User talk:BryonRichards - Revision history

BryonRichards: /* Reversion */

2008-04-22T03:39:05Z

Reversion

2008-04-22T03:37:38Z

reverting vandals

2008-04-21T23:01:44Z

2008-04-20T20:08:47Z

William Jennings Bryan

2008-04-18T11:42:41Z

welcome and thanks

2008-04-17T04:52:21Z

New page: {{welcome}} ~~~~

New page

{{welcome}} [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:52, 17 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:39, April 22, 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	BryonRichards, thanks much for your reverting vandalism. However, I think you can do it more easily by clicking a "revert" option rather than editing the entry. You might look in the page history or on a "diff" and see if there is a "revert" link for automatically reverting all the vandal's edits. Thanks again.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 23:37, 21 April 2008 (EDT)		BryonRichards, thanks much for your reverting vandalism. However, I think you can do it more easily by clicking a "revert" option rather than editing the entry. You might look in the page history or on a "diff" and see if there is a "revert" link for automatically reverting all the vandal's edits. Thanks again.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 23:37, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I don't seem to have that option, Aschlafly. Is it a sysop only option? [[User:BryonRichards\|BryonRichards]] 23:39, 21 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, April 22, 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:I'm not sure if you meant by your edit summary that he would vote Republican because he was an evangelical, but about 35% of evangelicals voted for Bill Clinton. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week734/interview.html [[User:FernoKlump\|FernoKlump]] 19:01, 21 April 2008 (EDT)		:I'm not sure if you meant by your edit summary that he would vote Republican because he was an evangelical, but about 35% of evangelicals voted for Bill Clinton. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week734/interview.html [[User:FernoKlump\|FernoKlump]] 19:01, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Reversion ==
		+
		+	BryonRichards, thanks much for your reverting vandalism. However, I think you can do it more easily by clicking a "revert" option rather than editing the entry. You might look in the page history or on a "diff" and see if there is a "revert" link for automatically reverting all the vandal's edits. Thanks again.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 23:37, 21 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, April 21, 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	While I agree that it is likely that he would not support the Democratic party today, there is no way to actually know this. I don't think that an encyclopedia should contain speculation of how a historical figure would align politically today. [[User:FernoKlump\|FernoKlump]] 16:08, 20 April 2008 (EDT)		While I agree that it is likely that he would not support the Democratic party today, there is no way to actually know this. I don't think that an encyclopedia should contain speculation of how a historical figure would align politically today. [[User:FernoKlump\|FernoKlump]] 16:08, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I'm not sure if you meant by your edit summary that he would vote Republican because he was an evangelical, but about 35% of evangelicals voted for Bill Clinton. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week734/interview.html [[User:FernoKlump\|FernoKlump]] 19:01, 21 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, April 20, 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Nice phrasing on [[Statue]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Statue&diff=prev&oldid=432996 "figure carved from a rigid material"]. I look forward to reading a lot more of your contributions. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 07:42, 18 April 2008 (EDT)		Nice phrasing on [[Statue]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Statue&diff=prev&oldid=432996 "figure carved from a rigid material"]. I look forward to reading a lot more of your contributions. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 07:42, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	==William Jennings Bryan==
		+
		+	While I agree that it is likely that he would not support the Democratic party today, there is no way to actually know this. I don't think that an encyclopedia should contain speculation of how a historical figure would align politically today. [[User:FernoKlump\|FernoKlump]] 16:08, 20 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, April 18, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{welcome}} [[User:DanH\|DanH]] 00:52, 17 April 2008 (EDT)		{{welcome}} [[User:DanH\|DanH]] 00:52, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	Nice phrasing on [[Statue]]: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Statue&diff=prev&oldid=432996 "figure carved from a rigid material"]. I look forward to reading a lot more of your contributions. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 07:42, 18 April 2008 (EDT)