User:FAckles - Revision history

FAckles: /* Issues: */

2009-02-19T00:36:17Z

Issues:

FAckles: /* Focus: */ grammar

2009-02-19T00:31:11Z

Focus:: grammar

FAckles: /* Issues: */

2009-02-19T00:30:03Z

Issues:

FAckles: Issue with BHO's article

2009-02-19T00:29:07Z

Issue with BHO's article

FAckles: about

2009-02-18T23:51:39Z

about

New page

First impressions:
* Interesting site with some very interesting people
* Could be much improved in terms of bias - though what wiki wouldn't be?

Focus:
* Sports!
* Eliminate dishonest bias while recognizing and preserving the Conservative viewpoint of this encyclopedia

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 However, with that said, does everything in the Obama article reflect what a Christian should think, let alone, publish in an encyclopedia?
-While I know it's a tad corny, how I try to go about things is to think: What would Jesus do? It's overused, but it works.  '''When you read the [[Barack Obama]] article and see all the things it portrays, the ideas that are highlighted, the ones that are omitted, etc -- ''what do you think Jesus thinks of it?'''''
+While I know it's a tad corny, how I try to go about things is to think: What would Jesus do? It's overused (in popular culture without true thought), but it works.  '''When you read the [[Barack Obama]] article and see all the things it portrays, the ideas that are highlighted, the ones that are omitted, etc -- ''what do you think Jesus thinks of it?'''''
 I know my answer and I hope the admins on this site share it and can do something to change that.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 * Sports!
 * Eliminate dishonest bias while recognizing and preserving the Conservative viewpoint of this encyclopedia
-* Along the lines of the point above, making sure that Christian values supercedes pressures to uplift Conservatism when the two (though uncommonly so) are at odds with one another. Eg. see below
+* Along the lines of the point above, making sure that Christian values supercede pressures to uplift Conservatism when the two (though uncommonly so) are at odds with one another. Eg. see below
 ==Issues:==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 However, with that said, does everything in the Obama article reflect what a Christian should think, let alone, publish in an encyclopedia?
-While I know it's a tad corny, how I try to go about things is to think: What would Jesus do? It's overused, but it works.  '''When you read the [[Barack Obama]] article and see all the things it portrays, the ideas that are highlighted, the ones that are omitted, etc -- [[what do you think Jesus thinks of it?]]'''
+While I know it's a tad corny, how I try to go about things is to think: What would Jesus do? It's overused, but it works.  '''When you read the [[Barack Obama]] article and see all the things it portrays, the ideas that are highlighted, the ones that are omitted, etc -- ''what do you think Jesus thinks of it?'''''
 I know my answer and I hope the admins on this site share it and can do something to change that.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-First impressions:
+==First impressions:==
 * Interesting site with some very interesting people
 * Could be much improved in terms of bias - though what wiki wouldn't be?
-Focus:
+==Focus:==
 * Sports!
 * Eliminate dishonest bias while recognizing and preserving the Conservative viewpoint of this encyclopedia