Talk:Abstinence - Revision history

Alex00: /* Virtues */ new section

2013-04-09T14:38:55Z

Virtues: new section

Daniel1212: /* Balance */

2010-05-02T14:30:52Z

Balance

WilliamH: /* Balance */

2008-06-01T22:10:56Z

Balance

ComplexModulo: /* Balance */

2008-06-01T20:50:52Z

Balance

WilliamH: /* Balance */

2008-06-01T19:48:26Z

Balance

ComplexModulo: /* Balance */

2008-06-01T19:38:30Z

Balance

Learn together: /* Balance */

2008-03-25T18:24:09Z

Balance

Potatocakes: Balance

2008-03-25T10:20:13Z

Balance

Blinkadyblink: Clinton and Heritage Foundation

2008-02-19T04:14:23Z

Clinton and Heritage Foundation

Hsmom: /* Concerns about Use of Necklace Image */ Is the use of this image appropriate under fair use copyright standards?

2007-09-19T02:25:08Z

Concerns about Use of Necklace Image: Is the use of this image appropriate under fair use copyright standards?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:38, April 9, 2013
Line 52:		Line 52:

	More than 50 studies document the findings, yet the correlation remains widely unknown by the public, she notes. The PRI researcher says one reason for this is because some of the people involved in the studies have a vested interest in contraceptive distribution. http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=994078 [[User:Daniel1212\|Daniel1212]] 10:30, 2 May 2010 (EDT)		More than 50 studies document the findings, yet the correlation remains widely unknown by the public, she notes. The PRI researcher says one reason for this is because some of the people involved in the studies have a vested interest in contraceptive distribution. http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=994078 [[User:Daniel1212\|Daniel1212]] 10:30, 2 May 2010 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Virtues ==
		+
		+	Please add the [[Template:Virtues]]. --[[User:Alex00\|Alex00]] 10:38, 9 April 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, May 2, 2010
Line 42:		Line 42:
	I disagree. I can have my own reasons, many of which you have included on the site, for wanting to be abstinent, and not be a Christian/believe in God.		I disagree. I can have my own reasons, many of which you have included on the site, for wanting to be abstinent, and not be a Christian/believe in God.
	:I'm not denying that there are more reasons to practice abstinence than that, I'm saying that you're missing tons of benefits from not having Jesus Christ be your spiritual guide. [[User:WilliamH\|WilliamH]] 18:10, 1 June 2008 (EDT)		:I'm not denying that there are more reasons to practice abstinence than that, I'm saying that you're missing tons of benefits from not having Jesus Christ be your spiritual guide. [[User:WilliamH\|WilliamH]] 18:10, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Study: Contraception tied to HIV/AIDS==
		+
		+	A study shows that use of a contraceptive pill is linked to a higher chance of contracting HIV/AIDS.
		+
		+	Joan Robinson, a researcher at the Population Research Institute (PRI), reports that there is a strong scientific link between the two.
		+
		+	"It increases all the known risk factors from upping the risk of infection, to increasing the viral replication of the HIV virus, to speeding the debilitating effects and the deadly progression of the disease," Robinson notes.
		+
		+	More than 50 studies document the findings, yet the correlation remains widely unknown by the public, she notes. The PRI researcher says one reason for this is because some of the people involved in the studies have a vested interest in contraceptive distribution. http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=994078 [[User:Daniel1212\|Daniel1212]] 10:30, 2 May 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, June 1, 2008
Line 41:		Line 41:

	I disagree. I can have my own reasons, many of which you have included on the site, for wanting to be abstinent, and not be a Christian/believe in God.		I disagree. I can have my own reasons, many of which you have included on the site, for wanting to be abstinent, and not be a Christian/believe in God.
		+	:I'm not denying that there are more reasons to practice abstinence than that, I'm saying that you're missing tons of benefits from not having Jesus Christ be your spiritual guide. [[User:WilliamH\|WilliamH]] 18:10, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, June 1, 2008
Line 39:		Line 39:
	I don't like the first reason for being abstinent. What if we do not believe in God?		I don't like the first reason for being abstinent. What if we do not believe in God?
	:Then abstinence/non-abstinence is the least of your problems. [[User:WilliamH\|WilliamH]] 15:48, 1 June 2008 (EDT)		:Then abstinence/non-abstinence is the least of your problems. [[User:WilliamH\|WilliamH]] 15:48, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	I disagree. I can have my own reasons, many of which you have included on the site, for wanting to be abstinent, and not be a Christian/believe in God.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, June 1, 2008
Line 38:		Line 38:

	I don't like the first reason for being abstinent. What if we do not believe in God?		I don't like the first reason for being abstinent. What if we do not believe in God?
		+	:Then abstinence/non-abstinence is the least of your problems. [[User:WilliamH\|WilliamH]] 15:48, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, June 1, 2008
Line 36:		Line 36:

	:Perhaps you should first discuss here what you think are arguments against abstinence. While it is a personal decision, the benefits certainly seem to be strong for those who choose that path until marriage. [[User:Learn together\|Learn together]] 14:24, 25 March 2008 (EDT)		:Perhaps you should first discuss here what you think are arguments against abstinence. While it is a personal decision, the benefits certainly seem to be strong for those who choose that path until marriage. [[User:Learn together\|Learn together]] 14:24, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	I don't like the first reason for being abstinent. What if we do not believe in God?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, March 25, 2008
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Can we balance out the Benefits of abstinence, with an arguments against abstinence section?		Can we balance out the Benefits of abstinence, with an arguments against abstinence section?
		+
		+	:Perhaps you should first discuss here what you think are arguments against abstinence. While it is a personal decision, the benefits certainly seem to be strong for those who choose that path until marriage. [[User:Learn together\|Learn together]] 14:24, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:20, March 25, 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:

	If the article goes to the trouble of pointing out that Clinton is liberal, shouldn't it also mention that the [[Heritage Foundation]] is conservative? [[User:Blinkadyblink\|Blinkadyblink]] 23:14, 18 February 2008 (EST)		If the article goes to the trouble of pointing out that Clinton is liberal, shouldn't it also mention that the [[Heritage Foundation]] is conservative? [[User:Blinkadyblink\|Blinkadyblink]] 23:14, 18 February 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	== Balance ==
		+
		+	Can we balance out the Benefits of abstinence, with an arguments against abstinence section?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, February 19, 2008
Line 26:		Line 26:
	==Concerns about Use of Necklace Image==		==Concerns about Use of Necklace Image==
	I am concerned that using the image of the necklace in this article does not meet "fair use" standards, as it is not used to illustrate an article about the necklace. See [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Beads_MFA_Boston.jpg]. It is also unclear how the image and the article are related. The image belongs to the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. I am far from an expert on copyright issues or the image in question; I just wanted to bring the question to the attention of others who are more qualified to make an appropriate decision regarding the use of the image.--[[User:Hsmom\|Hsmom]] 22:25, 18 September 2007 (EDT)		I am concerned that using the image of the necklace in this article does not meet "fair use" standards, as it is not used to illustrate an article about the necklace. See [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Beads_MFA_Boston.jpg]. It is also unclear how the image and the article are related. The image belongs to the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. I am far from an expert on copyright issues or the image in question; I just wanted to bring the question to the attention of others who are more qualified to make an appropriate decision regarding the use of the image.--[[User:Hsmom\|Hsmom]] 22:25, 18 September 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Clinton and Heritage Foundation ==
		+
		+	If the article goes to the trouble of pointing out that Clinton is liberal, shouldn't it also mention that the [[Heritage Foundation]] is conservative? [[User:Blinkadyblink\|Blinkadyblink]] 23:14, 18 February 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, September 19, 2007
Line 24:		Line 24:
	:''A study by Mathematica Policy Research, funded by President Bill Clinton's administration, of four abstinence education programs funded under Title V Section 510 "had no effect on the sexual abstinence of youth."<ref>Mathematica Policy Research: Impacts of Four Abstinence Education Programs[http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/abstinencereport.asp]</ref> The authors point out that "Most Title V, Section 510 abstinence education programs are implemented in upper elementary and middle schools and most are completed before youth enter high school", and note that "the findings provide no information on the effects programs might have if they were implemented in high school or began at earlier ages but continued through high school." The Family Research Council added that "one logical conclusion is that to achieve the greatest effectiveness, programs must be intensive and long-term, so that the knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to reject sex before marriage are constantly reinforced--particularly in the pivotal high school years."<ref>Family Research Council: Mathematica Study Doesn't Add Up to the End of Abstinence[http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=WU07D09]</ref>--[[User:Hsmom\|Hsmom]] 08:09, 18 September 2007 (EDT)		:''A study by Mathematica Policy Research, funded by President Bill Clinton's administration, of four abstinence education programs funded under Title V Section 510 "had no effect on the sexual abstinence of youth."<ref>Mathematica Policy Research: Impacts of Four Abstinence Education Programs[http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/abstinencereport.asp]</ref> The authors point out that "Most Title V, Section 510 abstinence education programs are implemented in upper elementary and middle schools and most are completed before youth enter high school", and note that "the findings provide no information on the effects programs might have if they were implemented in high school or began at earlier ages but continued through high school." The Family Research Council added that "one logical conclusion is that to achieve the greatest effectiveness, programs must be intensive and long-term, so that the knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to reject sex before marriage are constantly reinforced--particularly in the pivotal high school years."<ref>Family Research Council: Mathematica Study Doesn't Add Up to the End of Abstinence[http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=WU07D09]</ref>--[[User:Hsmom\|Hsmom]] 08:09, 18 September 2007 (EDT)
	''		''
		+	==Concerns about Use of Necklace Image==
		+	I am concerned that using the image of the necklace in this article does not meet "fair use" standards, as it is not used to illustrate an article about the necklace. See [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Beads_MFA_Boston.jpg]. It is also unclear how the image and the article are related. The image belongs to the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. I am far from an expert on copyright issues or the image in question; I just wanted to bring the question to the attention of others who are more qualified to make an appropriate decision regarding the use of the image.--[[User:Hsmom\|Hsmom]] 22:25, 18 September 2007 (EDT)