Difference between revisions of "Last wordism"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Some argue that '''last wordism''' is often a characteristic of "less intellectually robust presentations."<ref>http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/books/reviews/CaseforChrist.pdf</ref> | Some argue that '''last wordism''' is often a characteristic of "less intellectually robust presentations."<ref>http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/books/reviews/CaseforChrist.pdf</ref> | ||
− | '''Last wordism''' reflects a lack of restraint, a characteristic of wrongdoing or [[sin]]. The ultimate in '''last wordism''' was men choosing to [[Crucifixion|crucify]] [[Jesus]], to which God responded with the [[Resurrection of Christ]]. | + | '''Last wordism''' reflects a lack of restraint, a characteristic of wrongdoing or [[sin]]. The ultimate in '''last wordism''' was men choosing to [[Crucifixion|crucify]] [[Jesus]], to which God responded with the [[resurrection of Jesus Christ|Resurrection of Jesus Christ]]. |
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 11:16, May 15, 2008
Last wordism is the belief that victory can be obtained in a debate or discussion by having the "last word." Some argue that last wordism is often a characteristic of "less intellectually robust presentations."[1]
Last wordism reflects a lack of restraint, a characteristic of wrongdoing or sin. The ultimate in last wordism was men choosing to crucify Jesus, to which God responded with the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.