Community Portal/Archive 1 - Revision history

DavidB4-bot: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.latimes.com → https://www.latimes.com, http://www.nationalreview.com → https://www.nationalreview.com (2), http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com (7), http://blogs.wsj.com → https://blogs.wsj.co...

2019-04-10T11:30:26Z

HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.latimes.com → https://www.latimes.com, http://www.nationalreview.com → https://www.nationalreview.com (2), http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com (7), http://blogs.wsj.com → https://blogs.wsj.co...

Show changes

DavidB4-bot: HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.redstate.com → https://www.redstate.com (2), http://www.telegraph.co.uk → https://www.telegraph.co.uk, http://www.theblaze.com → https://www.theblaze.com, http://www.dailymail.co.uk → https://www.dailymail.c...

2019-04-02T06:40:32Z

HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.redstate.com → https://www.redstate.com (2), http://www.telegraph.co.uk → https://www.telegraph.co.uk, http://www.theblaze.com → https://www.theblaze.com, http://www.dailymail.co.uk → https://www.dailymail.c...

DavidB4-bot: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://www.washingtonpost.com → https://www.washingtonpost.com (2), http://www.breitbart.com → https://www.breitbart.com, http://www.nytimes.com → https://www.nytimes.com, http://www.wsj.com → https://www.wsj.com...

2018-09-27T01:48:13Z

HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://www.washingtonpost.com → https://www.washingtonpost.com (2), http://www.breitbart.com → https://www.breitbart.com, http://www.nytimes.com → https://www.nytimes.com, http://www.wsj.com → https://www.wsj.com...

Show changes

DavidB4-bot: HTTPS/HTTP

2018-09-10T01:23:16Z

HTTPS/HTTP

DavidB4-bot: HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com (7)

2018-09-09T05:27:31Z

HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com (7)

Conservative: Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by SamHB

2016-05-27T05:45:49Z

Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by SamHB

Conservative: Reverted edits by SamHB (talk) to last revision by Conservative

2016-05-27T05:40:42Z

Reverted edits by SamHB (talk) to last revision by Conservative

SamHB: Now that things have been put in proper chronological order (right?) my reply. Conservapedia does not censor.

2016-05-27T04:33:19Z

Now that things have been put in proper chronological order (right?) my reply. Conservapedia does not censor.

Conservative at 04:15, May 27, 2016

2016-05-27T04:15:18Z

SamHB: /* The family-friendly nature of this site is being willfully undermined */ replies

2016-05-27T04:13:51Z

The family-friendly nature of this site is being willfully undermined: replies

@@ Line 1,414: / Line 1,414: @@
 == We've gotta get this picture ==
-Shirtless, horseriding Putin vs bicycle ridding Obama: [http://www.redstate.com/uploads/2015/09/01-007d-620x506.jpg]
+Shirtless, horseriding Putin vs bicycle ridding Obama: [https://www.redstate.com/uploads/2015/09/01-007d-620x506.jpg]
 :Putin agrees with Western conservatives are some issues (homosexuality, etc.), but he is an autocrat (a popular one in Russia) who disagrees with much of the freedoms in the Bill of Rights and political freedom principles in other Western democracies. He also lies and he previously worked for the KGB.
@@ Line 1,446: / Line 1,446: @@
 Who came up with the "spontaneous reaction to a video" story?  ''Was it the same person or persons who decided to stick to that explanation and have UN ambassador Susan Rice repeat the same lie on national television and six times in the president’s speech at the United Nations–even, most chillingly of all, have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeat it to Tyrone Woods’ parents over the coffin of their dead son at Andrews Air Force Base, saying she would “make sure the person who made the film is arrested.”''[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/13/three-key-questions-on-benghazi-scandal.html] Judging from the "clock boy" story, Obama likes nothing better than a good Islamist hoax. Someone appearently concocted the video story well in advance. Was the administration so attached to this story that they sacrificed an ambassador so they could have the opportunity to use it? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:25, 24 October 2015 (EDT)
-:It seems that Hillary reversed herself at the recent hearing and testified that she never blamed the attack on the notorious "Innocence of Muslims" video.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/11951682/Hillary-Clintons-big-Benghazi-lie.html] Good grief! How does this woman keep up with her own lies? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:13, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
+:It seems that Hillary reversed herself at the recent hearing and testified that she never blamed the attack on the notorious "Innocence of Muslims" video.[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/11951682/Hillary-Clintons-big-Benghazi-lie.html] Good grief! How does this woman keep up with her own lies? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:13, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
 ::Are you sure?  Why would she deny blaming the attack on the video when she is recorded doing so at a public event?  I read that not only did she blame the video, but that the origin of that story was traced back to Hillary Clinton.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 07:54, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
 :::“I said ''some'' have sought to justify the attack because of the video. I used those words deliberately, not to ascribe a motive to every attacker but as a warning to those across the region that there was no justification for further attacks." ([http://featuredyoutube.com/clinton-claims-she-didnt-blame-benghazi-attack-on-a-youtube-video/ video] and [https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/hillarys_worst_crime_was_against_the_filmmaker.html write up]) This is such a Clintonian answer, a gem of the genre. Some people said some things, and those things may or may not have been partially true. But as for Hillary, she was just commenting on the remarkable things these other people were saying and doing. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 16:59, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
@@ Line 1,526: / Line 1,526: @@
 == Trump and his protesters ==
-[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/10/the-silently-protesting-muslim-woman-at-the-trump-rally-wasn-t-alone.html This article] takes a look at a group of professional protesters that go to Trump rallies to try to shut them down. Apparently, Trump said something or other about Muslims that made these people upset. In other words, the protests are an attempt to impose religious censorship. Or at least this article, obviously written by a sympathetic journalist, doesn't argue that they are about anything more noble than that. The protesters have the nerve to compare themselves to Rosa Parks. Uh, excuse me, but wasn't Parks protesting segregation rather than free speech? There are many Muslim countries in the world where criticism of Islam is banned. If your delicate ears cannot withstand such criticism, may I suggest moving to one of them? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:06, 11 January 2016 (EST)
+[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/10/the-silently-protesting-muslim-woman-at-the-trump-rally-wasn-t-alone.html This article] takes a look at a group of professional protesters that go to Trump rallies to try to shut them down. Apparently, Trump said something or other about Muslims that made these people upset. In other words, the protests are an attempt to impose religious censorship. Or at least this article, obviously written by a sympathetic journalist, doesn't argue that they are about anything more noble than that. The protesters have the nerve to compare themselves to Rosa Parks. Uh, excuse me, but wasn't Parks protesting segregation rather than free speech? There are many Muslim countries in the world where criticism of Islam is banned. If your delicate ears cannot withstand such criticism, may I suggest moving to one of them? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:06, 11 January 2016 (EST)
 *I see that the protester scum are being hailed by John Kasich[https://www.newsmax.com/Politics/kasich-trump-muslim-protester/2016/01/09/id/708858/] as well by the Huma-affiliated CAIR.[http://bsccomment.com/2016/01/11/cair-urges-trump-to-apologise-to-muslim-protester-ejected.html] Kasich is a literal sellout. He was a conservative governor of Ohio, but then he took the money of Clinton pal Ron Burkle to run as a liberal Republican.[http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-ron-burkle-clintons-20160107-story.html] In other words, he is this year’s Jon Huntsman. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:49, 12 January 2016 (EST)
@@ Line 1,538: / Line 1,538: @@
 == Donald Trump as the next president of the United States ==
-I realize that Wall Street and the Democratic Party favor Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders and there is a lot of corruption in the Obama administration, but Hillary may be indicted in about 60 days according to a former federal prosecutor.[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/07/former-federal-prosecutor-predicts-hillary-clinton-may-be-indicted-in-next-60-days-heres-why/] If justice proves to be ultimately impartial, then Hillary could be indicted and convicted just like General Petraeus was over his email security breeches.
+I realize that Wall Street and the Democratic Party favor Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders and there is a lot of corruption in the Obama administration, but Hillary may be indicted in about 60 days according to a former federal prosecutor.[https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/07/former-federal-prosecutor-predicts-hillary-clinton-may-be-indicted-in-next-60-days-heres-why/] If justice proves to be ultimately impartial, then Hillary could be indicted and convicted just like General Petraeus was over his email security breeches.
 It does appear as if the FBI will have a large body of evidence against Hillary in relation to her email scandal and possibly the corruption related to the Clinton Foundation.  I don't know if Obama wants to jeopardize how historians view his presidency by letting Hillary off the hook.
@@ Line 1,625: / Line 1,625: @@
 == What happens if Hillary is indicted? ==
-Answer: She can keep running for president. The Dems won't mind a bit! The trail is being blazed by Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Democratic and indicted attorney general. In the latest poll, Kane is ahead of her nearest primary challenger 31-18.[http://www.redstate.com/2016/01/27/kathleen-kane-poll-democrats-pennsylvania/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:21, 27 January 2016 (EST)
+Answer: She can keep running for president. The Dems won't mind a bit! The trail is being blazed by Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Democratic and indicted attorney general. In the latest poll, Kane is ahead of her nearest primary challenger 31-18.[https://www.redstate.com/2016/01/27/kathleen-kane-poll-democrats-pennsylvania/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:21, 27 January 2016 (EST)
 :While Obama decides whether or not to indict Hillary, Hillary talks about what a "great" Supreme Court justice he would be.[http://www.inquisitr.com/2743941/obama-supreme-court/] Hey, that doesn't sound corrupt at all, does it? The only previous president appointed to the Supreme Court was Taft in 1921. That was not by Taft's immediate successor but eight years after he left office. Taft had been a solicitor general and an appeals court judge before becoming president. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 15:10, 28 January 2016 (EST)
 ::Here's a great tweet from David Frum: "Sanders closing Iowa argument: “Imagine a better world!” Clinton closing argument: “We’re highly confident no indictments are forthcoming." I take it Obama responded favorably to Hillary's Supreme Court trial balloon. All the leaks are presumably from someone in the FBI who isn't happy with this decision. Wouldn't it be great if a Republican gets sworn in and Hillary has to flee to Russia like Snowden? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:16, 31 January 2016 (EST)
@@ Line 1,761: / Line 1,761: @@
 :AugustO, I know you are from Germany. Conservapedia's "[[Bestiality and Germany]]" article ranks #2 at a popular search engine (which begins with a G) for this particular search term. And the article has nearly 8,000 page views.
-:On July 1, 2013 the ''Daily Mail'' reported that bestiality brothels were spreading quickly through Germany. In addition, there were "even 'erotic zoos' which people can visit to abuse animals ranging from llamas to goats."[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2352779/Bestiality-brothels-spreading-Germany-campaigner-claims-abusers-sex-animals-lifestyle-choice.html]
+:On July 1, 2013 the ''Daily Mail'' reported that bestiality brothels were spreading quickly through Germany. In addition, there were "even 'erotic zoos' which people can visit to abuse animals ranging from llamas to goats."[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2352779/Bestiality-brothels-spreading-Germany-campaigner-claims-abusers-sex-animals-lifestyle-choice.html]
 :In recent years, several countries with high rates of Darwinism/atheism have experienced problems relating to bestiality (see: [[Bestiality and various geographic areas|Geographic areas where bestiality is posing a notable problem]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[evolutionary belief and bestiality]]).

@@ Line 1,258: / Line 1,258: @@
 :After Thomas Jefferson got elected, on March 4, 1805, he proposed amending the Constitution to allow the federal government to place any surplus revenue it collected in an annual fund to "be applied ''in time of peace'' to rivers, canals, roads, arts, manufactures, education, and other great objects within each State."  He repeated this proposal on December 2, 1806.  Jefferson's proposals as President did not bear out his earlier stated philosophy of minimal government.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 07:48, 16 August 2015 (EDT)
 ::I think you are misinterpreting this proposal. If no action was taken, any surplus would have been deposited into the Bank of the United States and made available for loans. Jefferson was still opposed to the bank at this time. [http://files.libertyfund.org/pll/quotes/38.html Here] is some context for the quote. It's all boasting about how he made the federal government smaller, less intrusive, and sounder financially. Of course, it's true that Jefferson was a man of many contradictions. After the federal government defaulted in November 1814 (a major event in American history that Obama claims never happened), Jefferson turned around on a lot of things. In fact, he basically adopted the Federalist agenda that he had spend so many years condemning. As President Madison (1809-1817) and other top [[Republicans (Jeffersonian) | Republicans]] were his followers, Jefferson ran the country for quite some time after he officially retired in 1809. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 14:23, 16 August 2015 (EDT)
-::''[https://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/08/potentially-game-changing-oil-reserves-discovered-in-israel/ National Review]'' has an article on this subject. Pull quote: "Don’t find yourself in the position, ten years from now, of having to say, 'First they came for Andrew Jackson, and I did not speak out, because I didn’t like him.'" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:55, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
+::''[http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/08/potentially-game-changing-oil-reserves-discovered-in-israel/ National Review]'' has an article on this subject. Pull quote: "Don’t find yourself in the position, ten years from now, of having to say, 'First they came for Andrew Jackson, and I did not speak out, because I didn’t like him.'" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:55, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
 == Is this a satire site? ==
@@ Line 1,396: / Line 1,396: @@
 == Oil under the Golan Heights? ==
-This could be huge.[http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/165503#.VhnPVI2hMQ0][https://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/08/potentially-game-changing-oil-reserves-discovered-in-israel/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:00, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
+This could be huge.[http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/165503#.VhnPVI2hMQ0][http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/08/potentially-game-changing-oil-reserves-discovered-in-israel/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:00, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
 == The left is taking a political beating. If only atheists didn't so closely ally themselves with the left!!!! ==
@@ Line 1,443: / Line 1,443: @@
 == Benghazi ==
-After all the investigation, the basic questions about Benghazi are still unanswered.[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/10/22/benghazi-my-questions-for-hillary-clinton.html] Why was the ambassador at this notoriously insecure facility on the anniversary on 9/11, when an anniversary attack was widely expected? The attack went on for seven hours, and the White House was warned the attack was imminent a hour in advance. So much time to respond, but no military response. The attack used heavy weapons, so it was immediately obvious that it was planned by a terrorist group in advance.
+After all the investigation, the basic questions about Benghazi are still unanswered.[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/10/22/benghazi-my-questions-for-hillary-clinton.html] Why was the ambassador at this notoriously insecure facility on the anniversary on 9/11, when an anniversary attack was widely expected? The attack went on for seven hours, and the White House was warned the attack was imminent a hour in advance. So much time to respond, but no military response. The attack used heavy weapons, so it was immediately obvious that it was planned by a terrorist group in advance.
-Who came up with the "spontaneous reaction to a video" story?  ''Was it the same person or persons who decided to stick to that explanation and have UN ambassador Susan Rice repeat the same lie on national television and six times in the president’s speech at the United Nations–even, most chillingly of all, have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeat it to Tyrone Woods’ parents over the coffin of their dead son at Andrews Air Force Base, saying she would “make sure the person who made the film is arrested.”''[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/13/three-key-questions-on-benghazi-scandal.html] Judging from the "clock boy" story, Obama likes nothing better than a good Islamist hoax. Someone appearently concocted the video story well in advance. Was the administration so attached to this story that they sacrificed an ambassador so they could have the opportunity to use it? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:25, 24 October 2015 (EDT)
+Who came up with the "spontaneous reaction to a video" story?  ''Was it the same person or persons who decided to stick to that explanation and have UN ambassador Susan Rice repeat the same lie on national television and six times in the president’s speech at the United Nations–even, most chillingly of all, have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeat it to Tyrone Woods’ parents over the coffin of their dead son at Andrews Air Force Base, saying she would “make sure the person who made the film is arrested.”''[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/13/three-key-questions-on-benghazi-scandal.html] Judging from the "clock boy" story, Obama likes nothing better than a good Islamist hoax. Someone appearently concocted the video story well in advance. Was the administration so attached to this story that they sacrificed an ambassador so they could have the opportunity to use it? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:25, 24 October 2015 (EDT)
 :It seems that Hillary reversed herself at the recent hearing and testified that she never blamed the attack on the notorious "Innocence of Muslims" video.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/11951682/Hillary-Clintons-big-Benghazi-lie.html] Good grief! How does this woman keep up with her own lies? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:13, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
 ::Are you sure?  Why would she deny blaming the attack on the video when she is recorded doing so at a public event?  I read that not only did she blame the video, but that the origin of that story was traced back to Hillary Clinton.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 07:54, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
 :::“I said ''some'' have sought to justify the attack because of the video. I used those words deliberately, not to ascribe a motive to every attacker but as a warning to those across the region that there was no justification for further attacks." ([http://featuredyoutube.com/clinton-claims-she-didnt-blame-benghazi-attack-on-a-youtube-video/ video] and [http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/hillarys_worst_crime_was_against_the_filmmaker.html write up]) This is such a Clintonian answer, a gem of the genre. Some people said some things, and those things may or may not have been partially true. But as for Hillary, she was just commenting on the remarkable things these other people were saying and doing. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 16:59, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
 ::::I read she was the only reason the video was publicized as associated with the attack in the first place, so it would follow if ''some'' justified the attack after the publicization, it would be of necessity caused by her.  Nobody would "ascribe" that "motive" to ''any'' attacker if not for her actions. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 17:24, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
-:::::According to her memoirs, she came up with the idea all by her little old self, using her womanly "common sense": “[The video] was unquestionably inciting the region and triggering protests all over, so it would have been strange not to consider, as days of protests unfolded, that it might have had the same effect here, too. That's just common sense."[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/11/fact-check-what-hillary-left-out-benghazi-chapter/] Why do we need the NSA when we have Hillary's common sense? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:11, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
+:::::According to her memoirs, she came up with the idea all by her little old self, using her womanly "common sense": “[The video] was unquestionably inciting the region and triggering protests all over, so it would have been strange not to consider, as days of protests unfolded, that it might have had the same effect here, too. That's just common sense."[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/11/fact-check-what-hillary-left-out-benghazi-chapter/] Why do we need the NSA when we have Hillary's common sense? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:11, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
 :::::Lest anyone think that Benghazi lies are a victimless crime: Nakoula, the guy who uploaded the video, was indeed sent back to prison, just as Hillary promised.[http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/hillarys_worst_crime_was_against_the_filmmaker.html] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
@@ Line 1,553: / Line 1,553: @@
 == A Trump-Cruz race? ==
-The campaign buzz for the last couple of days has been that the Great Winnowing is finally in progress, and that the Republican field will soon be narrowed to Trump vs Cruz. This is of course inevitable and predictable, but also seems a little early given that no one has actually caste any votes yet. [https://soopermexican.com/2016/01/14/wsj-poll-shows-trump-losing-to-ted-cruz-as-candidates-drop-out/ This poll] shows Cruz beating Trump by 8 points in a two-man race. Of course, it is possible Trump will bring people to the polls who don't ordinarily vote. Faced with the choice of Cruz or Trump, the establishment is going with Trump.[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/gop-establishment-leaning-toward-trump-over-cruz.html] It seems that they consistently prefer the candidate who is less threatening to the Democrats. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:20, 19 January 2016 (EST)
+The campaign buzz for the last couple of days has been that the Great Winnowing is finally in progress, and that the Republican field will soon be narrowed to Trump vs Cruz. This is of course inevitable and predictable, but also seems a little early given that no one has actually caste any votes yet. [https://soopermexican.com/2016/01/14/wsj-poll-shows-trump-losing-to-ted-cruz-as-candidates-drop-out/ This poll] shows Cruz beating Trump by 8 points in a two-man race. Of course, it is possible Trump will bring people to the polls who don't ordinarily vote. Faced with the choice of Cruz or Trump, the establishment is going with Trump.[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/gop-establishment-leaning-toward-trump-over-cruz.html] It seems that they consistently prefer the candidate who is less threatening to the Democrats. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:20, 19 January 2016 (EST)
 :Trump's immigration law enforcement and border security efforts would prevent other states from turning into California, so the Democrats shouldn't feel too copacetic about that.  And Cruz may not even ''be'' in the race, which will encourage Rubio, Carson and Bush to neither drop out nor endorse Cruz.  The spread between Cruz and Trump should depend a lot on endorsements, as Andy predicted, and Palin's endorsement of Trump today certainly didn't help Cruz. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 01:29, 20 January 2016 (EST)
@@ Line 1,617: / Line 1,617: @@
 == Hillary's feminism ==
-I was skeptical of Trump's strategy of treating Bill's affairs as "fair game." But it seems to be working.[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/01/21/how-hillary-clinton-lost-her-feminist-base-and-her-credibility.html] It is biologically unnatural to expect a woman to show sisterhood to her romantic rivals. It certainly wasn't something we expected back in the 1990s. But modern feminism has apparently conditioned young women to think otherwise. In 2008, it always hurt Hillary when Bill showed up. But that wasn't because of feminism. It was because parents took one look at Bill and thought, "OMG! If Hillary is elected, Bill will be back in the White House. Then the kiddies will be asking us about all the disgusting things he was in the news for!" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 08:29, 24 January 2016 (EST)
+I was skeptical of Trump's strategy of treating Bill's affairs as "fair game." But it seems to be working.[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/01/21/how-hillary-clinton-lost-her-feminist-base-and-her-credibility.html] It is biologically unnatural to expect a woman to show sisterhood to her romantic rivals. It certainly wasn't something we expected back in the 1990s. But modern feminism has apparently conditioned young women to think otherwise. In 2008, it always hurt Hillary when Bill showed up. But that wasn't because of feminism. It was because parents took one look at Bill and thought, "OMG! If Hillary is elected, Bill will be back in the White House. Then the kiddies will be asking us about all the disgusting things he was in the news for!" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 08:29, 24 January 2016 (EST)
 == How the establishment can stage a comeback ==

@@ Line 1,258: / Line 1,258: @@
 :After Thomas Jefferson got elected, on March 4, 1805, he proposed amending the Constitution to allow the federal government to place any surplus revenue it collected in an annual fund to "be applied ''in time of peace'' to rivers, canals, roads, arts, manufactures, education, and other great objects within each State."  He repeated this proposal on December 2, 1806.  Jefferson's proposals as President did not bear out his earlier stated philosophy of minimal government.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 07:48, 16 August 2015 (EDT)
 ::I think you are misinterpreting this proposal. If no action was taken, any surplus would have been deposited into the Bank of the United States and made available for loans. Jefferson was still opposed to the bank at this time. [http://files.libertyfund.org/pll/quotes/38.html Here] is some context for the quote. It's all boasting about how he made the federal government smaller, less intrusive, and sounder financially. Of course, it's true that Jefferson was a man of many contradictions. After the federal government defaulted in November 1814 (a major event in American history that Obama claims never happened), Jefferson turned around on a lot of things. In fact, he basically adopted the Federalist agenda that he had spend so many years condemning. As President Madison (1809-1817) and other top [[Republicans (Jeffersonian) | Republicans]] were his followers, Jefferson ran the country for quite some time after he officially retired in 1809. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 14:23, 16 August 2015 (EDT)
-::''[http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/08/potentially-game-changing-oil-reserves-discovered-in-israel/ National Review]'' has an article on this subject. Pull quote: "Don’t find yourself in the position, ten years from now, of having to say, 'First they came for Andrew Jackson, and I did not speak out, because I didn’t like him.'" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:55, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
+::''[https://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/08/potentially-game-changing-oil-reserves-discovered-in-israel/ National Review]'' has an article on this subject. Pull quote: "Don’t find yourself in the position, ten years from now, of having to say, 'First they came for Andrew Jackson, and I did not speak out, because I didn’t like him.'" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:55, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
 == Is this a satire site? ==
@@ Line 1,396: / Line 1,396: @@
 == Oil under the Golan Heights? ==
-This could be huge.[http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/165503#.VhnPVI2hMQ0][http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/08/potentially-game-changing-oil-reserves-discovered-in-israel/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:00, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
+This could be huge.[http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/165503#.VhnPVI2hMQ0][https://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/08/potentially-game-changing-oil-reserves-discovered-in-israel/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:00, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
 == The left is taking a political beating. If only atheists didn't so closely ally themselves with the left!!!! ==
@@ Line 1,443: / Line 1,443: @@
 == Benghazi ==
-After all the investigation, the basic questions about Benghazi are still unanswered.[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/10/22/benghazi-my-questions-for-hillary-clinton.html] Why was the ambassador at this notoriously insecure facility on the anniversary on 9/11, when an anniversary attack was widely expected? The attack went on for seven hours, and the White House was warned the attack was imminent a hour in advance. So much time to respond, but no military response. The attack used heavy weapons, so it was immediately obvious that it was planned by a terrorist group in advance.
+After all the investigation, the basic questions about Benghazi are still unanswered.[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/10/22/benghazi-my-questions-for-hillary-clinton.html] Why was the ambassador at this notoriously insecure facility on the anniversary on 9/11, when an anniversary attack was widely expected? The attack went on for seven hours, and the White House was warned the attack was imminent a hour in advance. So much time to respond, but no military response. The attack used heavy weapons, so it was immediately obvious that it was planned by a terrorist group in advance.
-Who came up with the "spontaneous reaction to a video" story?  ''Was it the same person or persons who decided to stick to that explanation and have UN ambassador Susan Rice repeat the same lie on national television and six times in the president’s speech at the United Nations–even, most chillingly of all, have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeat it to Tyrone Woods’ parents over the coffin of their dead son at Andrews Air Force Base, saying she would “make sure the person who made the film is arrested.”''[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/13/three-key-questions-on-benghazi-scandal.html] Judging from the "clock boy" story, Obama likes nothing better than a good Islamist hoax. Someone appearently concocted the video story well in advance. Was the administration so attached to this story that they sacrificed an ambassador so they could have the opportunity to use it? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:25, 24 October 2015 (EDT)
+Who came up with the "spontaneous reaction to a video" story?  ''Was it the same person or persons who decided to stick to that explanation and have UN ambassador Susan Rice repeat the same lie on national television and six times in the president’s speech at the United Nations–even, most chillingly of all, have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton repeat it to Tyrone Woods’ parents over the coffin of their dead son at Andrews Air Force Base, saying she would “make sure the person who made the film is arrested.”''[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/13/three-key-questions-on-benghazi-scandal.html] Judging from the "clock boy" story, Obama likes nothing better than a good Islamist hoax. Someone appearently concocted the video story well in advance. Was the administration so attached to this story that they sacrificed an ambassador so they could have the opportunity to use it? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:25, 24 October 2015 (EDT)
 :It seems that Hillary reversed herself at the recent hearing and testified that she never blamed the attack on the notorious "Innocence of Muslims" video.[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/11951682/Hillary-Clintons-big-Benghazi-lie.html] Good grief! How does this woman keep up with her own lies? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:13, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
 ::Are you sure?  Why would she deny blaming the attack on the video when she is recorded doing so at a public event?  I read that not only did she blame the video, but that the origin of that story was traced back to Hillary Clinton.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 07:54, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
 :::“I said ''some'' have sought to justify the attack because of the video. I used those words deliberately, not to ascribe a motive to every attacker but as a warning to those across the region that there was no justification for further attacks." ([http://featuredyoutube.com/clinton-claims-she-didnt-blame-benghazi-attack-on-a-youtube-video/ video] and [http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/hillarys_worst_crime_was_against_the_filmmaker.html write up]) This is such a Clintonian answer, a gem of the genre. Some people said some things, and those things may or may not have been partially true. But as for Hillary, she was just commenting on the remarkable things these other people were saying and doing. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 16:59, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
 ::::I read she was the only reason the video was publicized as associated with the attack in the first place, so it would follow if ''some'' justified the attack after the publicization, it would be of necessity caused by her.  Nobody would "ascribe" that "motive" to ''any'' attacker if not for her actions. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 17:24, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
-:::::According to her memoirs, she came up with the idea all by her little old self, using her womanly "common sense": “[The video] was unquestionably inciting the region and triggering protests all over, so it would have been strange not to consider, as days of protests unfolded, that it might have had the same effect here, too. That's just common sense."[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/11/fact-check-what-hillary-left-out-benghazi-chapter/] Why do we need the NSA when we have Hillary's common sense? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:11, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
+:::::According to her memoirs, she came up with the idea all by her little old self, using her womanly "common sense": “[The video] was unquestionably inciting the region and triggering protests all over, so it would have been strange not to consider, as days of protests unfolded, that it might have had the same effect here, too. That's just common sense."[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/11/fact-check-what-hillary-left-out-benghazi-chapter/] Why do we need the NSA when we have Hillary's common sense? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:11, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
 :::::Lest anyone think that Benghazi lies are a victimless crime: Nakoula, the guy who uploaded the video, was indeed sent back to prison, just as Hillary promised.[http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/hillarys_worst_crime_was_against_the_filmmaker.html] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:08, 26 October 2015 (EDT)
@@ Line 1,553: / Line 1,553: @@
 == A Trump-Cruz race? ==
-The campaign buzz for the last couple of days has been that the Great Winnowing is finally in progress, and that the Republican field will soon be narrowed to Trump vs Cruz. This is of course inevitable and predictable, but also seems a little early given that no one has actually caste any votes yet. [https://soopermexican.com/2016/01/14/wsj-poll-shows-trump-losing-to-ted-cruz-as-candidates-drop-out/ This poll] shows Cruz beating Trump by 8 points in a two-man race. Of course, it is possible Trump will bring people to the polls who don't ordinarily vote. Faced with the choice of Cruz or Trump, the establishment is going with Trump.[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/gop-establishment-leaning-toward-trump-over-cruz.html] It seems that they consistently prefer the candidate who is less threatening to the Democrats. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:20, 19 January 2016 (EST)
+The campaign buzz for the last couple of days has been that the Great Winnowing is finally in progress, and that the Republican field will soon be narrowed to Trump vs Cruz. This is of course inevitable and predictable, but also seems a little early given that no one has actually caste any votes yet. [https://soopermexican.com/2016/01/14/wsj-poll-shows-trump-losing-to-ted-cruz-as-candidates-drop-out/ This poll] shows Cruz beating Trump by 8 points in a two-man race. Of course, it is possible Trump will bring people to the polls who don't ordinarily vote. Faced with the choice of Cruz or Trump, the establishment is going with Trump.[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/gop-establishment-leaning-toward-trump-over-cruz.html] It seems that they consistently prefer the candidate who is less threatening to the Democrats. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:20, 19 January 2016 (EST)
 :Trump's immigration law enforcement and border security efforts would prevent other states from turning into California, so the Democrats shouldn't feel too copacetic about that.  And Cruz may not even ''be'' in the race, which will encourage Rubio, Carson and Bush to neither drop out nor endorse Cruz.  The spread between Cruz and Trump should depend a lot on endorsements, as Andy predicted, and Palin's endorsement of Trump today certainly didn't help Cruz. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 01:29, 20 January 2016 (EST)
@@ Line 1,617: / Line 1,617: @@
 == Hillary's feminism ==
-I was skeptical of Trump's strategy of treating Bill's affairs as "fair game." But it seems to be working.[http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/01/21/how-hillary-clinton-lost-her-feminist-base-and-her-credibility.html] It is biologically unnatural to expect a woman to show sisterhood to her romantic rivals. It certainly wasn't something we expected back in the 1990s. But modern feminism has apparently conditioned young women to think otherwise. In 2008, it always hurt Hillary when Bill showed up. But that wasn't because of feminism. It was because parents took one look at Bill and thought, "OMG! If Hillary is elected, Bill will be back in the White House. Then the kiddies will be asking us about all the disgusting things he was in the news for!" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 08:29, 24 January 2016 (EST)
+I was skeptical of Trump's strategy of treating Bill's affairs as "fair game." But it seems to be working.[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/01/21/how-hillary-clinton-lost-her-feminist-base-and-her-credibility.html] It is biologically unnatural to expect a woman to show sisterhood to her romantic rivals. It certainly wasn't something we expected back in the 1990s. But modern feminism has apparently conditioned young women to think otherwise. In 2008, it always hurt Hillary when Bill showed up. But that wasn't because of feminism. It was because parents took one look at Bill and thought, "OMG! If Hillary is elected, Bill will be back in the White House. Then the kiddies will be asking us about all the disgusting things he was in the news for!" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 08:29, 24 January 2016 (EST)
 == How the establishment can stage a comeback ==

@@ Line 1,912: / Line 1,912: @@
 Atheists, agnostics, evolutionists and liberals, it is time to put on your sackcloth and ashes and repent of your foray into the decadent sin of bestiality! You were caught red-handed!
 Just admit it. There was a notable problem in the atheist population with bestiality and the young earth creationist community didn't have this problem despite the Amish being around animals frequently! The Amish are a tight-nit community and unlike atheists, they haven't had a notable problem with bestiality or loneliness. See also: [[Atheism and loneliness]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:31, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 :"As of today, serious journalism officially has a home on Vice: Vice News. The new web channel launched today with reports from Myanmar, Russia, Venezuela and other global hot spots." - Forbes Magazine, 3/14/2014.[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/03/04/vice-news-launches-promising-changing-of-the-guard-in-media/][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:50, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 ::I am taking a break from the internet for awhile for the most part.  The issue has been resolved.
 ::Also, there was a notable problem with bestiality in secular Europe. Some European governments passed laws in order to tamp down the problem. Hopefully, there will not be a significant problem with illegal activity in this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:30, 14 May 2016 (EDT)

@@ Line 1,912: / Line 1,912: @@
 Atheists, agnostics, evolutionists and liberals, it is time to put on your sackcloth and ashes and repent of your foray into the decadent sin of bestiality! You were caught red-handed!
 Just admit it. There was a notable problem in the atheist population with bestiality and the young earth creationist community didn't have this problem despite the Amish being around animals frequently! The Amish are a tight-nit community and unlike atheists, they haven't had a notable problem with bestiality or loneliness. See also: [[Atheism and loneliness]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:31, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 :"As of today, serious journalism officially has a home on Vice: Vice News. The new web channel launched today with reports from Myanmar, Russia, Venezuela and other global hot spots." - Forbes Magazine, 3/14/2014.[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/03/04/vice-news-launches-promising-changing-of-the-guard-in-media/][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:50, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 ::I am taking a break from the internet for awhile for the most part.  The issue has been resolved.
 ::Also, there was a notable problem with bestiality in secular Europe. Some European governments passed laws in order to tamp down the problem. Hopefully, there will not be a significant problem with illegal activity in this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:30, 14 May 2016 (EDT)

@@ Line 1,825: / Line 1,825: @@
 ::SamHB, you did an excellent job of setting up a strawman argument and then knocking it down. My apologies for not mentioning in the article that the atheists you know are not cannibals (as far as you know). Anytime you want to refute the [[Atheism and cannibalism]] article, let me know. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:06, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
 == Yet more on the repeated 500 errors ==
@@ Line 1,861: / Line 1,849: @@
 [http://community.archnet.us/conservapedia/500/2016-04-14-9.jpg April 14th, 2016 at about 9am]<br />
 Need I go on?  Just to be clear, I am not posting this just to complain, but to try to be helpful.  Have a great day! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 14:40, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
 == Please unlock ==
@@ Line 1,917: / Line 1,912: @@
 Atheists, agnostics, evolutionists and liberals, it is time to put on your sackcloth and ashes and repent of your foray into the decadent sin of bestiality! You were caught red-handed!
 Just admit it. There was a notable problem in the atheist population with bestiality and the young earth creationist community didn't have this problem despite the Amish being around animals frequently! The Amish are a tight-nit community and unlike atheists, they haven't had a notable problem with bestiality or loneliness. See also: [[Atheism and loneliness]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:31, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 :"As of today, serious journalism officially has a home on Vice: Vice News. The new web channel launched today with reports from Myanmar, Russia, Venezuela and other global hot spots." - Forbes Magazine, 3/14/2014.[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/03/04/vice-news-launches-promising-changing-of-the-guard-in-media/][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:50, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 ::I am taking a break from the internet for awhile for the most part.  The issue has been resolved.
 ::Also, there was a notable problem with bestiality in secular Europe. Some European governments passed laws in order to tamp down the problem. Hopefully, there will not be a significant problem with illegal activity in this matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:30, 14 May 2016 (EDT)