Difference between revisions of "Apartheid"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Verwoerd and the Bantustans)
(Apartheid 2.0: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.bbc.com → https://www.bbc.com)
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Apartheid''' (Afrikaans: ''separateness''), was a social and political policy of racial [[segregation]] which was enforced by white minority governments in [[South Africa]] from 1948 to 1994.
+
{{Cquote|'''Apartheid is an affront to human rights and human dignity. Normal and friendly relations cannot exist between the United States and South Africa until it becomes a dead policy. Americans are of one mind and one heart on this issue.''' [[Ronald Reagan]]<ref>http://cnsnews.com/commentary/patrick-j-buchanan/reagan-was-right-south-africa</ref>}}
 +
'''Apartheid''' (meaning ''separateness'' in [[Afrikaans language|Afrikaans]]), was a social, economic and political policy of racial [[segregation]] which was enforced by white minority governments in [[South Africa]] from 1948 until June 17, 1991 when the final Apartheid laws were abolished in Parliament. A form of apartheid still exists, however, this time against light-skinned people. A Black socialist majority has implemented race-based [[Nazi]]-style seizure laws against white people.
  
 
==Verwoerd and the Bantustans==
 
==Verwoerd and the Bantustans==
Laws passed in 1950 forced a separation of non-whites from whites in South African society.  The first, the ''Population Registration Act'', which had people register with a racial classification board to determine "officially" if they belonged to one of four racial groups: white, African, colored, or Indian. The second, the Group Areas Act, relocated the different races the few mixed-race communities into segregated areas; the non-white immigrants, especially the Africans, were ordered to carry passbooks to go from place to place in white areas. [http://overcomingapartheid.msu.edu/unit.php?id=5&page=2] Likewise, whites were ordered to relocate from the areas which they settled, that historically belonged to blacks.
+
Laws passed in 1950 forced a separation of non-whites from whites in South African society.  The first, the ''Population Registration Act'', had people register with a racial classification board to determine "officially" if they belonged to one of four racial groups: White, African, or Coloured (the later split into Coloured and Indian). The second, the Group Areas Act, was the enforced relocation of non-whites into designated urban areas; to compel these people into the new "townships", which were in essence little more than shanty towns. The government ordered the bulldozing of once-vibrant mixed-race communities; the non-white inhabitants, especially the Africans, were ordered to carry passbooks to go from place to place in white areas.<ref>[http://overcomingapartheid.msu.edu/unit.php?id=5&page=2]</ref> Likewise, whites were ordered to relocate from the areas which they settled, that historically belonged to blacks.
 
    
 
    
Dr. Hendrik F Verwoerd, Prime Minister of South Africa from 1957 until 1966, designed a system that expanded the scope and impact of apartheid.  Blacks were given a increased education which guaranteed them many job opportunities as well as the opportunity to attend a university. 5 Black universities were created en financed by the white government during the 1960s.<ref>Da Gama, South Africa - key to a continent, Johannesburg, 1970</ref>.  The ''Reservation of Separate Amenities Act'', passed in 1953, ordered the segregation of blacks and whites at all public facilities, including post offices, public transportation, beaches, sports venues, parks, toilets, and even cemeteries. [http://overcomingapartheid.msu.edu/unit.php?id=5&page=2]  
+
Dr. [[Hendrik F. Verwoerd]], Prime Minister of South Africa from 1957 until 1966, designed a system that expanded the scope and impact of apartheid.  Blacks were given a limited education which guaranteed them menial job opportunities as opposed to Whites [http://www.stanford.edu/~jbaugh/saw/Chloe_Bantu_Education.html].  The ''Reservation of Separate Amenities Act'', passed in 1953, ordered the segregation of blacks at all public facilities, including post offices, public transportation, beaches, sports venues, parks, toilets, and even cemeteries.<ref>[http://overcomingapartheid.msu.edu/unit.php?id=5&page=2]</ref>
  
:''"There is no place for him [the African] in the European community above the level of certain forms of labor. Within his own community, however, all doors are open."'' Hendrik F. Verwoerd (1954) [http://overcomingapartheid.msu.edu/unit.php?id=5]
+
:''"There is no place for him [the African] in the European community above the level of certain forms of labor. Within his own community, however, all doors are open. For that reason it is to no avail for him to receive a training which has as its aim absorption in the European community, where he cannot be absorbed."'' Hendrik F. Verwoerd (1954) <ref>[http://overcomingapartheid.msu.edu/unit.php?id=5]</ref>
  
Verwoerd had also insisted, and succeeded in getting, limited self-administration in the black homelands of the Transkei, Ciskei, Bophuthatswana, Venda and KwaZulu, which meant they were semi-autonomous.  This had also meant that the homelands were now responsible for their own societal and economic problems; it also had the benefit for the white-controlled South African government that a huge majority of blacks in the country were no longer citizens, and therefore ineligible to vote, however, all blacks gained full voting rights in the bantustans. [http://www.suedafrika.net/history/eh_apart2.htm]
+
Verwoerd had also insisted and succeeded in getting limited self-administration in the black reservations (called "homelands") of the Transkei, Ciskei, Bophuthatswana, Venda, Ganzankulu, KwaNdebele, KwaZulu, [[Lebowa]], and QwaQwa, which meant they were semi-autonomous.  This had also meant that the homelands were now responsible for their own societal and economic problems. 'Africans' were denied citizenship and were instead granted full voting rights in several 'homelands' or bantustans.<ref>[http://www.suedafrika.net/history/eh_apart2.htm]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Independence of four Bantustans==
 +
Four of the Bantustans, Transkei (1976), Ciskei (1981), Bophuthatswana (1977), and Venda (1979), were eventually declared independent nations by South Africa, albeit without any international recognition other than from each other. 
 +
 
 +
During their period of independence, these four nations were often derided by critics claiming they were [[puppet government]]s of South Africa, but the Transkei government had a rocky relationship with South Africa, breaking diplomatic relations between 1978 and 1980 over territorial disputes, and then undergoing a military [[coup d'état]] in 1987 after which Transkei became an ally of, and safe haven for, the [[African National Congress]].
 +
 
 +
In Bophuthatswana on the other hand, an attempted coup in 1988 was suppressed by South Africa, who restored president Kgosi Lucas Manyane Mangope.  The Sun City [[casino]] was located in Bophuthatswana, where [[gambling]] was legal (it was illegal in South Africa).  Ciskei and Venda both underwent military coups in 1990, which South Africa did not suppress. 
 +
 
 +
All four countries were re-incorporated into South Africa in April 1994 following the end of Apartheid and the adoption of a new South African constitution, but Bophuthatswana and Ciskei at first declared their refusal to re-integrate and their intention to remain independent nations.  Both stand-offs ended after mutinies and coup d'états deposed their respective leaders within two weeks of each other in March 1994.
  
 
==1983 Whites-only referendum==
 
==1983 Whites-only referendum==
 
In 1983 President PW Botha put the question of allowing Colored and Indian representation to the White electorate. 66% of whites voted to allow Coloreds and Indians their own houses of parliament (called the House of Representatives and the House of Delegates respectively).
 
In 1983 President PW Botha put the question of allowing Colored and Indian representation to the White electorate. 66% of whites voted to allow Coloreds and Indians their own houses of parliament (called the House of Representatives and the House of Delegates respectively).
  
Although many ultra-nationalistic and conservative whites attacked the move as it was power-sharing (which they feared would result in Black rule, and indeed it did some 11 years later).
+
Although many ultra-nationalistic and conservative Whites attacked the move as it was power-sharing (which they feared would result in Black rule)
  
 
==The Troubles==
 
==The Troubles==
Line 21: Line 31:
  
 
Between 1986 and 1994 some 10,000 IFP members were murdered by ANC supporters, many in a brutal fashion, the practice of "necklacing" was very popular amongst ANC members. Necklacing entailed placing a petrol-filled tire around the neck of a victim and then setting it alight.
 
Between 1986 and 1994 some 10,000 IFP members were murdered by ANC supporters, many in a brutal fashion, the practice of "necklacing" was very popular amongst ANC members. Necklacing entailed placing a petrol-filled tire around the neck of a victim and then setting it alight.
 +
 +
Since the abolition of apartheid due to changes demanded by [[liberal]] outsiders South Africa has struggled as a society.
 +
 +
== Apartheid 2.0 ==
 +
The ANC created an apartheid 2.0 wich means white South Africans don't have the same rights as black South Africans. It results in an impoverished white population and mass murder of whites (the so-called ''plaasmoorden''). Western MSM doesn't report of this because of their anti-white political agenda.<ref>https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-22554709 A rare report in MSM (BBC)</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 26: Line 41:
  
 
==Sources==
 
==Sources==
*Apartheid: A History by Brian Lapping
+
*''Apartheid: A History'' by Brian Lapping
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Apartheid]]
 +
[[Category:South Africa]]

Latest revision as of 05:13, April 9, 2019

Apartheid is an affront to human rights and human dignity. Normal and friendly relations cannot exist between the United States and South Africa until it becomes a dead policy. Americans are of one mind and one heart on this issue. Ronald Reagan[1]

Apartheid (meaning separateness in Afrikaans), was a social, economic and political policy of racial segregation which was enforced by white minority governments in South Africa from 1948 until June 17, 1991 when the final Apartheid laws were abolished in Parliament. A form of apartheid still exists, however, this time against light-skinned people. A Black socialist majority has implemented race-based Nazi-style seizure laws against white people.

Verwoerd and the Bantustans

Laws passed in 1950 forced a separation of non-whites from whites in South African society. The first, the Population Registration Act, had people register with a racial classification board to determine "officially" if they belonged to one of four racial groups: White, African, or Coloured (the later split into Coloured and Indian). The second, the Group Areas Act, was the enforced relocation of non-whites into designated urban areas; to compel these people into the new "townships", which were in essence little more than shanty towns. The government ordered the bulldozing of once-vibrant mixed-race communities; the non-white inhabitants, especially the Africans, were ordered to carry passbooks to go from place to place in white areas.[2] Likewise, whites were ordered to relocate from the areas which they settled, that historically belonged to blacks.

Dr. Hendrik F. Verwoerd, Prime Minister of South Africa from 1957 until 1966, designed a system that expanded the scope and impact of apartheid. Blacks were given a limited education which guaranteed them menial job opportunities as opposed to Whites [5]. The Reservation of Separate Amenities Act, passed in 1953, ordered the segregation of blacks at all public facilities, including post offices, public transportation, beaches, sports venues, parks, toilets, and even cemeteries.[3]

"There is no place for him [the African] in the European community above the level of certain forms of labor. Within his own community, however, all doors are open. For that reason it is to no avail for him to receive a training which has as its aim absorption in the European community, where he cannot be absorbed." Hendrik F. Verwoerd (1954) [4]

Verwoerd had also insisted – and succeeded – in getting limited self-administration in the black reservations (called "homelands") of the Transkei, Ciskei, Bophuthatswana, Venda, Ganzankulu, KwaNdebele, KwaZulu, Lebowa, and QwaQwa, which meant they were semi-autonomous. This had also meant that the homelands were now responsible for their own societal and economic problems. 'Africans' were denied citizenship and were instead granted full voting rights in several 'homelands' or bantustans.[5]

Independence of four Bantustans

Four of the Bantustans, Transkei (1976), Ciskei (1981), Bophuthatswana (1977), and Venda (1979), were eventually declared independent nations by South Africa, albeit without any international recognition other than from each other.

During their period of independence, these four nations were often derided by critics claiming they were puppet governments of South Africa, but the Transkei government had a rocky relationship with South Africa, breaking diplomatic relations between 1978 and 1980 over territorial disputes, and then undergoing a military coup d'état in 1987 after which Transkei became an ally of, and safe haven for, the African National Congress.

In Bophuthatswana on the other hand, an attempted coup in 1988 was suppressed by South Africa, who restored president Kgosi Lucas Manyane Mangope. The Sun City casino was located in Bophuthatswana, where gambling was legal (it was illegal in South Africa). Ciskei and Venda both underwent military coups in 1990, which South Africa did not suppress.

All four countries were re-incorporated into South Africa in April 1994 following the end of Apartheid and the adoption of a new South African constitution, but Bophuthatswana and Ciskei at first declared their refusal to re-integrate and their intention to remain independent nations. Both stand-offs ended after mutinies and coup d'états deposed their respective leaders within two weeks of each other in March 1994.

1983 Whites-only referendum

In 1983 President PW Botha put the question of allowing Colored and Indian representation to the White electorate. 66% of whites voted to allow Coloreds and Indians their own houses of parliament (called the House of Representatives and the House of Delegates respectively).

Although many ultra-nationalistic and conservative Whites attacked the move as it was power-sharing (which they feared would result in Black rule)

The Troubles

The followers of Chief Mangosuthu Buthelezi (Zulu King) and his Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) were staunchly pro-separation and even entered into a short-lived non-aggression pact with the AWB in 1993.

However the African National Congress, who drew members from most other Black tribes, were pro-integration and, as such, Zulu workers who had migrated to White South Africa were frequently involved in clashes with ANC supporters in the townships (Black areas adjoining many White towns and cities).

Between 1986 and 1994 some 10,000 IFP members were murdered by ANC supporters, many in a brutal fashion, the practice of "necklacing" was very popular amongst ANC members. Necklacing entailed placing a petrol-filled tire around the neck of a victim and then setting it alight.

Since the abolition of apartheid due to changes demanded by liberal outsiders South Africa has struggled as a society.

Apartheid 2.0

The ANC created an apartheid 2.0 wich means white South Africans don't have the same rights as black South Africans. It results in an impoverished white population and mass murder of whites (the so-called plaasmoorden). Western MSM doesn't report of this because of their anti-white political agenda.[6]

References

Sources

  • Apartheid: A History by Brian Lapping