User talk:WilliamofOcham - Revision history

Ed Poor: tell me more

2007-12-20T02:28:08Z

tell me more

Philip J. Rayment: /* greeting to you too */ unsigned

2007-12-19T07:16:57Z

greeting to you too: unsigned

JFPerry: /* Philosophy articles */ typo correction in my last post

2007-12-18T16:10:11Z

Philosophy articles: typo correction in my last post

JFPerry: /* Philosophy articles */ philosophy article work

2007-12-18T16:09:19Z

Philosophy articles: philosophy article work

DrMaine: greeting to you too

2007-12-18T15:55:27Z

greeting to you too

Philip J. Rayment: Permission not required, as I understand it.

2007-12-17T23:14:50Z

Permission not required, as I understand it.

Philip J. Rayment: welcome

2007-12-17T23:10:35Z

welcome

JFPerry: Philosophy articles

2007-12-17T17:03:49Z

Philosophy articles

Karajou at 16:48, December 17, 2007

2007-12-17T16:48:24Z

Karajou at 16:13, December 17, 2007

2007-12-17T16:13:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, December 20, 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:
	hi, fellow traveller. i too was involved at wikipedia and found my faith challenged, even though i tried to stick to the medical articles where it seldom arises as problematic.		hi, fellow traveller. i too was involved at wikipedia and found my faith challenged, even though i tried to stick to the medical articles where it seldom arises as problematic.
	Goodluck with your writing endeavours. {{unsigned\|DrMaine}}		Goodluck with your writing endeavours. {{unsigned\|DrMaine}}
		+
		+	==Types of [[Old Earth Creationism]]==
		+
		+	I would dearly like to know more about the various flavors of OEC. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 21:28, 19 December 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, December 19, 2007
Line 33:		Line 33:

	hi, fellow traveller. i too was involved at wikipedia and found my faith challenged, even though i tried to stick to the medical articles where it seldom arises as problematic.		hi, fellow traveller. i too was involved at wikipedia and found my faith challenged, even though i tried to stick to the medical articles where it seldom arises as problematic.
−	Goodluck with your writing endeavours.	+	Goodluck with your writing endeavours. {{unsigned\|DrMaine}}

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 :Ah, so you read Latin! Ditto here, but its a bit rusty. The "Latin" article is on my list for re-working.
-:Eventually, Schlafly is going to need to set up some program where his horde of homeschollers can vet the articles to see if they are understandable at the 14-18 year age level. Meanwhile, I just try to recall what it was like in the long ago distant past when I was that age. ;-)
+:Eventually, Schlafly is going to need to set up some program where his horde of homeschoolers can vet the articles to see if they are understandable at the 14-18 year age level. Meanwhile, I just try to recall what it was like in the long ago distant past when I was that age. ;-)
 :Maybe I shouldn't skip over Plato. That is one reason for the "project" list of philosophy articles - perhaps better to divide up the work given the small number of folks right now so as to better cover the field. I will post a list of "high priority" philosophy articles sometime in the next few days and let you know where it is.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, December 18, 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:

	[[User:JFPerry\|JFPerry]] 12:03, 17 December 2007 (EST)		[[User:JFPerry\|JFPerry]] 12:03, 17 December 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	:Ah, so you read Latin! Ditto here, but its a bit rusty. The "Latin" article is on my list for re-working.
		+
		+	:Eventually, Schlafly is going to need to set up some program where his horde of homeschollers can vet the articles to see if they are understandable at the 14-18 year age level. Meanwhile, I just try to recall what it was like in the long ago distant past when I was that age. ;-)
		+
		+	:Maybe I shouldn't skip over Plato. That is one reason for the "project" list of philosophy articles - perhaps better to divide up the work given the small number of folks right now so as to better cover the field. I will post a list of "high priority" philosophy articles sometime in the next few days and let you know where it is.
		+
		+	:[[User:JFPerry\|JFPerry]] 11:09, 18 December 2007 (EST)

	== Welcome ==		== Welcome ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:55, December 18, 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I don't know why one of the other sysops or posters didn't already do this, but ...		I don't know why one of the other sysops or posters didn't already do this, but ...
	{{welcome\|sig=[[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:10, 17 December 2007 (EST)}}		{{welcome\|sig=[[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:10, 17 December 2007 (EST)}}
		+
		+	== greeting to you too ==
		+
		+	hi, fellow traveller. i too was involved at wikipedia and found my faith challenged, even though i tried to stick to the medical articles where it seldom arises as problematic.
		+	Goodluck with your writing endeavours.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, December 17, 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Editing the info for the image is the same as any article. As to what you wrote for Wikipedia and uploaded here, please be advised that such needs Achlafly's permission; he'll more than likely approve it anyway, but it's a matter of course here. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 11:48, 17 December 2007 (EST)		Editing the info for the image is the same as any article. As to what you wrote for Wikipedia and uploaded here, please be advised that such needs Achlafly's permission; he'll more than likely approve it anyway, but it's a matter of course here. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 11:48, 17 December 2007 (EST)
		+	:I've been under the impression (and have told others this) that no permission is required, as long as it ''is'' your own work, and not as modified by others. It also should have a notice (on the talk page) declaring you to be the author of the original (Wikipedia) article. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:14, 17 December 2007 (EST)

	== Philosophy articles ==		== Philosophy articles ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, December 17, 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:

	[[User:JFPerry\|JFPerry]] 12:03, 17 December 2007 (EST)		[[User:JFPerry\|JFPerry]] 12:03, 17 December 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	== Welcome ==
		+	I don't know why one of the other sysops or posters didn't already do this, but ...
		+	{{welcome\|sig=[[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:10, 17 December 2007 (EST)}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, December 17, 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Editing the info for the image is the same as any article. As to what you wrote for Wikipedia and uploaded here, please be advised that such needs Achlafly's permission; he'll more than likely approve it anyway, but it's a matter of course here. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 11:48, 17 December 2007 (EST)		Editing the info for the image is the same as any article. As to what you wrote for Wikipedia and uploaded here, please be advised that such needs Achlafly's permission; he'll more than likely approve it anyway, but it's a matter of course here. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 11:48, 17 December 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	== Philosophy articles ==
		+
		+	I see you are working on philosophy articles, as I am. I have started with the Pre-Socratics and, once I'm finished there, will go on to Aristotle (skipping over Plato). I am also developing a list of "high priority" philosophy articles. This list, which will be available soon, is designed to focus work on the most important such articles as well as to settle on naming conventions for same.
		+
		+	In all things, I try to keep in mind that Conservapedia is meant to be aimed at 14-18 year olds (see my comments on the "substance dualism" section of the "dualism" article).
		+
		+	[[User:JFPerry\|JFPerry]] 12:03, 17 December 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, December 17, 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The image that you requested uploaded to your user page needs an edit as to copyright status, author of the work, date of the work, and source. Can you provide that info? [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 11:13, 17 December 2007 (EST)		The image that you requested uploaded to your user page needs an edit as to copyright status, author of the work, date of the work, and source. Can you provide that info? [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 11:13, 17 December 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	Editing the info for the image is the same as any article. As to what you wrote for Wikipedia and uploaded here, please be advised that such needs Achlafly's permission; he'll more than likely approve it anyway, but it's a matter of course here. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 11:48, 17 December 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, December 17, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	Fill in the details about this image. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 13:58, 15 December 2007 (EST)		Fill in the details about this image. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 13:58, 15 December 2007 (EST)

Line 5:		Line 4:

	Please read [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] before getting too busy, and '''do communicate''' a lot with sysops, who have a measure of editorial authority here. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 21:34, 15 December 2007 (EST)		Please read [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] before getting too busy, and '''do communicate''' a lot with sysops, who have a measure of editorial authority here. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 21:34, 15 December 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	The image that you requested uploaded to your user page needs an edit as to copyright status, author of the work, date of the work, and source. Can you provide that info? [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 11:13, 17 December 2007 (EST)