User talk:Elkman - Revision history

Philip J. Rayment: /* Thanks */ Done.

2008-06-17T14:04:52Z

Thanks: Done.

Elkman: /* Thanks */ Fine. Do it.

2008-06-17T13:26:56Z

Thanks: Fine. Do it.

Philip J. Rayment: /* Thanks */ new section

2008-06-17T12:10:06Z

Thanks: new section

AdenJ at 04:11, June 16, 2008

2008-06-16T04:11:17Z

TheGuy: Reply

2008-02-16T00:30:16Z

Elkman: I thought this was a conservative encyclopedia

2008-02-16T00:10:00Z

I thought this was a conservative encyclopedia

TheGuy: Explain

2008-02-16T00:03:59Z

Explain

Philip J. Rayment: welcome

2008-01-01T15:05:35Z

welcome

New page

{{welcome|sig=[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:05, 1 January 2008 (EST)}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, June 17, 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Thanks for the tip about protecting deleted pages. And If you want to be permanently blocked, please ask rather than provoke. We don't need an excuse to block! [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 17 June 2008 (EDT)		Thanks for the tip about protecting deleted pages. And If you want to be permanently blocked, please ask rather than provoke. We don't need an excuse to block! [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
	: Fine. Do it. --[[User:Elkman\|Elkman]] 09:26, 17 June 2008 (EDT)		: Fine. Do it. --[[User:Elkman\|Elkman]] 09:26, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
		+	:: Done. You know what to do if you change your mind (and assuming your e-mail is active). [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:04, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, June 17, 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Thanks for the tip about protecting deleted pages. And If you want to be permanently blocked, please ask rather than provoke. We don't need an excuse to block! [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 17 June 2008 (EDT)		Thanks for the tip about protecting deleted pages. And If you want to be permanently blocked, please ask rather than provoke. We don't need an excuse to block! [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
		+	: Fine. Do it. --[[User:Elkman\|Elkman]] 09:26, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, June 17, 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Sorry, you have me all wrong. By all means add the info you did but it didnt belong in that particular area. What is written is a run down of the bands of the era, not what they were up to. See what i mean?		Sorry, you have me all wrong. By all means add the info you did but it didnt belong in that particular area. What is written is a run down of the bands of the era, not what they were up to. See what i mean?
	[[User:AdenJ\|AdenJ]] 00:11, 16 June 2008 (EDT)		[[User:AdenJ\|AdenJ]] 00:11, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Thanks ==
		+
		+	Thanks for the tip about protecting deleted pages. And If you want to be permanently blocked, please ask rather than provoke. We don't need an excuse to block! [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:11, June 16, 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: This is a conservative encyclopedia. As such, character flaws and moral failings need to be pointed out as such. See [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]] items #8 and #13. --[[User:Elkman\|Elkman]] 19:10, 15 February 2008 (EST)		: This is a conservative encyclopedia. As such, character flaws and moral failings need to be pointed out as such. See [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]] items #8 and #13. --[[User:Elkman\|Elkman]] 19:10, 15 February 2008 (EST)
	::Yes, but making highly controversial statements that fly in the face of scientific research by relying on legislation imposed by politicians many years ago and opinion polls is akin to gossip and original research, neither of which are acceptable in any encyclopedia. If you have any proof that depression and alcoholism are moral weaknesses instead of mental illnesses, or if you have any proof that criminals cannot be rehabilitated then please present it, otherwise that bear in mine that even though Conservapedia is a "conservative encyclopedia", it is also a "trustworthy encyclopedia". [[User:TheGuy\|TheGuy]] 19:30, 15 February 2008 (EST)		::Yes, but making highly controversial statements that fly in the face of scientific research by relying on legislation imposed by politicians many years ago and opinion polls is akin to gossip and original research, neither of which are acceptable in any encyclopedia. If you have any proof that depression and alcoholism are moral weaknesses instead of mental illnesses, or if you have any proof that criminals cannot be rehabilitated then please present it, otherwise that bear in mine that even though Conservapedia is a "conservative encyclopedia", it is also a "trustworthy encyclopedia". [[User:TheGuy\|TheGuy]] 19:30, 15 February 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	==Sixties==
		+	Sorry, you have me all wrong. By all means add the info you did but it didnt belong in that particular area. What is written is a run down of the bands of the era, not what they were up to. See what i mean?
		+	[[User:AdenJ\|AdenJ]] 00:11, 16 June 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, February 16, 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I've reverted a number of your edits, as I perceived them as being highly suspicious. The most notable one involved citing state laws and a common saying rather than scientific fact to present the view that criminals cannot be rehabilitated. Please feel free to discuss these further. [[User:TheGuy\|TheGuy]] 19:03, 15 February 2008 (EST)		I've reverted a number of your edits, as I perceived them as being highly suspicious. The most notable one involved citing state laws and a common saying rather than scientific fact to present the view that criminals cannot be rehabilitated. Please feel free to discuss these further. [[User:TheGuy\|TheGuy]] 19:03, 15 February 2008 (EST)
	: This is a conservative encyclopedia. As such, character flaws and moral failings need to be pointed out as such. See [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]] items #8 and #13. --[[User:Elkman\|Elkman]] 19:10, 15 February 2008 (EST)		: This is a conservative encyclopedia. As such, character flaws and moral failings need to be pointed out as such. See [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]] items #8 and #13. --[[User:Elkman\|Elkman]] 19:10, 15 February 2008 (EST)
		+	::Yes, but making highly controversial statements that fly in the face of scientific research by relying on legislation imposed by politicians many years ago and opinion polls is akin to gossip and original research, neither of which are acceptable in any encyclopedia. If you have any proof that depression and alcoholism are moral weaknesses instead of mental illnesses, or if you have any proof that criminals cannot be rehabilitated then please present it, otherwise that bear in mine that even though Conservapedia is a "conservative encyclopedia", it is also a "trustworthy encyclopedia". [[User:TheGuy\|TheGuy]] 19:30, 15 February 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, February 16, 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I've reverted a number of your edits, as I perceived them as being highly suspicious. The most notable one involved citing state laws and a common saying rather than scientific fact to present the view that criminals cannot be rehabilitated. Please feel free to discuss these further. [[User:TheGuy\|TheGuy]] 19:03, 15 February 2008 (EST)		I've reverted a number of your edits, as I perceived them as being highly suspicious. The most notable one involved citing state laws and a common saying rather than scientific fact to present the view that criminals cannot be rehabilitated. Please feel free to discuss these further. [[User:TheGuy\|TheGuy]] 19:03, 15 February 2008 (EST)
		+	: This is a conservative encyclopedia. As such, character flaws and moral failings need to be pointed out as such. See [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]] items #8 and #13. --[[User:Elkman\|Elkman]] 19:10, 15 February 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, February 16, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{welcome\|sig=[[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:05, 1 January 2008 (EST)}}		{{welcome\|sig=[[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:05, 1 January 2008 (EST)}}
		+
		+	==Reversions==
		+
		+	I've reverted a number of your edits, as I perceived them as being highly suspicious. The most notable one involved citing state laws and a common saying rather than scientific fact to present the view that criminals cannot be rehabilitated. Please feel free to discuss these further. [[User:TheGuy\|TheGuy]] 19:03, 15 February 2008 (EST)