Difference between revisions of "Jonathan Sarfati"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Sarfati and Chess: removed editorializing)
(Sarfati and Chess)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
== Sarfati and Chess ==
 
== Sarfati and Chess ==
  
Sarfati's current [[FIDE]] rating is a modest 2244. His highest achieved rating is 2305<ref>http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=39623</ref>, 500 points less than [[Veselin Topalov]].
+
Sarfati's current [[FIDE]] rating is a 2244. His highest achieved rating is 2305<ref>http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=39623</ref>, 500 points less than [[Veselin Topalov]].
  
 
== Sarfati on Wikipedia ==
 
== Sarfati on Wikipedia ==

Revision as of 05:45, April 18, 2009

Jonathansafarti.jpg

Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D. is a Creationist scientist and author, and master chess player from New Zealand and Australia. He is affiliated with Creation Ministries International (formerly Answers in Genesis) in Brisbane, Australia. He has authored a paper in the top-of-the line journal Nature[1] and drew a chess game against world champion Boris Spassky and was for a time the chess champion of New Zealand.[2] Sarfati has used his intelligence and extensive knowledge of science to demonstrate the many holes in the theory of evolution such as the impossibility of life arising from non-life.

Sarfati is a Hebrew Christian, that is, a Jew who accepts Jesus as his Lord and Savior. He has repeatedly and powerfully attacked liberalism, liberal activist judges, as well as defended Biblical morality against liberal causes like abortion and gay "marriage". [3] [4] [5]

Sarfati and Chess

Sarfati's current FIDE rating is a 2244. His highest achieved rating is 2305[6], 500 points less than Veselin Topalov.

Sarfati on Wikipedia

Sarfati chess.jpg

In 2006, evolutionist administrators at Wikipedia attempted to turn the Wikipedia page about Sarfati into an attack piece. This went so far as to go to Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee.[7] After the evolutionists were not allowed to have their way, they twice tried to get the article deleted.[8][9]

References

External links