User talk:GregG - Revision history

RobSmith: /* More "Bad news for Conservapedia's evolutionists" from User:Conservative */ de-spam

2024-01-25T00:43:13Z

More "Bad news for Conservapedia's evolutionists" from User:Conservative: de-spam

DavidB4: Undo revision 1207680 by NewIdentity (talk)trolling vandal

2016-04-06T22:46:13Z

Undo revision 1207680 by NewIdentity (talk)trolling vandal

NewIdentity: /* WELCOME! */ new section

2016-04-06T22:37:41Z

WELCOME!: new section

GregG: /* Great to see you again! */ re

2016-01-06T01:20:10Z

Great to see you again!: re

Aschlafly: happy New Year!

2016-01-06T00:30:19Z

happy New Year!

Conservative: /* More bad news for Kenneth Miller fans */

2015-10-14T21:01:16Z

More bad news for Kenneth Miller fans

Can't load revision 1175762

at 22:53, October 13, 2015

2015-10-13T22:53:55Z

Can't load revision 1175649

at 22:30, October 13, 2015

2015-10-13T22:30:24Z

Can't load revision 1175644

at 21:55, October 13, 2015

2015-10-13T21:55:16Z

Can't load revision 1175630

Conservative: /* Clickbait */

2015-09-26T16:56:25Z

Clickbait

@@ Line 163: / Line 163: @@
 [[User:GregG|GregG]] 01:17, 19 May 2013 (EDT)
-== More "Bad news for Conservapedia's evolutionists" from [[User:Conservative]] ==
+== More "Bad news for Conservapedia's evolutionists" from <nowiki>[[User:Conservative]] ==
 (content created by [[User:Conservative]] and subject to Conservapedia's copyright policy)
 <div style="margin: 10px; padding: 10px; background-color: #CCC">
-[[File:Sun Tzu portrait.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|"And therefore those skilled in war bring the enemy to the field of battle and are not brought there by him." - [[Sun Tzu]] ]]
+[[File:Sun Tzu portrait.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|"And therefore those skilled in war bring the enemy to the field of battle and are not brought there by him." - [[Sun Tzu]]</nowiki> ]]
 A message to Conservapedia's evolutionists re: me/us not reading talk pages or posting to talk pages until [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#Public_notice_from_User:_Conservative_account at least 2016]:

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, April 6, 2016
Line 340:		Line 340:
	Nothing better than seeing an old friend again! It's great to see you, Greg. Happy New Year!--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly\|talk]]) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (EST)		Nothing better than seeing an old friend again! It's great to see you, Greg. Happy New Year!--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly\|talk]]) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (EST)
	:Thanks, I really appreciate it! I had a great Christmas, but in about a week or so, I will again be inactive pursuing real-life opportunities. [[User:GregG\|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG\|talk]]) 20:20, 5 January 2016 (EST)		:Thanks, I really appreciate it! I had a great Christmas, but in about a week or so, I will again be inactive pursuing real-life opportunities. [[User:GregG\|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG\|talk]]) 20:20, 5 January 2016 (EST)
−
−	~~== WELCOME! ==~~
−
−	~~This shitty wiki is full of liberal trolls run by a moronic nutjob!~~
−	~~Welcome!~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, April 6, 2016
Line 340:		Line 340:
	Nothing better than seeing an old friend again! It's great to see you, Greg. Happy New Year!--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly\|talk]]) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (EST)		Nothing better than seeing an old friend again! It's great to see you, Greg. Happy New Year!--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly\|talk]]) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (EST)
	:Thanks, I really appreciate it! I had a great Christmas, but in about a week or so, I will again be inactive pursuing real-life opportunities. [[User:GregG\|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG\|talk]]) 20:20, 5 January 2016 (EST)		:Thanks, I really appreciate it! I had a great Christmas, but in about a week or so, I will again be inactive pursuing real-life opportunities. [[User:GregG\|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG\|talk]]) 20:20, 5 January 2016 (EST)
		+
		+	== WELCOME! ==
		+
		+	This shitty wiki is full of liberal trolls run by a moronic nutjob!
		+	Welcome!

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, January 6, 2016
Line 339:		Line 339:

	Nothing better than seeing an old friend again! It's great to see you, Greg. Happy New Year!--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly\|talk]]) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (EST)		Nothing better than seeing an old friend again! It's great to see you, Greg. Happy New Year!--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly\|talk]]) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (EST)
		+	:Thanks, I really appreciate it! I had a great Christmas, but in about a week or so, I will again be inactive pursuing real-life opportunities. [[User:GregG\|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG\|talk]]) 20:20, 5 January 2016 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, January 6, 2016
Line 335:		Line 335:

	By the way, has Miller gotten back to you about the [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/04/an_icon_of_the_071421.html 15 questions] for evolutionists yet? [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 17:55, 13 October 2015 (EDT)		By the way, has Miller gotten back to you about the [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/04/an_icon_of_the_071421.html 15 questions] for evolutionists yet? [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 17:55, 13 October 2015 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Great to see you again! ==
		+
		+	Nothing better than seeing an old friend again! It's great to see you, Greg. Happy New Year!--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly\|talk]]) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (EST)

@@ Line 325: / Line 325: @@
 Why did you use a Conservapedia headline as an example in the page you originated, "[[Clickbait]]"?  Is that what you think the Main Page right section is?  Clickbait?  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 00:26, 26 September 2015 (EDT)
 :My opinion is that many of the teapartycrusaders.com headlines (linked to on MPR) are clickbait (which is unfortunate, since I think honest headlines are much better).  The other headlines are usually high quality.  I don't think clickbait TPC headlines should be so prevalent on our main page, but one particular administrator apparently thinks otherwise.  And since my previous attempts to improve MPR have been unsuccessful, I don't bother with that approach anymore.  Thanks, [[User:GregG|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG|talk]]) 10:10, 26 September 2015 (EDT)
-::The title was: "When CNN Said 'It's Ok To Abort Babies', Ben Carson's Reply Left The Whole Room Silent".  It may or may not have been a misleading title. Was there an audience for the CNN interview? Probably not, but it is unclear. Given the brevity of the clip and the camera angle, I don't know if there was an audience (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence). I think you need a more definitive example of clickbait. I deleted your second example. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:30, 26 September 2015 (EDT)
+::The title was: "When CNN Said 'It's Ok To Abort Babies', Ben Carson's Reply Left The Whole Room Silent".  It may or may not have been a misleading title. Was there an audience for the CNN interview? Probably not, but it is unclear. Given the brevity of the clip and the camera angle, I don't know if there was an audience or not (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence). I think you need a more definitive example of clickbait. I deleted your second example. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:30, 26 September 2015 (EDT)
 :::I accidentally deleted the whole article. I restored the article with some changes. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:48, 26 September 2015 (EDT)