Difference between revisions of "Last wordism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Section was speculation and not fact. Did not have a citation.)
m (Reverted edits by TurtleD (talk) to last revision by DanielPulido)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
When '''last wordism''' is correctly identified, it often betrays the weaknesses of  "less intellectually robust presentations."<ref>http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/books/reviews/CaseforChrist.pdf</ref>
 
When '''last wordism''' is correctly identified, it often betrays the weaknesses of  "less intellectually robust presentations."<ref>http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/books/reviews/CaseforChrist.pdf</ref>
  
 +
At best, last wordism is childish.  At worst, it reflects a lack of restraint or [[bullying]], a characteristic of wrongdoing or [[sin]].
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 18:22, 20 September 2012

Last wordism is a tactic used in a debate or discussion, resorted to in the belief that victory can be obtained by having the "last word." A statement can be identified as last wordism if it adds no new substance to an argument; it is intended to achieve its effect through recency[1] rather than through relevance.

When last wordism is correctly identified, it often betrays the weaknesses of "less intellectually robust presentations."[2]

At best, last wordism is childish. At worst, it reflects a lack of restraint or bullying, a characteristic of wrongdoing or sin.

References

  1. "Recency" is the state of being "recent", as in "most recent."
  2. http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/books/reviews/CaseforChrist.pdf