Talk:Obamaisms - Revision history

RobSmith: moved Talk:Obama-isms to Talk:Obamaisms

2009-08-26T04:51:03Z

moved Talk:Obama-isms to Talk:Obamaisms

RobSmith: /* Sourcing and chronology */

2009-08-19T16:53:54Z

Sourcing and chronology

RobSmith: comment

2009-08-19T16:53:29Z

comment

AddisonDM at 18:47, February 28, 2009

2009-02-28T18:47:08Z

JY23: /* Merge idea */ new section

2009-02-19T02:07:28Z

Merge idea: new section

Brendanw: /* Mockery */ new section

2009-02-02T05:21:44Z

Mockery: new section

AddisonDM at 03:13, January 19, 2009

2009-01-19T03:13:51Z

SJames: contrast with Bushisms

2009-01-19T02:36:21Z

contrast with Bushisms

TK at 02:04, January 19, 2009

2009-01-19T02:04:04Z

AddisonDM at 22:20, January 18, 2009

2009-01-18T22:20:31Z

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 :That's an interesting idea. I'll think about it. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 13:47, 28 February 2009 (EST)
-==Sourcing and chronolgy==
+==Sourcing and chronology==
 We should try to provide a link for each entry as it occurs and give a date.  This may be a project for the whole community to get involved to keep a catalogue in a running sequence.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 12:53, 19 August 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, August 19, 2009
Line 37:		Line 37:

	:That's an interesting idea. I'll think about it. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 13:47, 28 February 2009 (EST)		:That's an interesting idea. I'll think about it. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 13:47, 28 February 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	==Sourcing and chronolgy==
		+
		+	We should try to provide a link for each entry as it occurs and give a date. This may be a project for the whole community to get involved to keep a catalogue in a running sequence. [[User:RobSmith\|Rob Smith]] 12:53, 19 August 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, February 28, 2009
Line 35:		Line 35:
	==Merge idea==		==Merge idea==
	I propose that we merge this article and the Bushisms into a to-be-created article called "Political Gaffes" or something along those lines, to include such as when Nancy Pelosi said that 500 million Americans would lose their jobs without the stimulus package. --[[User:JY23\|JY23]] 21:07, 18 February 2009 (EST)		I propose that we merge this article and the Bushisms into a to-be-created article called "Political Gaffes" or something along those lines, to include such as when Nancy Pelosi said that 500 million Americans would lose their jobs without the stimulus package. --[[User:JY23\|JY23]] 21:07, 18 February 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	:That's an interesting idea. I'll think about it. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 13:47, 28 February 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, February 19, 2009
Line 32:		Line 32:

	This article is mockery and should be deleted. --[[User:Brendanw\|Brendanw]] 00:21, 2 February 2009 (EST)		This article is mockery and should be deleted. --[[User:Brendanw\|Brendanw]] 00:21, 2 February 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	==Merge idea==
		+	I propose that we merge this article and the Bushisms into a to-be-created article called "Political Gaffes" or something along those lines, to include such as when Nancy Pelosi said that 500 million Americans would lose their jobs without the stimulus package. --[[User:JY23\|JY23]] 21:07, 18 February 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, February 2, 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:

	:Okay...I guess the term comes from conservatives! It's sort of reverse Bushisms. It's hyphenated because without the hyphen it would look odd: Obamaisms. The two vowels don't fit well. Google it with a hyphen and you'll get quite a few results. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 22:13, 18 January 2009 (EST)		:Okay...I guess the term comes from conservatives! It's sort of reverse Bushisms. It's hyphenated because without the hyphen it would look odd: Obamaisms. The two vowels don't fit well. Google it with a hyphen and you'll get quite a few results. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 22:13, 18 January 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	== Mockery ==
		+
		+	This article is mockery and should be deleted. --[[User:Brendanw\|Brendanw]] 00:21, 2 February 2009 (EST)

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:51, August 26, 2009
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, January 19, 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:
	* Just wondering: On the linked Bushisms page, it states it is a term coined by liberals and the article is also placed under the category of Liberal bias. From which political group is "Obama-isms" coined by and does this need mentioning?		* Just wondering: On the linked Bushisms page, it states it is a term coined by liberals and the article is also placed under the category of Liberal bias. From which political group is "Obama-isms" coined by and does this need mentioning?
	* Also, is there a reason why one is hyphenated while the other isn't? Maybe it's better to gain some consistency in these respects. [[User:SJames\|SJames]] 21:36, 18 January 2009 (EST)		* Also, is there a reason why one is hyphenated while the other isn't? Maybe it's better to gain some consistency in these respects. [[User:SJames\|SJames]] 21:36, 18 January 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	:Okay...I guess the term comes from conservatives! It's sort of reverse Bushisms. It's hyphenated because without the hyphen it would look odd: Obamaisms. The two vowels don't fit well. Google it with a hyphen and you'll get quite a few results. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 22:13, 18 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, January 19, 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:Fine, Addison....my only point was to allow time for someone to respond when asking, as the removed user did, before removing Admin edits. Thanks for helping clear this up. --[[User:TK\|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK\|/Talk]]</sup> 21:04, 18 January 2009 (EST)		:Fine, Addison....my only point was to allow time for someone to respond when asking, as the removed user did, before removing Admin edits. Thanks for helping clear this up. --[[User:TK\|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK\|/Talk]]</sup> 21:04, 18 January 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	* Just wondering: On the linked Bushisms page, it states it is a term coined by liberals and the article is also placed under the category of Liberal bias. From which political group is "Obama-isms" coined by and does this need mentioning?
		+	* Also, is there a reason why one is hyphenated while the other isn't? Maybe it's better to gain some consistency in these respects. [[User:SJames\|SJames]] 21:36, 18 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, January 19, 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	What I meant was, the line "Our soldiers fight and die in 120-degree heat" is not a gaffe, and yet is included in this list. I'm saying it should either be "20-degree heat" which is what the gaffe is supposed to be, or the whole should be removed if he never actually said it. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 17:20, 18 January 2009 (EST)		What I meant was, the line "Our soldiers fight and die in 120-degree heat" is not a gaffe, and yet is included in this list. I'm saying it should either be "20-degree heat" which is what the gaffe is supposed to be, or the whole should be removed if he never actually said it. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 17:20, 18 January 2009 (EST)
		+
		+	:Fine, Addison....my only point was to allow time for someone to respond when asking, as the removed user did, before removing Admin edits. Thanks for helping clear this up. --[[User:TK\|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK\|/Talk]]</sup> 21:04, 18 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, January 18, 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:::I didn't change the line to 120. Unless you mean I mentioned it on this talk page, I wasn't sure which you meant.		:::I didn't change the line to 120. Unless you mean I mentioned it on this talk page, I wasn't sure which you meant.
		+
		+	What I meant was, the line "Our soldiers fight and die in 120-degree heat" is not a gaffe, and yet is included in this list. I'm saying it should either be "20-degree heat" which is what the gaffe is supposed to be, or the whole should be removed if he never actually said it. [[User:AddisonDM\|AddisonDM]] 17:20, 18 January 2009 (EST)