Ivermectin litigation - Revision history

Aschlafly at 04:56, September 27, 2022

2022-09-27T04:56:43Z

Aschlafly: another example

2022-09-27T04:56:23Z

another example

Aschlafly: additional examples

2022-09-25T17:35:31Z

additional examples

Aschlafly: The FDA is prohibited by law from attempting to practice medicine, and typically does not approve medication for specific uses after such medications are initially approved as safe for any use.

2022-09-25T04:50:28Z

The FDA is prohibited by law from attempting to practice medicine, and typically does not approve medication for specific uses after such medications are initially approved as safe for any use.

Aschlafly: Eight of the 26 cases -- totaling 30% -- mistakenly relied on the FDA's unjustified hostility to this safe, often-effective medication

2022-09-25T04:49:01Z

Eight of the 26 cases -- totaling 30% -- mistakenly relied on the FDA's unjustified hostility to this safe, often-effective medication

Aschlafly: In ''Frey'', the Michigan appellate court expressly relied on the FDA's website posting that wrongly disparages ivermectin.

2022-09-25T04:41:31Z

In ''Frey'', the Michigan appellate court expressly relied on the FDA's website posting that wrongly disparages ivermectin.

Aschlafly at 04:36, September 25, 2022

2022-09-25T04:36:51Z

Aschlafly: improved

2022-09-25T04:36:36Z

improved

Aschlafly: a start

2022-09-25T04:33:01Z

a start

New page

'''Ivermectin litigation''' in the context of [[Covid-19]] consists of only 11 federal and 15 state court decisions, some of which involve efforts to block hospital interference with administration of [[ivermectin]] to treat Covid-19 patients.
[[category:coronavirus]]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Additional examples include:
-*''Gahl v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.'', 977 N.W.2d 756, 782 (Wis. Ct. App. 2022) ("Throughout the October 12 hearing, the circuit court repeatedly questioned the parties to elicit additional information and greater detail. For example, the circuit court asked questions regarding the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) position regarding ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.")
+*''Gahl v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.'', 977 N.W.2d 756, 782 (Wis. Ct. App. 2022) ("Throughout the October 12 hearing, the circuit court repeatedly questioned the parties to elicit additional information and greater detail. For example, the circuit court asked questions regarding the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) position regarding ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.").
 *''Tex. Health Huguley, Inc. v. Jones'', 637 S.W.3d 202, 209 n.12 (Tex. App. 2021) ("The doctor explained that he had not prescribed Ivermectin while treating Mr. Jones's COVID-19 because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had issued a warning that the drug should not be used for COVID-19 treatment, and because, likely for the same reason, the drug was not part of Huguley's COVID-19 protocol.").

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Additional examples include:
-*''Gahl v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.'', 977 N.W.2d 756, 782 (Wis. Ct. App. 2022) ("Throughout the October 12 hearing, the circuit court repeatedly questioned the parties to elicit additional information and greater detail. For example, the circuit court asked questions regarding the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) position regarding ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment."
+*''Gahl v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.'', 977 N.W.2d 756, 782 (Wis. Ct. App. 2022) ("Throughout the October 12 hearing, the circuit court repeatedly questioned the parties to elicit additional information and greater detail. For example, the circuit court asked questions regarding the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) position regarding ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.")
 == References ==
 {{reflist}}
 [[category:coronavirus]]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 In ''Frey'', the [[Michigan]] appellate court expressly relied on the [[FDA]]'s website posting that wrongly disparages ivermectin.<ref>https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19</ref>
 == References ==
 {{reflist}}
 [[category:coronavirus]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Ivermectin litigation''' in the context of [[Covid-19]] consists of only 11 federal and 15 state court decisions (as of September 25, 2022), some of which involve efforts to block hospital interference with administration of [[ivermectin]] to treat Covid-19 patients.
-Many of decisions involved courts siding with hospitals that refused to allow ivermectin for Covid-19 patients.  Eight of the 26 cases -- totaling 30% -- mistakenly relied on the [[FDA]]'s unjustified hostility to this safe, often-effective medication.  Typical was this ruling by a [[Michigan]] appellate court:
+Many of decisions involved courts siding with hospitals that refused to allow ivermectin for Covid-19 patients.  Eight of the 26 cases -- totaling 30% -- mistakenly relied on the [[FDA]]'s unjustified hostility to this safe, often-effective medication.  The FDA is prohibited by law from attempting to practice medicine, and typically does not approve medication for specific uses after such medications are initially approved as safe for any use.
 {{cquote|Ivermectin is an anti-parasite medication commonly used to treat parasitic diseases in humans and animals and some skin conditions such as rosacea. Although a number of physicians across the country have prescribed ivermectin to treat COVID-19, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved ivermectin for use in treating COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends against its use to treat COVID-19, and defendants' internal policy does not permit the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.}}
 ''Frey v. Trinity Health-Michigan'', No. 359446, 2021 Mich. App. LEXIS 6988, at *2 (Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2021) (footnotes omitted).

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Ivermectin litigation''' in the context of [[Covid-19]] consists of only 11 federal and 15 state court decisions (as of September 25, 2022), some of which involve efforts to block hospital interference with administration of [[ivermectin]] to treat Covid-19 patients.
-Many of decisions involved courts siding with hospitals that refused to allow ivermectin for Covid-19 patients.  Some mistakenly relied on the [[FDA]]'s unjustified hostility to this safe, often-effective medication:
+Many of decisions involved courts siding with hospitals that refused to allow ivermectin for Covid-19 patients.  Eight of the 26 cases -- totaling 30% -- mistakenly relied on the [[FDA]]'s unjustified hostility to this safe, often-effective medication.  Typical was this ruling by a [[Michigan]] appellate court:
 {{cquote|Ivermectin is an anti-parasite medication commonly used to treat parasitic diseases in humans and animals and some skin conditions such as rosacea. Although a number of physicians across the country have prescribed ivermectin to treat COVID-19, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved ivermectin for use in treating COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends against its use to treat COVID-19, and defendants' internal policy does not permit the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.}}
 ''Frey v. Trinity Health-Michigan'', No. 359446, 2021 Mich. App. LEXIS 6988, at *2 (Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2021) (footnotes omitted).

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:36, September 25, 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Ivermectin litigation''' in the context of [[Covid-19]] consists of only 11 federal and 15 state court decisions, some of which involve efforts to block hospital interference with administration of [[ivermectin]] to treat Covid-19 patients.	+	'''Ivermectin litigation''' in the context of [[Covid-19]] consists of only 11 federal and 15 state court decisions (as of September 25, 2022), some of which involve efforts to block hospital interference with administration of [[ivermectin]] to treat Covid-19 patients.
		+
		+	Many of decisions involved courts siding with hospitals that refused to allow ivermectin for Covid-19 patients. Some mistakenly relied on the [[FDA]]'s unjustified hostility to this safe, often-effective medication:
		+	{{cquote\|Ivermectin is an anti-parasite medication commonly used to treat parasitic diseases in humans and animals3 and some skin conditions such as rosacea. Although a number of physicians across the country have prescribed ivermectin to treat COVID-19, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved ivermectin for use in treating COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends against its use to treat COVID-19, and defendants' internal policy does not permit the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.}}
		+	''Frey v. Trinity Health-Michigan'', No. 359446, 2021 Mich. App. LEXIS 6988, at *2 (Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2021) (footnotes omitted).
	[[category:coronavirus]]		[[category:coronavirus]]