Difference between revisions of "Daniel Brandt"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Wikipedia biography deletion wheel-war and arbitration case: fix)
(Wikipedia biography deletion wheel-war and arbitration case: bit)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Wikipedia biography deletion wheel-war and arbitration case ==
 
== Wikipedia biography deletion wheel-war and arbitration case ==
Brandt's article on Wikipedia was repeatedly deleted and restored, which eventually led to an arbitration case before the Arbitration Committee;<ref name=ArbCom>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Daniel_Brandt_deletion_wheel_war Wikipedia Arbitration case]</ref> this practice on Wikipedia is known as "wheel-warring", and is "looked down" upon by the Wikipedia community.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators Wikipedia administrator policy]</ref>
+
Brandt's article on Wikipedia was repeatedly deleted and restored, which eventually led to an arbitration case before the Arbitration Committee;<ref name=ArbCom>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Daniel_Brandt_deletion_wheel_war Wikipedia Arbitration case]</ref> the "highest tier" of the administrator-run site.<ref>Kohs, Gregory. [http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikipedia-arbitration-committee-member-resigns-under-plagiarism-cloud "Wikipedia Arbitration Committee member resigns under plagiarism cloud"], Examiner.com, 1 November 2010</ref> The Arbitration Committee claims that their role on Wikipedia is to "impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve."<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee Wikipedia Arbitration Committee page]</ref> this practice on Wikipedia is known as "wheel-warring", and is "looked down" upon by the Wikipedia community.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators Wikipedia administrator policy]</ref>
  
 
Thrice in October 2005, Brandt's article was deleted for notability reasons;<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Daniel+Brandt Daniel Brandt article deletion log]</ref> this was not part of the conflict.<ref name=ArbCom/>
 
Thrice in October 2005, Brandt's article was deleted for notability reasons;<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Daniel+Brandt Daniel Brandt article deletion log]</ref> this was not part of the conflict.<ref name=ArbCom/>
 
<ref>Kohs, Gregory. [http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikipedia-arbitration-committee-member-resigns-under-plagiarism-cloud "Wikipedia Arbitration Committee member resigns under plagiarism cloud"], Examiner.com, 1 November 2010</ref>
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Reflist}}

Revision as of 22:24, 25 January 2012

Daniel Brandt is best known for founding the site Wikipedia Watch, which caused scandals by revealing identities of Wikipedians.[1]

Wikipedia biography deletion wheel-war and arbitration case

Brandt's article on Wikipedia was repeatedly deleted and restored, which eventually led to an arbitration case before the Arbitration Committee;[2] the "highest tier" of the administrator-run site.[3] The Arbitration Committee claims that their role on Wikipedia is to "impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve."[4] this practice on Wikipedia is known as "wheel-warring", and is "looked down" upon by the Wikipedia community.[5]

Thrice in October 2005, Brandt's article was deleted for notability reasons;[6] this was not part of the conflict.[2]

References