Difference between revisions of "Liberal tricks"
From Conservapedia
(Reworded) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
# So as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. <ref>[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008 </ref> | # So as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], [[Barack Obama]] insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. <ref>[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/16/obama-and-mccain-try-to-woo-conservative-voters-at-forum/ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum] Fox News, August 16, 2008 </ref> | ||
− | # Inserting | + | # Inserting a [[liberal]] assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic "when did you stop beating your wife?!" |
− | # Distracting and disrupting reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage | + | # Distracting and disrupting reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage |
# Making arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the liberal himself<ref>For example, one might conclude that [[Michael Moore]] makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.</ref> | # Making arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the liberal himself<ref>For example, one might conclude that [[Michael Moore]] makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.</ref> | ||
# Pretending that liberals do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable<ref>For example, people who insist on promoting [[abortion]] with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely "pro-choice".</ref> | # Pretending that liberals do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable<ref>For example, people who insist on promoting [[abortion]] with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely "pro-choice".</ref> | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
# In court decisions, holding in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[liberal]] reasons that will be cited for liberal outcomes in ''future'' cases<ref>''See, e.g.'', ''[[Everson v. Board of Education|Everson v. Board of Ed.]]''</ref> | # In court decisions, holding in favor of the [[conservative]] side by using [[liberal]] reasons that will be cited for liberal outcomes in ''future'' cases<ref>''See, e.g.'', ''[[Everson v. Board of Education|Everson v. Board of Ed.]]''</ref> | ||
# [[Liberal]]s [[liberal friendship|befriending]] you so that you become liberal. (Conversely, why don't they become [[conservative]]?) | # [[Liberal]]s [[liberal friendship|befriending]] you so that you become liberal. (Conversely, why don't they become [[conservative]]?) | ||
− | # Citing "live and let live!" except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other liberal issue | + | # Citing "live and let live!" except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other liberal issue |
− | # Citing "it doesn't hurt to try!" (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as premarital sex, worshiping many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion | + | # Citing "it doesn't hurt to try!" (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as premarital sex, worshiping many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion) |
− | # | + | # everyone else supposedly believes in something so it must be right |
− | # | + | # your [[parent]]s aren't cool; [[Hollywood values]] are cool; [[professor values]] are brilliant; blindly follow your government |
− | # | + | # there is a shortage of everything we want |
− | # [[ | + | # [[prayer]] is for dummies, or is antiquated |
− | # [[children| | + | # [[children|kids]] are getting smarter than old folks |
− | # Smearing your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation | + | # Smearing your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation |
− | # Calling someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a ''liberal'' that happens to have a different skin color | + | # Calling someone a [[racist]] if he criticizes a ''liberal'' that happens to have a different skin color |
− | # Demonizing [[conservative]]s and pretending they don't care about regular people | + | # Demonizing [[conservative]]s and pretending they don't care about regular people |
# if you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed''). | # if you don't like it (something offensive on [[television]]), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for ''if you don't like [[whale]]s being killed, don't watch them being killed''). | ||
# Believing the poor are blameless because they have nothing and the rich are to blame because they have everything. | # Believing the poor are blameless because they have nothing and the rich are to blame because they have everything. | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
# Inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works. | # Inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works. | ||
# Defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. (We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.) | # Defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the [[Democratic]] party. (We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.) | ||
− | # Claiming expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a "Dr." or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty | + | # Claiming expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a "Dr." or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty |
− | # | + | # Pretending an honorary degree does not give someone the right to be called "Doctor" |
# Pretending [[affirmative action]] is the best way to fill positions, including [[Affirmative action president|President of the U.S.]] | # Pretending [[affirmative action]] is the best way to fill positions, including [[Affirmative action president|President of the U.S.]] | ||
# Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, [[Americans]] get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore [[oil drilling]] leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” <ref>[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36268 Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year] CNSNews, September 24, 2008</ref> | # Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, [[Americans]] get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore [[oil drilling]] leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” <ref>[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36268 Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year] CNSNews, September 24, 2008</ref> |
Revision as of 21:04, July 5, 2009
Here are some common liberal tricks that many people fall for:
- So as not to show his true beliefs of supporting evil infanticide and taxpayer-funded abortion, Barack Obama insists he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion. [1]
- Inserting a liberal assumption into a question, as illustrated by the classic "when did you stop beating your wife?!"
- Distracting and disrupting reasoned discussion, as in stating irrelevant claims, inconsequential tales of personal experience, or false outrage
- Making arguments that have superficial appeal to the dimwitted, but are actually nonsensical and probably not believed by the liberal himself[2]
- Pretending that liberals do not have a political point of view, but are just being reasonable[3]
- Exaggerating praise for fellow liberals.[4]
- Pretending that atheism equals intelligence.
- In court decisions, holding in favor of the conservative side by using liberal reasons that will be cited for liberal outcomes in future cases[5]
- Liberals befriending you so that you become liberal. (Conversely, why don't they become conservative?)
- Citing "live and let live!" except when it comes to praying aloud in school, keeping the money you earn, building on your own property, and every other liberal issue
- Citing "it doesn't hurt to try!" (In reference to drugs, alcohol, and other immoral behaviors such as premarital sex, worshiping many gods/no gods, homosexuality, or abortion)
- everyone else supposedly believes in something so it must be right
- your parents aren't cool; Hollywood values are cool; professor values are brilliant; blindly follow your government
- there is a shortage of everything we want
- prayer is for dummies, or is antiquated
- kids are getting smarter than old folks
- Smearing your adversary with a highly offensive accusation or insinuation
- Calling someone a racist if he criticizes a liberal that happens to have a different skin color
- Demonizing conservatives and pretending they don't care about regular people
- if you don't like it (something offensive on television), don't watch it (but they don't seem to go for if you don't like whales being killed, don't watch them being killed).
- Believing the poor are blameless because they have nothing and the rich are to blame because they have everything.
- Accusing conservatives of libel, but forgetting that truth is the perfect defense against libel.
- In discounting other point of views, liberals use comparisons of other known "wrong actions" to justify their supposed correct stance. [6]
- Inserting false information, usually lewd into a respected work or group of works.
- Defending the assuration that democrats.com is not affiliated with the Democratic party. (We are told as an independent website, Democrats do not control the views of democrats.com.)
- Claiming expertise beyond one's area of expertise, as in a "Dr." or professor implying that he is an expert in an area beyond his specialty
- Pretending an honorary degree does not give someone the right to be called "Doctor"
- Pretending affirmative action is the best way to fill positions, including President of the U.S.
- Fearing the wrath of voters this election cycle, Democrats have decided not to block offshore drilling bans renewed each October. After the election, Americans get sucker-punched because restoring the ban on new offshore oil drilling leases “will be a top priority for discussion next year.” [7]
(please add to list)
Example
Here is an example of an actual attempt at liberal tricks that was posted on this very page:
This article, and many others on a similar line, are a sad demonstration of incipient mental illness. Andrew Schlafly appears to be an educated man - after all, he edited a legal journal which was later edited by Barack Obama (I assume that Andy's tenure wasn't a result of affirmative action in favour of the narrow minded and the bigoted) - yet his denunciations of 'liberalism' get ever wilder and more paranoid as his definition of that beknighted state become ever more encompassing.
The above example (by a non-American) attempts to smear a conservative by implying that he has a mental illness, reflecting liberal trick #17 above. To someone unfamiliar with liberal tricks, this can be upsetting and intimidating. But once one realizes that this is a basic trick from the liberal playbook, its silliness and ineffectiveness becomes obvious. The liberal's foolish tactic is then revealed for what it really is.
References
- ↑ Obama, McCain’s Abortion Positions Contrast Sharply at Faith Forum Fox News, August 16, 2008
- ↑ For example, one might conclude that Michael Moore makes silly statements designed to appeal to the less intelligent.
- ↑ For example, people who insist on promoting abortion with mandatory taxpayer funding claim they are merely "pro-choice".
- ↑ For example, liberal praise by law professors for Barack Obama borders on the absurd.
- ↑ See, e.g., Everson v. Board of Ed.
- ↑ http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/07/hanson-earth-at-crisis-point/ , AFP Hansen, Earth At A Crisis Point, April 7, 2008
- ↑ Democrat Leader: Restoring Offshore Drilling Ban a ‘Top Priority’ for Next Year CNSNews, September 24, 2008
|