Talk:Sex addiction - Revision history

Ed Poor: moved Talk:Sexual addiction to Talk:Sex addiction: I think the shorter form of the term is used more commonly.

2011-08-19T20:54:47Z

moved Talk:Sexual addiction to Talk:Sex addiction: I think the shorter form of the term is used more commonly.

BenjaminS: /* Page Locked */

2008-12-08T19:17:55Z

Page Locked

Ed Poor: stick to the topic - or review Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks

2008-12-08T18:59:04Z

stick to the topic - or review Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks

Bugler: /* Page Locked */

2008-12-08T18:57:42Z

Page Locked

Ed Poor: be patient and fruitful

2008-12-08T18:52:42Z

be patient and fruitful

Bugler: Justify yourself, Benjamin.

2008-12-08T18:51:30Z

Justify yourself, Benjamin.

Ed Poor: call for sources

2008-12-08T18:32:50Z

call for sources

Philip J. Rayment: /* Link */ Yes, better

2008-03-02T04:07:19Z

Link: Yes, better

Philip J. Rayment: Fixed

2008-03-02T03:43:05Z

Fixed

AliceBG: New page: The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. ~~~~

2008-03-01T22:43:10Z

New page: The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. ~~~~

New page

The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, December 8, 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::''It is fostered by [[Liberal values]] of licentiousness and selfishness, and fuelled by the unhealthy obsessions of the [[Hollywood values]] set and the [[Liberal media]] that give them the oxygen of publicity.''		::::''It is fostered by [[Liberal values]] of licentiousness and selfishness, and fuelled by the unhealthy obsessions of the [[Hollywood values]] set and the [[Liberal media]] that give them the oxygen of publicity.''
	::{{personal remarks\|I also wish to register my disapproval - to put it mildly - of Benjamin's outrageous accusation that I treat Conservapedia as my 'blog'.}} [[User:Bugler\|Bugler]] 13:57, 8 December 2008 (EST)		::{{personal remarks\|I also wish to register my disapproval - to put it mildly - of Benjamin's outrageous accusation that I treat Conservapedia as my 'blog'.}} [[User:Bugler\|Bugler]] 13:57, 8 December 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	My objection to your passage (as I mentioned when I removed it) is that it is an unscourced opinion. While I partially agree with your passage, it still needs to be sourced. Also, unless you find a very scientific study which comes to the above conclusion, make sure you state it as an opinion. I protected the page because you replaced the passage without so much as addressing my concerns. --[[User:BenjaminS\|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS\|Talk]]</sub> 14:17, 8 December 2008 (EST)

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 ::This is the passage censored, and I stand by every word:
 ::::''It is fostered by [[Liberal values]] of licentiousness and selfishness, and fuelled by the unhealthy obsessions of the [[Hollywood values]] set and the [[Liberal media]] that give them the oxygen of publicity.''
-::I also wish to register my disapproval - to put it mildly - of Benjamin's outrageous accusation that I treat Conservapedia as my 'blog'. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:57, 8 December 2008 (EST)
+::{{personal remarks|I also wish to register my disapproval - to put it mildly - of Benjamin's outrageous accusation that I treat Conservapedia as my 'blog'.}} [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:57, 8 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, December 8, 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:No need. I trust his judgment. If you have any ideas for adding to the page, please record them here. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 13:52, 8 December 2008 (EST)		:No need. I trust his judgment. If you have any ideas for adding to the page, please record them here. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 13:52, 8 December 2008 (EST)
		+	::This is the passage censored, and I stand by every word:
		+	::::''It is fostered by [[Liberal values]] of licentiousness and selfishness, and fuelled by the unhealthy obsessions of the [[Hollywood values]] set and the [[Liberal media]] that give them the oxygen of publicity.''
		+	::I also wish to register my disapproval - to put it mildly - of Benjamin's outrageous accusation that I treat Conservapedia as my 'blog'. [[User:Bugler\|Bugler]] 13:57, 8 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, December 8, 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Page Locked==		==Page Locked==
	BenjaminS can attempt to justify his action here. [[User:Bugler\|Bugler]] 13:51, 8 December 2008 (EST)		BenjaminS can attempt to justify his action here. [[User:Bugler\|Bugler]] 13:51, 8 December 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	:No need. I trust his judgment. If you have any ideas for adding to the page, please record them here. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 13:52, 8 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, December 8, 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	All this needs to be sourced. Who said what? --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 13:32, 8 December 2008 (EST)		All this needs to be sourced. Who said what? --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 13:32, 8 December 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	==Page Locked==
		+	BenjaminS can attempt to justify his action here. [[User:Bugler\|Bugler]] 13:51, 8 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:54, August 19, 2011
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, December 8, 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)		:I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)
	:: After drafting my edit I did very briefly (too briefly?) consider referring to pornography, but wondered if it was too limiting. Nevertheless, I agree that your wording is better. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:07, 1 March 2008 (EST)		:: After drafting my edit I did very briefly (too briefly?) consider referring to pornography, but wondered if it was too limiting. Nevertheless, I agree that your wording is better. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:07, 1 March 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	==Opinion==
		+
		+	Cut from article:
		+	:Sexual addiction has always happened. On particularly harmful form is married couples put pressure on their spouse to have very much more sex than the partner wants. This can in the worst cases lead to [[Marital rape]] and divorce. One should in no way encourage addiction to Internet porn. Despite this Internet porn addiction is the lesser evil compared to some other behaviours.
		+
		+	:Once sex of any kind becomes uncontrollable the person involved does not exercise [[Free will]].
		+
		+	All this needs to be sourced. Who said what? --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 13:32, 8 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:07, March 2, 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. [[User:AliceBG\|AliceBG]] 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)		The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. [[User:AliceBG\|AliceBG]] 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)
	:I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)		:I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)
		+	:: After drafting my edit I did very briefly (too briefly?) consider referring to pornography, but wondered if it was too limiting. Nevertheless, I agree that your wording is better. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:07, 1 March 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, March 2, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Link ==
	The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. [[User:AliceBG\|AliceBG]] 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)		The link to sex leads to a discussion of gender - not really germane to the article at hand. [[User:AliceBG\|AliceBG]] 17:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)
		+	:I've changed it, although I'm not particularly happy with the wording. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:43, 1 March 2008 (EST)