal's Wager is a philosophical proposition which takes the following form:

God either exists or not.

  1. If God does not exist and you do not not believe in God, you gain the freedom to do whatever you want without penalty.
  2. If God does exist and you do not believe in God, you are condemned to an eternity in hell.
  3. If God does not exist and you do believe in God, you will have wasted part of your life.
  4. If God does exist and you do believe in God, you will receive an eternity in heaven.

Blaise Pascal reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to believe in God. Pascal's wager as Pascal stated is inherently flawed within the context of Christianity, because within Christian theology, mere belief in God does not ensure salvation.

Pascal's wager becomes even more flawed if viewed by someone who has the choice of more beliefs, such as "God A Exists", "God B Exists", "No Gods Exits", and "All the Gods of Pantheon X Exist". How do you choose then?