Difference between revisions of "Homo naledi"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://edition.cnn.com → https://edition.cnn.com)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Homo naledi''' is an assumed ancestor of modern humans. Discovered in a deep cave in South Africa, the many fossil finds, comprising of 15 individuals<ref>http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/10/africa/homo-naledi-human-relative-species/</ref>, have not yet been dated by any means but are assumed to some of the oldest fossil finds. They displayed the interesting characteristic of being buried in the cave which, if true, would be the oldest burial chamber ever discovered - though much more work needs to be done.
+
'''Homo naledi''' is an assumed ancestor of modern humans. Discovered in a deep cave in South Africa, the many fossil finds, comprising of 15 individuals,<ref>https://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/10/africa/homo-naledi-human-relative-species/</ref> have not yet been dated by any means but are assumed to some of the oldest fossil finds. They displayed the interesting characteristic of being buried in the cave which, if true, would be the oldest burial chamber ever discovered - though much more work needs to be done.
  
 
Creationist [[Ken Ham]] has provided a creationist rebuttal to the initial claims<ref>https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2015/09/10/supposed-human-ancestor-found/</ref>
 
Creationist [[Ken Ham]] has provided a creationist rebuttal to the initial claims<ref>https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2015/09/10/supposed-human-ancestor-found/</ref>

Latest revision as of 15:03, April 9, 2019

Homo naledi is an assumed ancestor of modern humans. Discovered in a deep cave in South Africa, the many fossil finds, comprising of 15 individuals,[1] have not yet been dated by any means but are assumed to some of the oldest fossil finds. They displayed the interesting characteristic of being buried in the cave which, if true, would be the oldest burial chamber ever discovered - though much more work needs to be done.

Creationist Ken Ham has provided a creationist rebuttal to the initial claims[2]

References

  1. https://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/10/africa/homo-naledi-human-relative-species/
  2. https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2015/09/10/supposed-human-ancestor-found/