User:Nihiltres - Revision history

Nihiltres: Minor cleanup

2009-11-04T18:31:06Z

Minor cleanup

Nihiltres: clarification

2007-09-15T03:13:47Z

clarification

Nihiltres: announcing who I am.

2007-09-15T02:46:30Z

announcing who I am.

New page

Hi. I'm a Wikipedian and administrator there, a liberal, and a somewhat agnostic person whose spirituality falls under the vague wording of "buddhist-leaning transcendental pluralist", which if you can't figure out, means that I more or less think everybody's ok in what they believe. Yeah, here I might as well be the Antichrist, but if Conservapedia has any sense, they'll realize that I'm not out to vandalize or anything - this account is just to ask rational questions about valid issues, including potential copyright (GFDL) violations on Conservapedia (of Wikipedia). I do not condone the attacks against Wikipedia that are presented at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]] and other places, but I'd like to be reasonable and merely comment, not criticize. I know that this account will violate the 90/10 rule, but I hope that you, Conservapedia administrators, can be reasonable and not block it for that reason alone - all I want is to comment, and I'm announcing any bias I have. Regardless of Conservapedia's copyright, I consider my contributions to Conservapedia to be multi-licensed into the public domain if at all possible.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, November 4, 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Hi. I'm a Wikipedian and administrator there, a liberal, and a somewhat agnostic person ~~whose spirituality falls under the vague wording of "buddhist-leaning transcendental pluralist", which if you can't figure out, means that I more or less think everybody's ok in what they believe~~. ~~Yeah, here I might as well be the Antichrist, but if Conservapedia has any sense, they'll realize that I'm not out to vandalize or anything - this~~ account is just to ask rational questions about valid issues, including potential copyright (GFDL) violations on Conservapedia (of Wikipedia). I do not condone the attacks against Wikipedia that are presented at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]] and other places, but I'd like to be reasonable and merely comment, not criticize. I know that this account will violate the 90/10 rule, but I hope that you, Conservapedia administrators, can be reasonable and not block it for that reason alone - all I want is to comment, and I'm announcing any bias I have. I would make "quality edits", but all of the pages I would edit are protected. Regardless of Conservapedia's copyright, I consider my ~~contributions to~~ Conservapedia to be multi-licensed into the public domain ~~if at all possible~~.	+	Hi. I'm a Wikipedian and administrator there, a "liberal", and a somewhat agnostic person. This account is just to ask rational questions about valid issues, including potential copyright (GFDL/CC-BY-SA) violations on Conservapedia (of Wikipedia).
		+
		+	Regardless of Conservapedia's copyright scheme, I consider my edits on Conservapedia to be multi-licensed into the public domain.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, September 15, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Hi. I'm a Wikipedian and administrator there, a liberal, and a somewhat agnostic person whose spirituality falls under the vague wording of "buddhist-leaning transcendental pluralist", which if you can't figure out, means that I more or less think everybody's ok in what they believe. Yeah, here I might as well be the Antichrist, but if Conservapedia has any sense, they'll realize that I'm not out to vandalize or anything - this account is just to ask rational questions about valid issues, including potential copyright (GFDL) violations on Conservapedia (of Wikipedia). I do not condone the attacks against Wikipedia that are presented at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]] and other places, but I'd like to be reasonable and merely comment, not criticize. I know that this account will violate the 90/10 rule, but I hope that you, Conservapedia administrators, can be reasonable and not block it for that reason alone - all I want is to comment, and I'm announcing any bias I have. Regardless of Conservapedia's copyright, I consider my contributions to Conservapedia to be multi-licensed into the public domain if at all possible.	+	Hi. I'm a Wikipedian and administrator there, a liberal, and a somewhat agnostic person whose spirituality falls under the vague wording of "buddhist-leaning transcendental pluralist", which if you can't figure out, means that I more or less think everybody's ok in what they believe. Yeah, here I might as well be the Antichrist, but if Conservapedia has any sense, they'll realize that I'm not out to vandalize or anything - this account is just to ask rational questions about valid issues, including potential copyright (GFDL) violations on Conservapedia (of Wikipedia). I do not condone the attacks against Wikipedia that are presented at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]] and other places, but I'd like to be reasonable and merely comment, not criticize. I know that this account will violate the 90/10 rule, but I hope that you, Conservapedia administrators, can be reasonable and not block it for that reason alone - all I want is to comment, and I'm announcing any bias I have. I would make "quality edits", but all of the pages I would edit are protected. Regardless of Conservapedia's copyright, I consider my contributions to Conservapedia to be multi-licensed into the public domain if at all possible.