User talk:MarkGall - Revision history

SamHB: /* pulsar, schmulsar; quasar, schmasar */ new section

2011-07-20T04:48:46Z

pulsar, schmulsar; quasar, schmasar: new section

RobSmith: /* Welcome back */

2011-07-19T22:47:16Z

Welcome back

MarkGall: /* Welcome back */ thanks!

2011-07-19T22:11:19Z

Welcome back: thanks!

RobSmith: Sorry for the incorrect information in the deletion log.

2011-07-19T20:04:53Z

Sorry for the incorrect information in the deletion log.

JohnFraiser: Undo revision 721924 by FredReynolds (Talk)

2009-11-19T20:55:03Z

Undo revision 721924 by FredReynolds (Talk)

Show changes

FredReynolds: Replaced content with 'Blessed are those that follow Stephen Colbert. Stephen loves us all; let thou follow his guiding light!'

2009-11-19T20:35:10Z

Replaced content with 'Blessed are those that follow Stephen Colbert. Stephen loves us all; let thou follow his guiding light!'

Show changes

EvanW: /* Why KSorenson left */ new section

2009-11-17T20:20:04Z

Why KSorenson left: new section

Jpatt: /* What gives? */ reply

2009-11-17T19:30:31Z

What gives?: reply

Aschlafly: /* What gives? */ This site will remain a beacon of free and productive thought and speech.

2009-11-17T19:09:21Z

What gives?: This site will remain a beacon of free and productive thought and speech.

JLauttamus: /* What gives? */

2009-11-17T18:59:18Z

What gives?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, July 20, 2011
Line 342:		Line 342:
	:Thanks for restoring my pages. I think my block was self-inflicted, so I'll take the blame for that one. --[[User:MarkGall\|MarkGall]] 18:11, 19 July 2011 (EDT)		:Thanks for restoring my pages. I think my block was self-inflicted, so I'll take the blame for that one. --[[User:MarkGall\|MarkGall]] 18:11, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
	::The block log tells the story, but the deletion log contains what may be considered an inappropriate personal remark from a user no longer with us. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 18:47, 19 July 2011 (EDT)		::The block log tells the story, but the deletion log contains what may be considered an inappropriate personal remark from a user no longer with us. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 18:47, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
		+
		+	== pulsar, schmulsar; quasar, schmasar ==
		+
		+	You're right. Ms. Bell heard the first "Little Green Men".
		+
		+	BTW, that "Women in STEM" page went off in a very interesting direction, quite different from its original vision.
		+
		+	Good to see you again!
		+
		+	[[User:SamHB\|SamHB]] 00:48, 20 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, July 19, 2011
Line 341:		Line 341:
	Sorry for the incorrect information in the deletion log [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=User_talk%3AMarkGall]. It appears you've been unblocked for sometime, [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AMarkGall] and may perhaps never should have been blocked in the first place. Our apologies, and welcome back. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 16:04, 19 July 2011 (EDT)		Sorry for the incorrect information in the deletion log [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=User_talk%3AMarkGall]. It appears you've been unblocked for sometime, [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AMarkGall] and may perhaps never should have been blocked in the first place. Our apologies, and welcome back. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 16:04, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
	:Thanks for restoring my pages. I think my block was self-inflicted, so I'll take the blame for that one. --[[User:MarkGall\|MarkGall]] 18:11, 19 July 2011 (EDT)		:Thanks for restoring my pages. I think my block was self-inflicted, so I'll take the blame for that one. --[[User:MarkGall\|MarkGall]] 18:11, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
		+	::The block log tells the story, but the deletion log contains what may be considered an inappropriate personal remark from a user no longer with us. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 18:47, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, July 19, 2011
Line 340:		Line 340:
	==Welcome back==		==Welcome back==
	Sorry for the incorrect information in the deletion log [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=User_talk%3AMarkGall]. It appears you've been unblocked for sometime, [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AMarkGall] and may perhaps never should have been blocked in the first place. Our apologies, and welcome back. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 16:04, 19 July 2011 (EDT)		Sorry for the incorrect information in the deletion log [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=User_talk%3AMarkGall]. It appears you've been unblocked for sometime, [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AMarkGall] and may perhaps never should have been blocked in the first place. Our apologies, and welcome back. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 16:04, 19 July 2011 (EDT)
		+	:Thanks for restoring my pages. I think my block was self-inflicted, so I'll take the blame for that one. --[[User:MarkGall\|MarkGall]] 18:11, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, July 19, 2011
Line 337:		Line 337:
	{{quotebox\|I can't in good conscience associate with a site that characterizes ''<nowiki>[[what he said]]</nowiki>'' as 'criticisms of homosexuality.'" And then I said that I can't continue to contribute and respect myself at the same time.}}		{{quotebox\|I can't in good conscience associate with a site that characterizes ''<nowiki>[[what he said]]</nowiki>'' as 'criticisms of homosexuality.'" And then I said that I can't continue to contribute and respect myself at the same time.}}
	I wish she hadn't departed. She was definitely a boon to our science pages; I only hope [[User:PatrickD\|other editors]] can bring up the slack. Fortunately, [[User:BringBackKate]] was wrong about why she left. --[[User:EvanW\|EvanW]] 15:20, 17 November 2009 (EST)		I wish she hadn't departed. She was definitely a boon to our science pages; I only hope [[User:PatrickD\|other editors]] can bring up the slack. Fortunately, [[User:BringBackKate]] was wrong about why she left. --[[User:EvanW\|EvanW]] 15:20, 17 November 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	==Welcome back==
		+	Sorry for the incorrect information in the deletion log [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=User_talk%3AMarkGall]. It appears you've been unblocked for sometime, [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AMarkGall] and may perhaps never should have been blocked in the first place. Our apologies, and welcome back. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 16:04, 19 July 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, November 17, 2009
Line 329:		Line 329:

	Hi Mark, I blocked Ksorenson. She retired and left a snotty parody using Larry Johnson's the fag comment routine. I just moved her along for good. It would be nice if science and math were not politicized but liberals have their paws all over education, they are the culprit, the cause, we are the effect. --[[User:Jpatt\|Jpatt]] 14:30, 17 November 2009 (EST)		Hi Mark, I blocked Ksorenson. She retired and left a snotty parody using Larry Johnson's the fag comment routine. I just moved her along for good. It would be nice if science and math were not politicized but liberals have their paws all over education, they are the culprit, the cause, we are the effect. --[[User:Jpatt\|Jpatt]] 14:30, 17 November 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	== Why KSorenson left ==
		+
		+	Mark,
		+
		+	I too was quite disturbed when I saw KSorenson had left and been blocked. However, I discovered on our local liberal vandals' website (I'm sure you know the URL), which had seen her user page before it was deleted, that she left not over "ideological" challenges without "any scientific basis", but over the Larry Johnson news item appearing on the main page.
		+	{{quotebox\|I can't in good conscience associate with a site that characterizes ''<nowiki>[[what he said]]</nowiki>'' as 'criticisms of homosexuality.'" And then I said that I can't continue to contribute and respect myself at the same time.}}
		+	I wish she hadn't departed. She was definitely a boon to our science pages; I only hope [[User:PatrickD\|other editors]] can bring up the slack. Fortunately, [[User:BringBackKate]] was wrong about why she left. --[[User:EvanW\|EvanW]] 15:20, 17 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, November 17, 2009
Line 327:		Line 327:

	::Free speech -- and free thought -- are disappearing my friends. But not on this site. This site will remain a beacon of free and productive thought and speech.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 14:09, 17 November 2009 (EST)		::Free speech -- and free thought -- are disappearing my friends. But not on this site. This site will remain a beacon of free and productive thought and speech.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 14:09, 17 November 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	Hi Mark, I blocked Ksorenson. She retired and left a snotty parody using Larry Johnson's the fag comment routine. I just moved her along for good. It would be nice if science and math were not politicized but liberals have their paws all over education, they are the culprit, the cause, we are the effect. --[[User:Jpatt\|Jpatt]] 14:30, 17 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, November 17, 2009
Line 317:		Line 317:
	You've proven yourself a valuable contributor to the articles, debates, and projects on this site, but all of a sudden you disagree with the whole Conservapedia project and end contribution fullstop? What gives, Mark? [[User:DouglasA\|DouglasA]] 13:57, 17 November 2009 (EST)		You've proven yourself a valuable contributor to the articles, debates, and projects on this site, but all of a sudden you disagree with the whole Conservapedia project and end contribution fullstop? What gives, Mark? [[User:DouglasA\|DouglasA]] 13:57, 17 November 2009 (EST)
	:With Douglas on this one. Take some time and really think about this, Mark. You're clearly a very valued, knowledgeable editor. I would hate to see you go. -- [[User:JLauttamus\|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus\|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:59, 17 November 2009 (EST)		:With Douglas on this one. Take some time and really think about this, Mark. You're clearly a very valued, knowledgeable editor. I would hate to see you go. -- [[User:JLauttamus\|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus\|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:59, 17 November 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	::Mark, we'll miss you if you don't reconsider. Hope you can return.
		+
		+	::This comes on the heels of:
		+
		+	::*a discussion of data contrary to relativity
		+	::*the news of retaliation against the Kansas City Chiefs football star for comments he made on the internet
		+	::*several liberals saying it's just fine to retaliate against people for what they say, on their own time, on the internet.
		+
		+	::Free speech -- and free thought -- are disappearing my friends. But not on this site. This site will remain a beacon of free and productive thought and speech.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 14:09, 17 November 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, November 17, 2009
Line 316:		Line 316:

	You've proven yourself a valuable contributor to the articles, debates, and projects on this site, but all of a sudden you disagree with the whole Conservapedia project and end contribution fullstop? What gives, Mark? [[User:DouglasA\|DouglasA]] 13:57, 17 November 2009 (EST)		You've proven yourself a valuable contributor to the articles, debates, and projects on this site, but all of a sudden you disagree with the whole Conservapedia project and end contribution fullstop? What gives, Mark? [[User:DouglasA\|DouglasA]] 13:57, 17 November 2009 (EST)
		+	:With Douglas on this one. Take some time and really think about this, Mark. You're clearly a very valued, knowledgeable editor. I would hate to see you go. -- [[User:JLauttamus\|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus\|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:59, 17 November 2009 (EST)