Difference between revisions of "Human being"
From Conservapedia
AManInBlack (Talk | contribs) (This changes the meaning a bit, but it explains why humans being created in the image of God is relevant. Dogs or rhinos or ants can't think or have faith or free will, but people can) |
AManInBlack (Talk | contribs) (I THINK this means what I mean. Philosphical = there is no soul, methodological = we can't measure a soul) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Human being''' is a term for a [[homo sapiens|human]] that empasizes the role of a human not merely as a social animal, but a thinking person. Human beings were created in the image of [[God]], according to Judaism and Christianity. "Male and female He created them." (Genesis 1) | '''Human being''' is a term for a [[homo sapiens|human]] that empasizes the role of a human not merely as a social animal, but a thinking person. Human beings were created in the image of [[God]], according to Judaism and Christianity. "Male and female He created them." (Genesis 1) | ||
| − | Scientists, educators, philosphers, and sociologists who embrace the perspective of [[philosophical naturalism]] deliberately overlook man's spiritual nature. | + | Scientists, educators, philosphers, and sociologists who embrace the perspective of [[philosophical naturalism]] deliberately overlook man's spiritual nature, and [[methodogical naturalism]] deliberately overlooks the possibility that human nature is dictated, controlled, or influenced by any influences that cannot be measured. |
Academic scholarship related to human beings falls under any of the following fields of study: | Academic scholarship related to human beings falls under any of the following fields of study: | ||
Revision as of 15:31, July 13, 2007
Human being is a term for a human that empasizes the role of a human not merely as a social animal, but a thinking person. Human beings were created in the image of God, according to Judaism and Christianity. "Male and female He created them." (Genesis 1)
Scientists, educators, philosphers, and sociologists who embrace the perspective of philosophical naturalism deliberately overlook man's spiritual nature, and methodogical naturalism deliberately overlooks the possibility that human nature is dictated, controlled, or influenced by any influences that cannot be measured.
Academic scholarship related to human beings falls under any of the following fields of study:
