Talk:Cyprus - Revision history

Allthatjazz: Talk about improving the article

2019-02-09T23:55:52Z

Talk about improving the article

Karajou at 22:02, July 30, 2009

2009-07-30T22:02:38Z

Davidklein at 21:49, July 30, 2009

2009-07-30T21:49:56Z

Davidklein: Crickets

2009-05-05T12:42:25Z

Crickets

Davidklein at 13:26, February 16, 2009

2009-02-16T13:26:06Z

Davidklein: Question about updating geographical/geo-political pages.

2008-12-29T12:05:06Z

Question about updating geographical/geo-political pages.

New page

This page, and many other country pages on Conservapedia, seems to have been largely copied wholesale from the US Department of State website ([http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5376.htm here]) and has only tiny snippets of the original Conservapedia article. The article is now somewhat out of date, so my question is: should this page (and the others that are out of date) be re-copied from the DoS website or should Conservapedia editors be updating the pages themselves?

Is it even right that the concise versions of these pages have been replaced by the DoS text, when we could simply put a link at the bottom of the page saying something like, "For further information, please see [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5376.htm here.]"? [[User:Davidklein|Davidklein]] 07:05, 29 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, February 9, 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	First, in answer to your original question, the answer is yes where convenient. Conservapedia editors can and should make updates to these articles as necessary. Second, the link at the bottom is to identify the source of the public domain text used for the articles, and these tags should stay; they can be removed only if the text is completely original. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 18:02, 30 July 2009 (EDT)		First, in answer to your original question, the answer is yes where convenient. Conservapedia editors can and should make updates to these articles as necessary. Second, the link at the bottom is to identify the source of the public domain text used for the articles, and these tags should stay; they can be removed only if the text is completely original. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 18:02, 30 July 2009 (EDT)
		+
		+	I will try to improve the article in the following days. If anyone wants to give any information he can do it here.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, July 30, 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::''Crickets'' [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:42, 5 May 2009 (EDT)		::''Crickets'' [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:42, 5 May 2009 (EDT)
	:::''Tumbleweed'' [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 17:49, 30 July 2009 (EDT)		:::''Tumbleweed'' [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 17:49, 30 July 2009 (EDT)
		+
		+	First, in answer to your original question, the answer is yes where convenient. Conservapedia editors can and should make updates to these articles as necessary. Second, the link at the bottom is to identify the source of the public domain text used for the articles, and these tags should stay; they can be removed only if the text is completely original. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 18:02, 30 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, July 30, 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Anybody? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:26, 16 February 2009 (EST)		:Anybody? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:26, 16 February 2009 (EST)
	::''Crickets'' [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:42, 5 May 2009 (EDT)		::''Crickets'' [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:42, 5 May 2009 (EDT)
		+	:::''Tumbleweed'' [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 17:49, 30 July 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, May 5, 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Is it even right that the concise versions of these pages have been replaced by the DoS text, when we could simply put a link at the bottom of the page saying something like, "For further information, please see [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5376.htm here.]"? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 07:05, 29 December 2008 (EST)		Is it even right that the concise versions of these pages have been replaced by the DoS text, when we could simply put a link at the bottom of the page saying something like, "For further information, please see [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5376.htm here.]"? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 07:05, 29 December 2008 (EST)
	:Anybody? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:26, 16 February 2009 (EST)		:Anybody? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:26, 16 February 2009 (EST)
		+	::''Crickets'' [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:42, 5 May 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, February 16, 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Is it even right that the concise versions of these pages have been replaced by the DoS text, when we could simply put a link at the bottom of the page saying something like, "For further information, please see [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5376.htm here.]"? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 07:05, 29 December 2008 (EST)		Is it even right that the concise versions of these pages have been replaced by the DoS text, when we could simply put a link at the bottom of the page saying something like, "For further information, please see [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5376.htm here.]"? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 07:05, 29 December 2008 (EST)
		+	:Anybody? [[User:Davidklein\|Davidklein]] 08:26, 16 February 2009 (EST)