When even Creationist sites disagree...: *hack* *wheeze* Okay, here is a selection of my quality edits. Can we NOW... P-L-E-A-S-E... discuss the actual issue?
+3,456
When even Creationist sites disagree...: So far, you have called me a liberal, an evolutionist, a provocateur, and now my 150+ edits are low-quality?
+1,177
When even Creationist sites disagree...
+1,104
When even Creationist sites disagree...
+912
When even Creationist sites disagree...: Edit to add
+516
When even Creationist sites disagree...: Experts from both sides agree that Hoyle is wrong, but your "pro-evolution bias" comment made me chuckle at least.
+1,344
One less fact-tagged article
+330
Rewriting, restructuring, removing fact tag
Rewriting and restructuring. Also see notes on Talk in a few minutes.
+769
no edit summary
m+6
Opposition to Gay Rights: One less fact-tagged article.
+132
Inserting a headline above the initial remark so we get a ToC
m+13
When even Creationist sites disagree...
+824
Not the most pleasing image!
Where is the reference?: Very poor way of defending my faith
+1,547
Incorrect permalink.
m+87
Opinion, and this is the list of techniques used, not of arguments on how the content is wrong or something.
m-43
no edit summary
m+3
no edit summary
m+427
Tried to rephrase this so it doesn't look like something a Christian Evangelist said about an Atheist Evangelist. I agree with the points made, but the style...
+480
Welcome: Well, he had a point, in a way...
+312
Since I keep losing this link...
m+65
Logo request: Shifting image to the right side to enable indents
m+1
Logo request: ...that is many things, but not the logo I'm seeing.
+408
One less fact-tagged article
+139
Adding nowiki tags since this was not a call for sources.
m+17
Redirecting to Mitchell David Kapor
m-12
Redirecting to Electronic Frontier Foundation
m-4
Leonardo da Vinci homeschooled?
+646
Barebone wikilinking and bolding
m+45
Barebone wikilinking and bolding
m+22
Barebone wikilinking and bolding
m+44
Barebone wikilinking and bolding
m+21
So I told myself, "Hey, let's find some sources for Quechua - how hard can it be?"... I'll be more careful with such questions next time.
+474
Answering "fact" with an external link.
+101
"nowiki" tags for the "fact" calls since they weren't used to actually specify something that needs to be cited. This debate title also led to the category table having odd dimensions.
m+34
Criticisms: One less article tagged with "fact". Replaced somewhat vague paganism allegation with sourced criticism of how children may actively explore it.
+193
I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT)
+217
I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT): "nowiki" for the fact template itself to remove it from the "Articles with unsourced statements" category
m+51
Thanks, Ed!
+182
I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT)
+445
no edit summary
+551
Folks, there is an easy solution: Citations.
+12
Another example of Wikipedia silliness
+436
Formatting error in list leads to possibly unwanted inflation of count: I disagree because...
+480
Formatting error in list leads to possibly unwanted inflation of count
+3,264
Australian election results: Why would I vote the guys who screwed up?
+767
Books by foreign authors
+107