Creation science - Revision history

Conservative: /* Notes and References */

2024-03-04T19:52:04Z

Notes and References

Cazle: /* Creation Science and the Evolutionary Science Community */

2024-03-04T17:48:29Z

Creation Science and the Evolutionary Science Community

Conservative: /* See also */

2023-03-07T04:47:51Z

Conservative: /* Creation Science and Genetic Programs and Biological Information */

2022-12-27T21:57:08Z

Creation Science and Genetic Programs and Biological Information

Conservative at 21:50, December 27, 2022

2022-12-27T21:50:50Z

Conservative: /* See also */

2022-11-05T10:48:51Z

RobSmith: Reverted edits by NotAKiller (talk) to last revision by VargasMilan

2021-09-20T01:30:41Z

Reverted edits by NotAKiller (talk) to last revision by VargasMilan

NotAKiller at 01:15, September 20, 2021

2021-09-20T01:15:05Z

VargasMilan: /* Biblical creation publications */ + italicized creation science journals

2020-08-23T05:02:05Z

Biblical creation publications: + italicized creation science journals

VargasMilan: /* Creation Scientist Successfully Predicts Planetary Magnetic Fields */ italicized ''New Horizons'' spacecraft

2020-08-23T04:59:55Z

Creation Scientist Successfully Predicts Planetary Magnetic Fields: italicized ''New Horizons'' spacecraft

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 *[http://www.nwcreation.net/ NorthWest Creation Network]
-==Notes and References==
+== Notes ==
 {{reflist|2}}
 [[Category:Science]]
 [[Category:Creation science]]

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 Creation science is considered as pseudoscience by the majority of the scientific community. It is also commonly rejected by [[Atheism|atheists]] as they generally hold the [[worldview]] of [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]]. Liberals reject Creation Science with the spurious pretext that it cannot be disproved ([[falsifiable|falsifiability]]) and therefore cannot be considered "[[science]]".<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/19991013122341/https://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/evolutionviews990816.html</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ13.html#wp2727001</ref>
-However, Dr. [[Walt Brown]] argues that the field of creation science is scientific<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ13.html#wp2727001</ref>  and the evolutionists' objections to creation science are due to their worldviews and preconceptions, rather than on the basis of scientific evidence or the scientific validity of the idea.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp</ref>
+'''''However, Dr. [[Walt Brown]] argues that the field of creation science is scientific'''''<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ13.html#wp2727001</ref>  and the evolutionists' objections to creation science are due to their worldviews and preconceptions, rather than on the basis of scientific evidence or the scientific validity of the idea.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp</ref>
 Also, [[Karl Popper]], a leading philosopher of science and originator of falsifiability as a criterion of demarcation of science from nonscience,<ref>
 * http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 *[[Creationism]]
 *[[Revolution Against Evolution website]]
 *[[Christianity and Science]]
 *[[Theory of Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality]]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 #Gitt stated that the author of the information encoded into the DNA [[molecule]], who constructed the molecular biomachines to encode, decode and run the cells was supremely intelligent.<ref>http://www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn58/tinycode_dna.htm</ref>
 #Dr. Gitt asserted that because information is a nonmaterial entity and does not originate from matter, the author of biological information must be nonmaterial ([[spirit]]).<ref>http://www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn58/tinycode_dna.htm</ref>
-[[Image:Waltbrown.gif‎|left|thumb|200px|Dr. [[Walt Brown]]]]
 Dr. [[Walt Brown]] concurs in regards to the [[supernatural]] origin of biological information and states that the genetic material that controls the biological processes of life is coded information and that human experience tells us that [[codes]] are created only by the result of intelligence and not merely by processes of nature.<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences18.html</ref> Dr. Brown also asserts that the "information stored in the genetic material of all life is a complex program. Therefore, it appears that an unfathomable intelligence created these genetic programs."<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences18.html</ref>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[File:Images.jpg|thumbnail|375px|right|The [[Creation Research Society]] is a professional organization of trained scientists and interested laypersons committed to the scientific study of special creation as given in the book of [[Genesis]]. They publish a quarterly peer-reviewed [[Creation Research Society Quarterly Journal|creation science journal]].<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/index.html The Creation Research Society]</ref> ]]
 '''Creation science''' is branch of [[science]] which sets out to show that [[supernatural]] [[creation]] of the material [[universe]] by [[God]] is consistent and compatible with the available scientific evidence. Being in the realm of [[origins science]], creation science is a historical science.<ref>[https://creation.com/its-not-science It's not science] by [[Creation Ministries International]]</ref><ref>[http://creationrevolution.com/2011/05/naturalism-doesn%E2%80%99t-work/ Naturalism Doesn’t Work]</ref><ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee/what-is-science What is science?]</ref> Most advocates of creation science believe the [[young earth creationism|earth is about 6,000 years old]], and they publish scientific evidence supporting this view (See, for example, [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]]).  The ongoing discovery of hundreds of [[living fossils]] correlates well with creation science but finds no answer in Darwinian theory.<ref>Thomas, B. 2015. 'Living Fossils' Point to Recent Creation. Acts & Facts. [https://www.icr.org/article/8974/268]</ref> In addition, scientists in the discipline of creation science state that the [[First Law of Thermodynamics|first law of thermodynamics]] and [[second law of thermodynamics]] argue against an eternal universe.  They also claim that these laws point to the universe being created by [[God]].<ref>[http://godevidences.net/space/lawsofscience.php Evidences for God From Space&mdash;Laws of Science]</ref><ref>Thompson, Bert, [http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2329 So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!], 2001 (Apologetics Press)</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html</ref> Creation scientists also assert that naturalistic processes alone cannot account for the [[origin of life]] and that the [[Evolution|theory of evolution]] cannot account for the various kinds of animals and plants. Both evolutionary scientists and [[Young earth creationism|young earth creation]] scientists believe that [[speciation]] occurs; however, young earth creation scientists state that speciation generally occurs at a much faster rate than evolutionists believe is the case.<ref>[[Creation Ministries International]], [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3036/ Speciation: Questions and Answers]</ref>
 [[Creation Ministries International]], a leading [[Bible|biblical]] [[creation]] science organization, declared:
 {{cquote|Creationist research is having a global effect that is worrying the [[atheism|atheists]] and secularists of this world. They have had it all their own way for over a century but things are slowly changing. For almost twenty five years now, ''Journal of Creation'' has been publishing cutting-edge creationist research that has been fueling the war against [[evolution]], creating little fires all around the world, including [[Great Britain]].

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 *[[Creation]]
 *[[Creationism]]
 *[[Essay: Sharing your Christian/creationist videos on the internet]]
 *[[Christianity and Science]]

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 Some prominent biblical [[creation]] publications are given below:
-*[[Creation magazine]]
+*''[[Creation magazine]]''
-*[[Journal of Creation]] - Peer reviewed
+*''[[Journal of Creation]]'' - Peer reviewed
-*[[Creation Research Society Quarterly Journal]] - peer reviewed
+*''[[Creation Research Society Quarterly Journal]]'' - peer reviewed
 ==Creation Science and the Evolutionary Science Community==

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 Dr. Donn Chapman invited Dr. Humphreys on the Origins TV series presenting his theory.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7manZ1WF-Lc&list=PLT8IFvbAQauhBny_7LoWat_ZrjXx159Y7&index=26 Magnetic Fields, part 1 of 2 with Dr. D. Russell Humphreys - Origins]</ref><ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amDk5rgoThA&list=PLT8IFvbAQauhBny_7LoWat_ZrjXx159Y7&index=47 Magnetic Fields, part 2 of 2 with Dr. D. Russell Humphreys - Origins]</ref>
-Other recent successful predictions were that Pluto would show active geology, it's atmospheric escape rate would be too great for millions of years, and that Pluto's moons would not yield evidence for being formed from collision.<ref>"Will Pluto Surprise Scientists?" by David F. Coppedge, ''Creation Evolution Headlines,''July 9, 2015 [https://crev.info/2015/07/will-pluto-surprise-scientists/]</ref>  This was confirmed by the New Horizons flyby.<ref>"“Overdose of Awesomeness”: New Pluto Images Show Unpredicted Activity", by David Coppedge, Creation Matters 2015 Vol. 20, Num. 5 [https://www.creationresearch.org/index.php/extensions/s5-creation-matters/cm-archive/creation-matters-2010-to-2019]</ref>
+Other recent successful predictions were that Pluto would show active geology, it's atmospheric escape rate would be too great for millions of years, and that Pluto's moons would not yield evidence for being formed from collision.<ref>"Will Pluto Surprise Scientists?" by David F. Coppedge, ''Creation Evolution Headlines,'' July 9, 2015 [https://crev.info/2015/07/will-pluto-surprise-scientists/]</ref>  This was confirmed by the ''New Horizons'' flyby.<ref>"“Overdose of Awesomeness”: New Pluto Images Show Unpredicted Activity", by David Coppedge, Creation Matters 2015 Vol. 20, Num. 5 [https://www.creationresearch.org/index.php/extensions/s5-creation-matters/cm-archive/creation-matters-2010-to-2019]</ref>
 == Effect of the growth of creation science and Christian apologetics ==