File talk:ScriptAmesLogo.jpg - Revision history

TK at 05:27, March 24, 2007

2007-03-24T05:27:05Z

2007-03-24T05:10:50Z

2007-03-24T05:09:52Z

2007-03-24T05:08:36Z

2007-03-24T05:05:01Z

2007-03-24T05:04:41Z

2007-03-24T04:56:29Z

2007-03-24T04:54:05Z

New page: Again, I release all etc etc. -~~~~

New page

Again, I release all etc etc. -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 00:54, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, March 24, 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I like this one more. [[User:MountainDew\|MountainDew]] 01:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)		I like this one more. [[User:MountainDew\|MountainDew]] 01:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	*I have no idea what this one is, but the more modern typeface, juxtaposed with the script of the Constitution, is the one I like. --~ [[User:TK\|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK\|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 01:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, March 24, 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Shoot! Sorry BenjaminS, I heard "bold & fancy" from everyone else. I've put them both up, so you guys can decide together. I personally like this one a little better... don't know why. It might be less formal, is my one worry.-[[User:AmesG\|AmesG]] 01:08, 24 March 2007 (EDT)		Shoot! Sorry BenjaminS, I heard "bold & fancy" from everyone else. I've put them both up, so you guys can decide together. I personally like this one a little better... don't know why. It might be less formal, is my one worry.-[[User:AmesG\|AmesG]] 01:08, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	I like this one more. [[User:MountainDew\|MountainDew]] 01:10, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, March 24, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	:: '''''debate on how to modify this logo [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#New_Script-Constitution_Logo\| here], to keep it all in one place'''''
		+
	Again, I release all etc etc. -[[User:AmesG\|AmesG]] 00:54, 24 March 2007 (EDT)		Again, I release all etc etc. -[[User:AmesG\|AmesG]] 00:54, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:08, March 24, 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Isn't the position of the text too low? Wouldn't it be better in the middle?		:Isn't the position of the text too low? Wouldn't it be better in the middle?
		+
		+	Shoot! Sorry BenjaminS, I heard "bold & fancy" from everyone else. I've put them both up, so you guys can decide together. I personally like this one a little better... don't know why. It might be less formal, is my one worry.-[[User:AmesG\|AmesG]] 01:08, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:05, March 24, 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I hate to be picky, but i think it's too bold and too fancy. In fact, I think the first one was just about perfect. --[[User:BenjaminS\|BenjaminS]] 00:56, 24 March 2007 (EDT)		I hate to be picky, but i think it's too bold and too fancy. In fact, I think the first one was just about perfect. --[[User:BenjaminS\|BenjaminS]] 00:56, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

−	:Isn't the position of the text too low?	+	:Isn't the position of the text too low? Wouldn't it be better in the middle?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, March 24, 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I hate to be picky, but i think it's too bold and too fancy. In fact, I think the first one was just about perfect. --[[User:BenjaminS\|BenjaminS]] 00:56, 24 March 2007 (EDT)		I hate to be picky, but i think it's too bold and too fancy. In fact, I think the first one was just about perfect. --[[User:BenjaminS\|BenjaminS]] 00:56, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	:Isn't the position of the text too low?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, March 24, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Again, I release all etc etc. -[[User:AmesG\|AmesG]] 00:54, 24 March 2007 (EDT)		Again, I release all etc etc. -[[User:AmesG\|AmesG]] 00:54, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	I hate to be picky, but i think it's too bold and too fancy. In fact, I think the first one was just about perfect. --[[User:BenjaminS\|BenjaminS]] 00:56, 24 March 2007 (EDT)