User:Mo Flint - Revision history

Mo Flint: /* What I think Notability is */

2007-05-04T21:03:14Z

What I think Notability is

Mo Flint: Started my userpage

2007-05-04T20:58:49Z

Started my userpage

New page

Hi, Mo Flint here. How did I find my way to Conservapedia from Wikipedia? Simple: I got sick of administrator abuse, stupid policies, arbitrary judgement, double standards, limited information, deletion of reliable, decent articles that some could find useful, and the horrible, arrogant, and unfriendly community.

I hope that sums it up. I really used to like Wikipedia, until I realized that the majority of the people there did not stand for anything I did. I hope that I can coexist in a community here where we can build an encyclopedia with more extensive information, and a reliable, friendly community that's willing to work together and not fight and try to destroy each other's hard work over abstract matters of "notability"

== What I think Notability is ==

I can understand it when articles like, "Bob Citizen plays golf on Sundays, and eats dinner with his wife" are disputed. I cannot understand why accurate articles, although written about someone less significant, are deleted when there is perhaps a minority of people that are interested in gaining more knowlege on the subject. I want people to be able to search for a figure on Conservapedia, and expect it to come up. Not see a "This article has been deleted, and protected from recreation" notice. That's all for now.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, May 4, 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== What I think Notability is ==		== What I think Notability is ==

−	I can understand it when articles like, "Bob Citizen plays golf on Sundays, and eats dinner with his wife" are disputed. I cannot understand why accurate articles, although written about someone less significant, are deleted when there is perhaps a minority of people that are interested in gaining more knowlege on the subject. I want people to be able to search for a figure on Conservapedia, and expect it to come up. Not see a "This article has been deleted, and protected from recreation" notice. That's all for now.	+	I can understand it when articles like, "Bob Citizen plays golf on Sundays, and eats dinner with his wife" are disputed. I cannot understand why accurate articles, although written about someone less significant, are deleted when there is perhaps a minority of people that are interested in gaining more knowlege on the subject. As long as the topic is well known enough that people can collaborate and build upon it, then I think it should be able to exist. I want people to be able to search for a figure on Conservapedia, and expect it to come up. Not see a "This article has been deleted, and protected from recreation" notice. That's all for now.