Q Document - Revision history

Learn together: Category, as discussed in talk

2008-10-04T06:58:48Z

Category, as discussed in talk

Learn together: Some additions; see Talk

2008-10-04T06:56:13Z

Some additions; see Talk

Philip J. Rayment: copyedit

2008-10-04T05:20:45Z

copyedit

Foxtrot: wikify

2008-10-04T05:16:23Z

wikify

Philip J. Rayment: Change cat.

2008-10-04T04:36:56Z

Change cat.

NathanG at 19:23, March 28, 2008

2008-03-28T19:23:06Z

BrianCo: categorized

2007-08-01T21:08:21Z

categorized

Teresita at 02:26, April 5, 2007

2007-04-05T02:26:45Z

Boethius: brief outline

2007-03-15T00:34:46Z

brief outline

New page

The Q document, named from the German Quelle, "source", is a hypothetical lost textual source for the Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of Luke.
Biblical scholars have long realized that that Matthew and Luke share much material not found in the Gospel of Mark, and postulated a second common source, which was named the Q document. Some non-canonical gospels, such as the [[Gospel of Thomas]], also are believed to draw from Q.

Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via oral traditions, or some variety of since-lost texts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:58, October 4, 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	[[Category:Biblical Documents]]		[[Category:Biblical Documents]]
		+	[[Category:New Testament]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The '''Q document''', named from the [[German]] word "Quelle", which means "source", is a hypothetical lost textual source for the [[Gospel of Matthew]] and the [[Gospel of Luke]]. Biblical scholars have long realized that that Matthew and Luke share much material not found in the [[Gospel of Mark]], and postulated a second common source, which was named the Q document, containing the sayings of Jesus but no account of his early life.  Some non-canonical gospels, such as the [[Gospel of Thomas]], also are believed to draw from Q.
+The '''Q document''', named from the [[German]] word "Quelle", which means "source", is a hypothetical lost textual source for the [[Gospel of Matthew]] and the [[Gospel of Luke]]. Biblical scholars have long realized that that Matthew and Luke share much material not found in the [[Gospel of Mark]], and postulated a second common source, which was named the Q document, containing the sayings of [[Jesus]] but no account of his early life.  Some non-canonical writings, such as the [[Gospel of Thomas]], also are believed to draw from Q.
-Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document is only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via [[oral tradition]]s, or some variety of since-lost texts.  Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.
+Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document is only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts nor is a Q document referred to in the [[Bible]].  It is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via [[oral tradition]]s, some variety of since-lost texts, or if the Gospels of Matthew or Luke used the other as a source.  Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.
 [[Category:Biblical Documents]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 The '''Q document''', named from the [[German]] word "Quelle", which means "source", is a hypothetical lost textual source for the [[Gospel of Matthew]] and the [[Gospel of Luke]]. Biblical scholars have long realized that that Matthew and Luke share much material not found in the [[Gospel of Mark]], and postulated a second common source, which was named the Q document, containing the sayings of Jesus but no account of his early life.  Some non-canonical gospels, such as the [[Gospel of Thomas]], also are believed to draw from Q.
-Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via [[oral tradition]]s, or some variety of since-lost texts.  Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.
+Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document is only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via [[oral tradition]]s, or some variety of since-lost texts.  Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.
 [[Category:Biblical Documents]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The '''Q document''', named from the German Quelle, "source", is a hypothetical lost textual source for the Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of Luke. Biblical scholars have long realized that that Matthew and Luke share much material not found in the Gospel of Mark, and postulated a second common source, which was named the Q document, containing the sayings of Jesus but no account of his early life.  Some non-canonical gospels, such as the [[Gospel of Thomas]], also are believed to draw from Q.
+The '''Q document''', named from the [[German]] word "Quelle", which means "source", is a hypothetical lost textual source for the [[Gospel of Matthew]] and the [[Gospel of Luke]]. Biblical scholars have long realized that that Matthew and Luke share much material not found in the [[Gospel of Mark]], and postulated a second common source, which was named the Q document, containing the sayings of Jesus but no account of his early life.  Some non-canonical gospels, such as the [[Gospel of Thomas]], also are believed to draw from Q.
-Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via oral traditions, or some variety of since-lost texts.  Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.
+Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via [[oral tradition]]s, or some variety of since-lost texts.  Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.
 [[Category:Biblical Documents]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:36, October 4, 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via oral traditions, or some variety of since-lost texts. Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.		Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via oral traditions, or some variety of since-lost texts. Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.

−	[[Category:~~Bible~~]]	+	[[Category:Biblical Documents]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, August 1, 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via oral traditions, or some variety of since-lost texts. Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.		Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via oral traditions, or some variety of since-lost texts. Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.
		+
		+	[[Category:Biblical texts]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, April 5, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The Q document, named from the German Quelle, "source", is a hypothetical lost textual source for the Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of Luke.	+	The Q document, named from the German Quelle, "source", is a hypothetical lost textual source for the Gospel of Matthew and Gospel of Luke. Biblical scholars have long realized that that Matthew and Luke share much material not found in the Gospel of Mark, and postulated a second common source, which was named the Q document, containing the sayings of Jesus but no account of his early life. Some non-canonical gospels, such as the [[Gospel of Thomas]], also are believed to draw from Q.
−	Biblical scholars have long realized that that Matthew and Luke share much material not found in the Gospel of Mark, and postulated a second common source, which was named the Q document. Some non-canonical gospels, such as the [[Gospel of Thomas]], also are believed to draw from Q.

−	Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via oral traditions, or some variety of since-lost texts.	+	Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the Q document only a hypothesis; there are no surviving manuscripts, and it is entirely possible that the same elements could be accounted for via oral traditions, or some variety of since-lost texts. Some religious historians believe that Q can be reconstructed by analyzing those passages Matthew and Luke have in common.