<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Climate_model</id>
	<title>Climate model - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Climate_model"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-02T23:06:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=1315088&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Conservative at 03:40, March 5, 2017</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=1315088&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2017-03-05T03:40:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 03:40, March 5, 2017&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot; &gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;A '''climate model''' is a simplified numerical simulation of the climate.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;A '''climate model''' is a simplified numerical simulation of the &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;[[&lt;/ins&gt;climate&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;]]&lt;/ins&gt;.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Climate scientists attempt to validate or prove the skill of the models by tuning them to match observations of the climate.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Climate scientists attempt to validate or prove the skill of the models by tuning them to match observations of the climate.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=264588&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ed Poor: Dr. Roy Spencer describes the negative feedback of cloud cover. Warming makes clouds dissipate, which promotes radiational cooling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=264588&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-08-11T01:04:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dr. &lt;a href=&quot;/Roy_Spencer&quot; title=&quot;Roy Spencer&quot;&gt;Roy Spencer&lt;/a&gt; describes the &lt;a href=&quot;/Negative_feedback&quot; title=&quot;Negative feedback&quot;&gt;negative feedback&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;/Cloud_cover&quot; title=&quot;Cloud cover&quot;&gt;cloud cover&lt;/a&gt;. Warming makes clouds dissipate, which promotes &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php?title=Radiational_cooling&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;Radiational cooling (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;radiational cooling&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 01:04, August 11, 2007&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot; &gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;A '''climate model''' is a simplified numerical simulation of the climate.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;A '''climate model''' is a simplified numerical simulation of the climate.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The climate is generally not considered predictable, because we cannot yet predict future solar behavior or volcanic activity and not all the internal processes of the climate are well understood. &lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Climate scientists attempt to validate or prove the skill of the models by tuning them to match observations of the climate.  Currently the most advanced climate models, still disagree by more than a factor of two in their sensitivity to greenhouse gas forcing, and have significant disagreements with observed climate behavior at high latitudes.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Climate scientists attempt to validate or prove the skill of the models by tuning them to match observations of the climate.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;All the models are claimed to have good agreement with the 20th century temperature trends, yet are acknowledged to have significant errors.  &lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Currently the most advanced climate models, still disagree by more than a factor of two in their sensitivity to greenhouse gas forcing, and have significant disagreements with observed climate behavior at high latitudes.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;They are, therefore, utterly unable to project the change of climate in response to future greenhouse gas scenarios.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;They are, therefore, utterly unable to project the change of climate in response to future greenhouse gas scenarios.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;All the &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;models are claimed &lt;/del&gt;to &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;have good agreement with &lt;/del&gt;the &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;20th century temperature trends&lt;/del&gt;, &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;yet are acknowledged &lt;/del&gt;to &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;have significant errors&lt;/del&gt;. &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt; &lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;The climate is generally not considered predictable, because not all the internal processes of the climate are well understood. &lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Dr. [[Roy Spencer]] wrote:&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;:&amp;quot;&lt;/ins&gt;All &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;leading climate models forecast that as &lt;/ins&gt;the &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;atmosphere warms there should be an increase in high altitude [[cirrus]] clouds, which would amplify any warming caused by manmade greenhouse gases. That amplification is a [[positive feedback]]. What we found in month-&lt;/ins&gt;to&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;-month fluctuations of &lt;/ins&gt;the &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;tropical climate system was a strongly [[negative feedback]]. As the [[tropical atmosphere]] warms&lt;/ins&gt;, &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;cirrus clouds decrease. That allows more infrared heat to escape from the atmosphere &lt;/ins&gt;to &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;outer space.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters&lt;/ins&gt;.&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;org/blogs/brent-baker/2007/08/09/confirming-limbaughs-prediction-cbs-ignores-study-casting-doubt-global-]&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Mathematics]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Mathematics]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Meteorology]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Meteorology]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=264587&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ed Poor: Let's cut to the chase - the models are worthless</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=264587&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-08-11T00:59:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#039;s cut to the chase - the models are worthless&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 00:59, August 11, 2007&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot; &gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;A '''climate model''' is a numerical simulation of the climate.  The &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;mathematics describing the  complex nonlinear dynamics of the &lt;/del&gt;climate &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;system cannot be solved analytically.  Simulations run using climate models can provide insight into climate behaviors and modes, and the impact of changes &lt;/del&gt;considered &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;external the the climate system&lt;/del&gt;, because &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;they &lt;/del&gt;cannot yet &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;be predicted &lt;/del&gt;or &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;because they are &lt;/del&gt;the &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;result &lt;/del&gt;of &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;human behavior&lt;/del&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;A '''climate model''' is a &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;simplified &lt;/ins&gt;numerical simulation of the climate.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The climate &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;is generally not &lt;/ins&gt;considered &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;predictable&lt;/ins&gt;, because &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;we &lt;/ins&gt;cannot yet &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;predict future solar behavior &lt;/ins&gt;or &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;volcanic activity and not all &lt;/ins&gt;the &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;internal processes &lt;/ins&gt;of &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;the climate are well understood&lt;/ins&gt;.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;The external changes, called forcings, are inputs &lt;/del&gt;to the climate &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;simulations&lt;/del&gt;.  &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Climate forcings include variations in solar activity&lt;/del&gt;, &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;volcanic emissions &lt;/del&gt;of &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;aerosols, particulates and &lt;/del&gt;greenhouse &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;gases&lt;/del&gt;, &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;human emissions of aerosols, particulates &lt;/del&gt;and &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;greenhouse gases, human land use changes, and surface characteristics.  Some surface characteristics such as topography are static over the course of a simulation while others may change as a result of simulated internal processes of the climate, such as soil moisture content or snow cover.  The latter are examples of &lt;/del&gt;climate &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;feedbacks&lt;/del&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Climate scientists attempt to validate or prove the skill of the models by tuning them &lt;/ins&gt;to &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;match observations of &lt;/ins&gt;the climate.  &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Currently the most advanced climate models&lt;/ins&gt;, &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;still disagree by more than a factor &lt;/ins&gt;of &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;two in their sensitivity to &lt;/ins&gt;greenhouse &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;gas forcing&lt;/ins&gt;, and &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;have significant disagreements with observed &lt;/ins&gt;climate &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;behavior at high latitudes&lt;/ins&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Climate feedbacks &lt;/del&gt;are &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;internal climate processes that positively reinforce or negatively oppose &lt;/del&gt;the &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;direct effect &lt;/del&gt;of &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;external &lt;/del&gt;climate &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;forcings.  For example, the direct effect of increases in solar activity or increases &lt;/del&gt;in greenhouse gas &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;levels is a warming effect&lt;/del&gt;.  &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;The resulting increases in temperature increase evaporation.  The increased water vapor, the most abundant greenhouse gas, is expected to further increase the direct warming effect, and represents a positive feedback to either of those forcings.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;They &lt;/ins&gt;are&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;, therefore, utterly unable to project &lt;/ins&gt;the &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;change &lt;/ins&gt;of climate in &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;response to future &lt;/ins&gt;greenhouse gas &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;scenarios&lt;/ins&gt;.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;While humans live in &lt;/del&gt;the &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;atmosphere on the land, nearly all the heat capacity of the climate system is in the oceans.  Therefore, simulations of &lt;/del&gt;the &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;atmosphere&lt;/del&gt;, &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;must be coupled &lt;/del&gt;to &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;simulations of the oceans for any hope of realistic long term simulations&lt;/del&gt;.  &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;A warming or cooling of the climate should be reflected in the heat content of the ocean.  A global climate model (GCM) that is coupled to the ocean is called an Atmosphere Ocean GCM (AOGCM).&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;All &lt;/ins&gt;the &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;models are claimed to have good agreement with &lt;/ins&gt;the &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;20th century temperature trends&lt;/ins&gt;, &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;yet are acknowledged &lt;/ins&gt;to &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;have significant errors&lt;/ins&gt;.   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;==Climate Prediction==&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The climate is generally not considered predictable, because we cannot yet predict future solar behavior or volcanic activity and not all the internal processes of the climate are well understood.  Climate models can be used to attempt to '''project''' the climate based on certain assumptions about future forcings such as greenhouse gas emissions scenarios or changes in solar activity.  The usefulness of such projections for human decision making is dependent on the skill of the models in representing the internal climate processes involved.  Climate scientists attempt to validate or prove the skill of the models by tuning them to match observations of the climate.  Currently the most advanced climate models, still disagree by more than a factor of two in their sensitivity to greenhouse gas forcing, and have significant disagreements with observed climate behavior at high latitudes.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;==Models used by the IPCC AR4==&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Most of the models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment Report (IPCC AR4) are AOGCMs, and have been extensively studied with results and analyses appearing the peer review literature.  Models are a key tool of climate science and are central to attempts to assess the relative contributions of various climate forcings to the recent [[global warming]] and to attempts to project the change of climate in response to future greenhouse gas scenarios.  &lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Even though the climate sensitivities (to CO2) differ by over a factor of two, the IPCC has not decided which models are more accurate for purposes of attribution and projection.  All the models are claimed to have good agreement with the 20th century temperature trends, yet are acknowledged to have significant errors.  The IPCC hopes that by combining the range of models they will bracket the sensitivity of the actual climate, and that the errors in different models will be different and will tend to cancel out when the results are combined.  Multiple runs of a model, called an ensemble, are needed to capture a model's climatology, since models are expected to have internal variability just as the climate does.  When runs from multiple models are combined together in an attempt reduce or cancel out their errors, this is called a meta-ensemble.  Meta-ensembles rely on the assumption that their errors are not correlated, otherwise, they cannot cancel.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Unfortunately the models have been shown to have signifcant correlated error.  Roesch (2006) found that '''all''' the AR4 models had a positive surface albedo bias, chiefly due to excessive snow cover area and snow water equivilent in the temperate climate zones, a delayed snow melt, and a poor parameterization of the albedo in forests with snow cover.  He was able to globally and annually average positive surface albedo bias and compare it to satellite observations.  The albedo errors were 0.016 and 0.019 relative to the PINKER and ISCCP-FD satellite observations respectively.  A positive albedo bias in the models means that more solar energy is being reflected back into space than in the actual climate.  For approximate perspective on the size of this error, the albedo errors can be converted to watts per meter squared by applying a figure for the average downward solar surface flux of 198W/m^2.  This gives a globally and annual averaged error of over 3W/m^2.  This is over 4 times the decadal  mean global warming energy imbalance of 0.75W/m^2 (Hansen 2005)&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Stroeve (2007) reported that '''all''' the AR4 models were melting the Arctic polar ice but at rates significantly slower than the actual climate.  The melting of the ice cap in response to warming replaces the ice with open ocean which has a much lower albedo, thus reflecting less solar energy and absorbing more solar energy, thereby positively reinforcing the warming.  This is the ice-albedo feedback.  Since, the models all under represent this positive feedback observed in the climate, they are once again biased against solar forcing, reflecting more solar energy into space than the observations.  This is more correlated error that cannot be canceled by the IPCC meta-ensembles.  It is unclear to what extent this is independent or duplicative of the surface albedo errors reported by Roesch. Roesch did not explicitly report polar ice cap discrepancies with the observations in his study.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;== References == &lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Hansen, James; Larissa Nazarenko, Reto Ruedy, Makiko Sato, Josh Willis, Anthony Del Genio, Dorothy Koch, Andrew Lacis, Ken Lo, Surabi Menon, Tica Novakov, Judith Perlwitz, Gary Russell, Gavin A. Schmidt, Nicholas Tausnev. [http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2005/2005_Hansen_etal_1.pdf &amp;quot;Earth's Energy Imbalance: Confirmation and Implications&amp;quot;] (2005). Science 308 (5727): 1431–1435. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1110252 DOI:10.1126/science.1110252]&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Roesch, A. (2006). [http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2006/2005JD006473.shtml &amp;quot;Evaluation of surface albedo and snow cover in AR4 coupled climate models&amp;quot;]. J. Geophys. Res.. DOI:10.1029/2005JD006473. “The mean annual surface albedo of the 15 AR4 models amounts to 0.140 with a standard deviation of 0.013. All AR4 models are slightly above the mean of PINKER (0.124) and ISCCP-FD (0.121).&amp;quot; &amp;quot;These substantial deviations are still far too high to meet the required accuracy of surface albedos in GCMs.”&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Stroeve, J.C.; M. M. Holland, W. Meier, T. Scambos, and M. Serreze (2007). [http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/prrl/2007-11.html &amp;quot;Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast&amp;quot;]. Geophys. Res. Lett 34. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029703 DOI:10.1029/2007GL029703]. “All models participating in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4) show declining Arctic ice cover over this period. However, depending on the time window for analysis, none or very few individual model simulations show trends comparable to observations.&amp;quot; Co-author Scambos from press release: &amp;quot;Because of this disparity, the shrinking of summertime ice is about thirty years ahead of the climate model projections.”  &lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Mathematics]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Mathematics]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Meteorology]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Meteorology]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=203898&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jaques at 04:45, June 21, 2007</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=203898&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-06-21T04:45:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;A '''climate model''' is a numerical simulation of the climate.  The mathematics describing the  complex nonlinear dynamics of the climate system cannot be solved analytically.  Simulations run using climate models can provide insight into climate behaviors and modes, and the impact of changes considered external the the climate system, because they cannot yet be predicted or because they are the result of human behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external changes, called forcings, are inputs to the climate simulations.  Climate forcings include variations in solar activity, volcanic emissions of aerosols, particulates and greenhouse gases, human emissions of aerosols, particulates and greenhouse gases, human land use changes, and surface characteristics.  Some surface characteristics such as topography are static over the course of a simulation while others may change as a result of simulated internal processes of the climate, such as soil moisture content or snow cover.  The latter are examples of climate feedbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Climate feedbacks are internal climate processes that positively reinforce or negatively oppose the direct effect of external climate forcings.  For example, the direct effect of increases in solar activity or increases in greenhouse gas levels is a warming effect.  The resulting increases in temperature increase evaporation.  The increased water vapor, the most abundant greenhouse gas, is expected to further increase the direct warming effect, and represents a positive feedback to either of those forcings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While humans live in the atmosphere on the land, nearly all the heat capacity of the climate system is in the oceans.  Therefore, simulations of the atmosphere, must be coupled to simulations of the oceans for any hope of realistic long term simulations.  A warming or cooling of the climate should be reflected in the heat content of the ocean.  A global climate model (GCM) that is coupled to the ocean is called an Atmosphere Ocean GCM (AOGCM).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Climate Prediction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The climate is generally not considered predictable, because we cannot yet predict future solar behavior or volcanic activity and not all the internal processes of the climate are well understood.  Climate models can be used to attempt to '''project''' the climate based on certain assumptions about future forcings such as greenhouse gas emissions scenarios or changes in solar activity.  The usefulness of such projections for human decision making is dependent on the skill of the models in representing the internal climate processes involved.  Climate scientists attempt to validate or prove the skill of the models by tuning them to match observations of the climate.  Currently the most advanced climate models, still disagree by more than a factor of two in their sensitivity to greenhouse gas forcing, and have significant disagreements with observed climate behavior at high latitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models used by the IPCC AR4==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment Report (IPCC AR4) are AOGCMs, and have been extensively studied with results and analyses appearing the peer review literature.  Models are a key tool of climate science and are central to attempts to assess the relative contributions of various climate forcings to the recent [[global warming]] and to attempts to project the change of climate in response to future greenhouse gas scenarios.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though the climate sensitivities (to CO2) differ by over a factor of two, the IPCC has not decided which models are more accurate for purposes of attribution and projection.  All the models are claimed to have good agreement with the 20th century temperature trends, yet are acknowledged to have significant errors.  The IPCC hopes that by combining the range of models they will bracket the sensitivity of the actual climate, and that the errors in different models will be different and will tend to cancel out when the results are combined.  Multiple runs of a model, called an ensemble, are needed to capture a model's climatology, since models are expected to have internal variability just as the climate does.  When runs from multiple models are combined together in an attempt reduce or cancel out their errors, this is called a meta-ensemble.  Meta-ensembles rely on the assumption that their errors are not correlated, otherwise, they cannot cancel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately the models have been shown to have signifcant correlated error.  Roesch (2006) found that '''all''' the AR4 models had a positive surface albedo bias, chiefly due to excessive snow cover area and snow water equivilent in the temperate climate zones, a delayed snow melt, and a poor parameterization of the albedo in forests with snow cover.  He was able to globally and annually average positive surface albedo bias and compare it to satellite observations.  The albedo errors were 0.016 and 0.019 relative to the PINKER and ISCCP-FD satellite observations respectively.  A positive albedo bias in the models means that more solar energy is being reflected back into space than in the actual climate.  For approximate perspective on the size of this error, the albedo errors can be converted to watts per meter squared by applying a figure for the average downward solar surface flux of 198W/m^2.  This gives a globally and annual averaged error of over 3W/m^2.  This is over 4 times the decadal  mean global warming energy imbalance of 0.75W/m^2 (Hansen 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stroeve (2007) reported that '''all''' the AR4 models were melting the Arctic polar ice but at rates significantly slower than the actual climate.  The melting of the ice cap in response to warming replaces the ice with open ocean which has a much lower albedo, thus reflecting less solar energy and absorbing more solar energy, thereby positively reinforcing the warming.  This is the ice-albedo feedback.  Since, the models all under represent this positive feedback observed in the climate, they are once again biased against solar forcing, reflecting more solar energy into space than the observations.  This is more correlated error that cannot be canceled by the IPCC meta-ensembles.  It is unclear to what extent this is independent or duplicative of the surface albedo errors reported by Roesch. Roesch did not explicitly report polar ice cap discrepancies with the observations in his study.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References == &lt;br /&gt;
Hansen, James; Larissa Nazarenko, Reto Ruedy, Makiko Sato, Josh Willis, Anthony Del Genio, Dorothy Koch, Andrew Lacis, Ken Lo, Surabi Menon, Tica Novakov, Judith Perlwitz, Gary Russell, Gavin A. Schmidt, Nicholas Tausnev. [http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2005/2005_Hansen_etal_1.pdf &amp;quot;Earth's Energy Imbalance: Confirmation and Implications&amp;quot;] (2005). Science 308 (5727): 1431–1435. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1110252 DOI:10.1126/science.1110252]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roesch, A. (2006). [http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2006/2005JD006473.shtml &amp;quot;Evaluation of surface albedo and snow cover in AR4 coupled climate models&amp;quot;]. J. Geophys. Res.. DOI:10.1029/2005JD006473. “The mean annual surface albedo of the 15 AR4 models amounts to 0.140 with a standard deviation of 0.013. All AR4 models are slightly above the mean of PINKER (0.124) and ISCCP-FD (0.121).&amp;quot; &amp;quot;These substantial deviations are still far too high to meet the required accuracy of surface albedos in GCMs.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stroeve, J.C.; M. M. Holland, W. Meier, T. Scambos, and M. Serreze (2007). [http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/prrl/2007-11.html &amp;quot;Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast&amp;quot;]. Geophys. Res. Lett 34. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029703 DOI:10.1029/2007GL029703]. “All models participating in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4) show declining Arctic ice cover over this period. However, depending on the time window for analysis, none or very few individual model simulations show trends comparable to observations.&amp;quot; Co-author Scambos from press release: &amp;quot;Because of this disparity, the shrinking of summertime ice is about thirty years ahead of the climate model projections.”  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mathematics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Meteorology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jaques</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=185503&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Sulgran: categorizing and spelling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Climate_model&amp;diff=185503&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-06-01T09:41:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;categorizing and spelling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;A '''climate model''' is a numerical simulation of the climate.  The mathematics describing the  complex nonlinear dynamics of the climate system cannot be solved analytically.  Simulations run using climate models can provide insight into climate behaviors and modes, and the impact of changes considered external the the climate system, because they cannot yet be predicted or because they are the result of human behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The external changes, called forcings, are inputs to the climate simulations.  Climate forcings include variations in solar activity, volcanic emissions of aerosols, particulates and greenhouse gases, human emissions of aerosols, particulates and greenhouse gases, human land use changes, and surface characteristics.  Some surface characteristics such as topography are static over the course of a simulation while others may change as a result of simulated internal processes of the climate, such as soil moisture content or snow cover.  The latter are examples of climate feedbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Climate feedbacks are internal climate processes that positively reinforce or negatively oppose the direct effect of external climate forcings.  For example, the direct effect of increases in solar activity or increases in greenhouse gas levels is a warming effect.  The resulting increases in temperature increase evaporation.  The increased water vapor, the most abundant greenhouse gas, is expected to further increase the direct warming effect, and represents a positive feedback to either of those forcings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While humans live in the atmosphere on the land, nearly all the heat capacity of the climate system is in the oceans.  Therefore, simulations of the atmosphere, must be coupled to simulations of the oceans for any hope of realistic long term simulations.  A warming or cooling of the climate should be reflected in the heat content of the ocean.  A global climate model (GCM) that is coupled to the ocean is called an Atmosphere Ocean GCM (AOGCM).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Climate Prediction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The climate is generally not considered predictable, because we cannot yet predict future solar behavior or volcanic activity and not all the internal processes of the climate are well understood.  Climate models can be used to attempt to '''project''' the climate based on certain assumptions about future forcings such as greenhouse gas emissions scenarios or changes in solar activity.  The usefulness of such projections for human decision making is dependent on the skill of the models in representing the internal climate processes involved.  Climate scientists attempt to validate or prove the skill of the models by tuning them to match observations of the climate.  Currently the most advanced climate models, still disagree by more than a factor of two in their sensitivity to greenhouse gas forcing, and have significant disagreements with observed climate behavior at high latitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Models used by the IPCC AR4==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the models used by the International Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment Report (IPCC AR4) are AOGCMs, and have been extensively studied with results and analyses appearing the peer review literature.  Models are a key tool of climate science and are central to attempts to assess the relative contributions of various climate forcings to the recent [[global warming]] and to attempts to project the change of climate in response to future greenhouse gas scenarios.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though the climate sensitivities (to CO2) differ by over a factor of two, the IPCC has not decided which models are more accurate for purposes of attribution and projection.  All the models are claimed to have good agreement with the 20th century temperature trends, yet are acknowledged to have significant errors.  The IPCC hopes that by combining the range of models they will bracket the sensitivity of the actual climate, and that the errors in different models will be different and will tend to cancel out when the results are combined.  Multiple runs of a model, called an ensemble, are needed to capture a model's climatology, since models are expected to have internal variability just as the climate does.  When runs from multiple models are combined together in an attempt reduce or cancel out their errors, this is called a meta-ensemble.  Meta-ensembles rely on the assumption that their errors are not correlated, otherwise, they cannot cancel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mathematics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Meteorology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Information technology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Sulgran</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>