Talk:Liberal Hatred - Revision history

Conlibtar at 20:57, March 2, 2012

2012-03-02T20:57:25Z

Conlibtar at 20:52, March 2, 2012

2012-03-02T20:52:23Z

Conlibtar at 20:52, March 2, 2012

2012-03-02T20:52:07Z

Conlibtar at 20:51, March 2, 2012

2012-03-02T20:51:37Z

JLefkowitz at 20:39, March 2, 2012

2012-03-02T20:39:17Z

Conlibtar at 20:30, March 2, 2012

2012-03-02T20:30:42Z

JLefkowitz: Created page with "Don't we have about twenty (hyperbole) different articles already like this? All these articles against liberals should really just be lumped into one index, with different secti..."

2012-03-02T20:17:27Z

Created page with "Don't we have about twenty (hyperbole) different articles already like this? All these articles against liberals should really just be lumped into one index, with different secti..."

New page

Don't we have about twenty (hyperbole) different articles already like this? All these articles against liberals should really just be lumped into one index, with different sections for each type of bad thing, like the Examples of Bias in Wikipedia page. [[User:JLefkowitz|JLefkowitz]] 15:17, 2 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, March 2, 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)		But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)

−	Hmm. That is just the way this encyclopedia is set up. Just at the article "Liberal Obsession" and you'll see that it is set up almost exactly like this article. Also, if you'll look at the "Homosexuality" article, you'll see that it has around 30 sections; and that is ''while'' there are also separate articles about homosexuality. If we were to condense all articles related to liberalism into one article, I fear that it may also turn out the same. This is why we need to break down articles. --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:51, 2 March 2012 (EST)	+	Hmm. That is just the way this encyclopedia is set up. Just look at the article "Liberal Obsession" and you'll see that it is set up almost exactly like this article. Also, if you'll look at the "Homosexuality" article, you'll see that it has around 30 sections; and that is ''while'' there are also separate articles about homosexuality. If we were to condense all articles related to liberalism into one article, I fear that it may also turn out the same. This is why we need to break down articles. --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:51, 2 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, March 2, 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)		But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)

−	~~*Shrug~~ That is just the way this encyclopedia is set up. Just at the article "Liberal Obsession" and you'll see that it is set up almost exactly like this article. Also, if you'll look at the "Homosexuality" article, you'll see that it has around 30 sections; and that is ''while'' there are also separate articles about homosexuality. If we were to condense all articles related to liberalism into one article, I fear that it may also turn out the same. This is why we need to break down articles. --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:51, 2 March 2012 (EST)	+	Hmm. That is just the way this encyclopedia is set up. Just at the article "Liberal Obsession" and you'll see that it is set up almost exactly like this article. Also, if you'll look at the "Homosexuality" article, you'll see that it has around 30 sections; and that is ''while'' there are also separate articles about homosexuality. If we were to condense all articles related to liberalism into one article, I fear that it may also turn out the same. This is why we need to break down articles. --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:51, 2 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, March 2, 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)		But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)

−	Shrug That is just the way this encyclopedia is set up. Just at the article "Liberal Obsession" and you'll see that it is set up almost exactly like this article. Also, if you'll look at the "Homosexuality" article, you'll see that it has around 30 sections; and that is ''while'' there are also separate articles about homosexuality. If we were to condense all articles related to liberalism into one article, I fear that it may also turn out the same. This is why we need to break down articles. --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:51, 2 March 2012 (EST)	+	*Shrug That is just the way this encyclopedia is set up. Just at the article "Liberal Obsession" and you'll see that it is set up almost exactly like this article. Also, if you'll look at the "Homosexuality" article, you'll see that it has around 30 sections; and that is ''while'' there are also separate articles about homosexuality. If we were to condense all articles related to liberalism into one article, I fear that it may also turn out the same. This is why we need to break down articles. --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:51, 2 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, March 2, 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)		But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)
		+
		+	Shrug That is just the way this encyclopedia is set up. Just at the article "Liberal Obsession" and you'll see that it is set up almost exactly like this article. Also, if you'll look at the "Homosexuality" article, you'll see that it has around 30 sections; and that is ''while'' there are also separate articles about homosexuality. If we were to condense all articles related to liberalism into one article, I fear that it may also turn out the same. This is why we need to break down articles. --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:51, 2 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, March 2, 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Even though its good to have articles that talk about each subject in general, we should also have articles which concentrate on sub-topics of each subject as well. Besides we also have a variety of articles about "homosexuality" and "atheism." --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:30, 2 March 2012 (EST)		Even though its good to have articles that talk about each subject in general, we should also have articles which concentrate on sub-topics of each subject as well. Besides we also have a variety of articles about "homosexuality" and "atheism." --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:30, 2 March 2012 (EST)
		+
		+	But is it really worth it to have something like Liberal Hatred when we've already got over 80 articles beginning with the phrase "liberal"--just in the category of Liberalism? We could just as easily paste the examples in a synonym of the word "hatred". I don't agree with the fact that there are so many, mostly ad-hominem, articles on subtopics of homosexuality and atheism. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:39, 2 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, March 2, 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Don't we have about twenty (hyperbole) different articles already like this? All these articles against liberals should really just be lumped into one index, with different sections for each type of bad thing, like the Examples of Bias in Wikipedia page. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:17, 2 March 2012 (EST)		Don't we have about twenty (hyperbole) different articles already like this? All these articles against liberals should really just be lumped into one index, with different sections for each type of bad thing, like the Examples of Bias in Wikipedia page. [[User:JLefkowitz\|JLefkowitz]] 15:17, 2 March 2012 (EST)
		+
		+	Even though its good to have articles that talk about each subject in general, we should also have articles which concentrate on sub-topics of each subject as well. Besides we also have a variety of articles about "homosexuality" and "atheism." --[[User:Conlibtar\|Conlibtar]] 15:30, 2 March 2012 (EST)