Talk:Anagram - Revision history

Sideways: /* Conservapedia anagrams */ removed a few weaker ones

2008-10-01T12:39:43Z

Conservapedia anagrams: removed a few weaker ones

Sideways: /* Conservapedia anagrams */ new section

2008-10-01T12:36:23Z

Conservapedia anagrams: new section

Philip J. Rayment: /* Standards */ yes

2008-10-01T12:10:20Z

Standards: yes

LiamG at 11:22, October 1, 2008

2008-10-01T11:22:50Z

Philip J. Rayment: /* Standards */ Agree

2008-10-01T09:44:44Z

Standards: Agree

BrianCo: typo

2008-10-01T09:17:50Z

typo

BrianCo: /* Standards */ new section

2008-10-01T09:17:15Z

Standards: new section

Foxtrot: reply to Taj

2008-09-30T21:39:37Z

reply to Taj

NathanG: slip of the tongue

2008-09-30T18:53:49Z

slip of the tongue

NathanG at 18:53, September 30, 2008

2008-09-30T18:53:35Z

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 :[[liberal deceit]] = creditable lie - celibrate idler
-:[[liberal fairness]] = as liberals infer - a fireball's risen - rainfall is beers - frailer lesbians
+:[[liberal fairness]] = as liberals infer - a fireball's risen - frailer lesbians
 :[[hollywood values]] = a loud lovely show - you loved shallow
-:[[professor values]] = espousal's fervor - spousal forevers - espresso flavour - reversal of soups - lovers fear soups - revalues for sops - reveals sour fops - several sour fops - loafer versus sop - oversea fop's slur - ours proves false - refusals prove so - etc.
+:[[professor values]] = espousal's fervor - espresso flavour - revalues for sops - reveals sour fops - loafer versus sop - oversea fop's slur - ours proves false - refusals prove so - etc.
 I used [http://wordsmith.org/anagram/ this] anagram generator if anybody wants to join in.  [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 08:36, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:36, October 1, 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:
	::Do we do external links? This site, [http://wordsmith.org/anagram/ Internet Anagram Server], is a great place to both find anagrams and learn more about them. [[User:LiamG\|LiamG]] 07:22, 1 October 2008 (EDT)		::Do we do external links? This site, [http://wordsmith.org/anagram/ Internet Anagram Server], is a great place to both find anagrams and learn more about them. [[User:LiamG\|LiamG]] 07:22, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
	::: Yes, we do external links. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 1 October 2008 (EDT)		::: Yes, we do external links. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Conservapedia anagrams ==
		+
		+	What about some appropriate & amusing anagrams of some [[conservapedia terms]]?
		+
		+	:[[last wordism]] = dismal worst
		+
		+	:[[liberal denial]] = idle ballerina
		+
		+	:[[liberal deceit]] = creditable lie - celibrate idler
		+
		+	:[[liberal fairness]] = as liberals infer - a fireball's risen - rainfall is beers - frailer lesbians
		+
		+	:[[hollywood values]] = a loud lovely show - you loved shallow
		+
		+	:[[professor values]] = espousal's fervor - spousal forevers - espresso flavour - reversal of soups - lovers fear soups - revalues for sops - reveals sour fops - several sour fops - loafer versus sop - oversea fop's slur - ours proves false - refusals prove so - etc.
		+
		+	I used [http://wordsmith.org/anagram/ this] anagram generator if anybody wants to join in. [[User:Sideways\|Sideways]] 08:36, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, October 1, 2008
Line 23:		Line 23:
	: I agree with that, BrianCo. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:44, 1 October 2008 (EDT)		: I agree with that, BrianCo. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:44, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
	::Do we do external links? This site, [http://wordsmith.org/anagram/ Internet Anagram Server], is a great place to both find anagrams and learn more about them. [[User:LiamG\|LiamG]] 07:22, 1 October 2008 (EDT)		::Do we do external links? This site, [http://wordsmith.org/anagram/ Internet Anagram Server], is a great place to both find anagrams and learn more about them. [[User:LiamG\|LiamG]] 07:22, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
		+	::: Yes, we do external links. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, October 1, 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:
	This article is getting silly and I intend to unilaterally impose some standards. It is really only necessary to have one or two examples to illustrate the term so we don't need a great long list. This is meant to be an encyclopedia not [[The Daily Show]]. As there is a limitless number of possible anagrams the words ought to be correctly spelled English or recognized contractions, "Aaak" just doesn't cut it. However, a witty anagram into French or Latin should also count. It is amusing if the anagram actually relates to the first term or name so a random assortment of words that have no relevance will be removed. If you disagree then please debate your case below. [[User:BrianCo\|BrianCo]] 05:17, 1 October 2008 (EDT)		This article is getting silly and I intend to unilaterally impose some standards. It is really only necessary to have one or two examples to illustrate the term so we don't need a great long list. This is meant to be an encyclopedia not [[The Daily Show]]. As there is a limitless number of possible anagrams the words ought to be correctly spelled English or recognized contractions, "Aaak" just doesn't cut it. However, a witty anagram into French or Latin should also count. It is amusing if the anagram actually relates to the first term or name so a random assortment of words that have no relevance will be removed. If you disagree then please debate your case below. [[User:BrianCo\|BrianCo]] 05:17, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
	: I agree with that, BrianCo. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:44, 1 October 2008 (EDT)		: I agree with that, BrianCo. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:44, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
		+	::Do we do external links? This site, [http://wordsmith.org/anagram/ Internet Anagram Server], is a great place to both find anagrams and learn more about them. [[User:LiamG\|LiamG]] 07:22, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:44, October 1, 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:

	This article is getting silly and I intend to unilaterally impose some standards. It is really only necessary to have one or two examples to illustrate the term so we don't need a great long list. This is meant to be an encyclopedia not [[The Daily Show]]. As there is a limitless number of possible anagrams the words ought to be correctly spelled English or recognized contractions, "Aaak" just doesn't cut it. However, a witty anagram into French or Latin should also count. It is amusing if the anagram actually relates to the first term or name so a random assortment of words that have no relevance will be removed. If you disagree then please debate your case below. [[User:BrianCo\|BrianCo]] 05:17, 1 October 2008 (EDT)		This article is getting silly and I intend to unilaterally impose some standards. It is really only necessary to have one or two examples to illustrate the term so we don't need a great long list. This is meant to be an encyclopedia not [[The Daily Show]]. As there is a limitless number of possible anagrams the words ought to be correctly spelled English or recognized contractions, "Aaak" just doesn't cut it. However, a witty anagram into French or Latin should also count. It is amusing if the anagram actually relates to the first term or name so a random assortment of words that have no relevance will be removed. If you disagree then please debate your case below. [[User:BrianCo\|BrianCo]] 05:17, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
		+	: I agree with that, BrianCo. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:44, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, October 1, 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	== Standards ==		== Standards ==

−	This article is getting silly and I intend to unilaterally impose some standards. It is really only necessary to have one or two examples to illustrate the term so we don't need a great long list. This is meant to be an encyclopedia not [[The Daily Show]] or As there is a limitless number of possible anagrams the words ought to be correctly spelled English or recognized contractions, "Aaak" just doesn't cut it. However, a witty anagram into French or Latin should also count. It is amusing if the anagram actually relates to the first term or name so a random assortment of words that have no relevance will be removed. If you disagree then please debate your case below. [[User:BrianCo\|BrianCo]] 05:17, 1 October 2008 (EDT)	+	This article is getting silly and I intend to unilaterally impose some standards. It is really only necessary to have one or two examples to illustrate the term so we don't need a great long list. This is meant to be an encyclopedia not [[The Daily Show]]. As there is a limitless number of possible anagrams the words ought to be correctly spelled English or recognized contractions, "Aaak" just doesn't cut it. However, a witty anagram into French or Latin should also count. It is amusing if the anagram actually relates to the first term or name so a random assortment of words that have no relevance will be removed. If you disagree then please debate your case below. [[User:BrianCo\|BrianCo]] 05:17, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, October 1, 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:

	(to Taj) Yes, we want to build a reputable encyclopedia, but that comes from having strong entries on serious topics. This entry and its examples are more of a fun page rather than some scholarly treatise. So there's freedom to have some silly anagrams, like the Obama one or the Ross Perot and George Bush ones. Should we remove the Ross Perot one as well? It doesn't say something positive about him, but I think it's ultimately harmless and clearly a joke like the Obama one. -[[User:Foxtrot\|Foxtrot]] 17:39, 30 September 2008 (EDT)		(to Taj) Yes, we want to build a reputable encyclopedia, but that comes from having strong entries on serious topics. This entry and its examples are more of a fun page rather than some scholarly treatise. So there's freedom to have some silly anagrams, like the Obama one or the Ross Perot and George Bush ones. Should we remove the Ross Perot one as well? It doesn't say something positive about him, but I think it's ultimately harmless and clearly a joke like the Obama one. -[[User:Foxtrot\|Foxtrot]] 17:39, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Standards ==
		+
		+	This article is getting silly and I intend to unilaterally impose some standards. It is really only necessary to have one or two examples to illustrate the term so we don't need a great long list. This is meant to be an encyclopedia not [[The Daily Show]] or As there is a limitless number of possible anagrams the words ought to be correctly spelled English or recognized contractions, "Aaak" just doesn't cut it. However, a witty anagram into French or Latin should also count. It is amusing if the anagram actually relates to the first term or name so a random assortment of words that have no relevance will be removed. If you disagree then please debate your case below. [[User:BrianCo\|BrianCo]] 05:17, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, September 30, 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::::I have absolutely no idea what you are off on a tangent about now. My opinion is that we don't need to include an anagram of Barack Obama's name. (This is the "Anagram" talk page, hello?) Whatever else you have issues with, take up with those people at those places... mmmkay? thanx [[User:Taj\|Taj]] 14:51, 30 September 2008 (EDT)		::::::I have absolutely no idea what you are off on a tangent about now. My opinion is that we don't need to include an anagram of Barack Obama's name. (This is the "Anagram" talk page, hello?) Whatever else you have issues with, take up with those people at those places... mmmkay? thanx [[User:Taj\|Taj]] 14:51, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
	:::::::Karajou is ignoring me. o.O [[User:NathanG\|Nate]] <sup>[[User_talk:NathanG\|my opinion matters?]]</sup> 14:53, 30 September 2008 (EDT)		:::::::Karajou is ignoring me. o.O [[User:NathanG\|Nate]] <sup>[[User_talk:NathanG\|my opinion matters?]]</sup> 14:53, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	(to Taj) Yes, we want to build a reputable encyclopedia, but that comes from having strong entries on serious topics. This entry and its examples are more of a fun page rather than some scholarly treatise. So there's freedom to have some silly anagrams, like the Obama one or the Ross Perot and George Bush ones. Should we remove the Ross Perot one as well? It doesn't say something positive about him, but I think it's ultimately harmless and clearly a joke like the Obama one. -[[User:Foxtrot\|Foxtrot]] 17:39, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:53, September 30, 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:

	::::::I have absolutely no idea what you are off on a tangent about now. My opinion is that we don't need to include an anagram of Barack Obama's name. (This is the "Anagram" talk page, hello?) Whatever else you have issues with, take up with those people at those places... mmmkay? thanx [[User:Taj\|Taj]] 14:51, 30 September 2008 (EDT)		::::::I have absolutely no idea what you are off on a tangent about now. My opinion is that we don't need to include an anagram of Barack Obama's name. (This is the "Anagram" talk page, hello?) Whatever else you have issues with, take up with those people at those places... mmmkay? thanx [[User:Taj\|Taj]] 14:51, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
−	:::::::~~Karajerk~~ is ignoring me. o.O [[User:NathanG\|Nate]] <sup>[[User_talk:NathanG\|my opinion matters?]]</sup> 14:53, 30 September 2008 (EDT)	+	:::::::Karajou is ignoring me. o.O [[User:NathanG\|Nate]] <sup>[[User_talk:NathanG\|my opinion matters?]]</sup> 14:53, 30 September 2008 (EDT)