Difference between revisions of "Faith and science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (improved)
(top: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: Consequently → Consequently,)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Faith and science''' are two complementary approaches to understanding the world.   
+
'''Faith and logic''' are essential ingredients of real [[science]] and an informed understanding the world.   
  
[[Faith]], a [[Christian]] concept, accepts truth without requiring visible proof.
+
*[[Faith]], a [[Christian]] concept, accepts truth without requiring visible proof.
 
+
*[[Logic]] guides the faculty of human reason to determine the truth. However, [[liberal logic]] may appear logical, but is actually nonsensical.
[[Science]] is based on observation in determining the truth.
+
*[[Science]] is based on observation in determining the truth. However, in recent years, science has become increasingly [[atheism|atheistic]],<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> rejecting God and his works in explanations of the world and all of human experience. Instead readily embracing pseudo or [[junk science]] such as [[Counterexamples to Evolution|evolution]], [[Counterexamples to Relativity|relativity]], [[global warming]] and much of [[cosmology]] and [[geology]] based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]]. Consequently, the rigid logic of [[creation science]] is gaining in importance, enabling intelligent people to distinguish real science from atheistic secular junk science.
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
  
 
* [[Debate:Which is better: science or religion?]]
 
* [[Debate:Which is better: science or religion?]]
 +
 +
==References==
 +
{{Reflist}}
 
[[Category:Religion]]
 
[[Category:Religion]]
 
[[Category:Science]]
 
[[Category:Science]]

Latest revision as of 14:40, June 24, 2016

Faith and logic are essential ingredients of real science and an informed understanding the world.

  • Faith, a Christian concept, accepts truth without requiring visible proof.
  • Logic guides the faculty of human reason to determine the truth. However, liberal logic may appear logical, but is actually nonsensical.
  • Science is based on observation in determining the truth. However, in recent years, science has become increasingly atheistic,[1] rejecting God and his works in explanations of the world and all of human experience. Instead readily embracing pseudo or junk science such as evolution, relativity, global warming and much of cosmology and geology based on a time frame which predates creation. Consequently, the rigid logic of creation science is gaining in importance, enabling intelligent people to distinguish real science from atheistic secular junk science.

See also

References